FOR USE IN SCHOOLS AND LIBRARIES ONLY. Awe and exhiliration--along with heartbreak and mordant wit--abound in Lolita, which tells the story of the aging Humbert Humbert's obsessive, doomed passion for the nymphet Dolores Haze.
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
By Sharon Bryan
One of my favorite books. The true seduction that lies within "Lolita" is not between Humbert Humbert and Lolita, but rather between Nabakov and the reader. With his prose and voice, he lures the reader in, and--content matter be damned--I was rapt until the last page. While some may be uncomfortable with the subject matter, it is handled with great care and the characters are far too complex for this to be a simple matter of predator and prey. The details in the book are exquisite, from expressing a simple gesture, a heartbreaking emotion, or a surreal and ludicrous road trip through America. Each character is fascinating--their motives, thoughts, actions, morals, and desires are complex, but often comedic at heart. And there is no lack of humor in "Lolita", the author cleverly uses comedy, often to reveal the undeniable truths of his characters. This book is rare in that so many people who read it have such a strong opinion or reaction to it...for that reason, and for the outstanding writing, I highly recommend this beautifully written classic. No matter what your opinion--it will rouse, interest, amuse, and grab you emotionally from beginning to end.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
I've always admired how native speakers of other languages are able to write so eloquently in English. Perhaps it is the way their native language shapes how they view the world. In Lolita Nabokov provides the reader with poetry in every paragraph.
Readers of diminished intelligence or those simply less open minded may be disgusted by the premise of this book. Keep in mind that while this was shocking in the 1950's, a 12 year old girl choosing to have sex is rather normal in 2010.
On to the story itself:
While Humbert's relationship with Lolita is the backdrop of this novel, what I found the central theme to be was Humbert's wrestling with his own mind, desires and society's perception of him and his actions. Is Humbert such a bad guy? What does Humbert think? Keep that in mind as you read, because the book is not about Lolita at all, but all about Humbert.
I've knocked off a star because, while I speak SOME French, one really has to be a fluent French speaker to understand some of the finer points about the thoughts going through our main character's head. Perhaps that makes this book all the more scholarly, but I found myself having to run to an online translator to make sense of some of the more complicated verses.
Readers of diminished intelligence or those simply less open minded may be disgusted by the premise of this book. Keep in mind that while this was shocking in the 1950's, a 12 year old girl choosing to have sex is rather normal in 2010.
On to the story itself:
While Humbert's relationship with Lolita is the backdrop of this novel, what I found the central theme to be was Humbert's wrestling with his own mind, desires and society's perception of him and his actions. Is Humbert such a bad guy? What does Humbert think? Keep that in mind as you read, because the book is not about Lolita at all, but all about Humbert.
I've knocked off a star because, while I speak SOME French, one really has to be a fluent French speaker to understand some of the finer points about the thoughts going through our main character's head. Perhaps that makes this book all the more scholarly, but I found myself having to run to an online translator to make sense of some of the more complicated verses.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Having just re-read this novel once more, probably for the very last time, I'm struck by a few things. First off, without a doubt, Lolita is a great novel and Nabokov was a fantastic writer.
I picked this back up because I had read about the hullabaloo concerning his final unpublished novel that had been in the custody of his son. I had also heard the story on NPR how everything he worked on, he planned out of index cards, which as a writer, sounded very familiar and incredibly intriguing. Writers always want to know exactly how their peers and heroes are pulling off their masterpieces. It's like looking behind the curtain in certain aspects. The truth is though, even great writers stumble, great men do cry, women have secrets, and so on. Yes, I know ...
The first two-thirds of this book is very patiently written, complex and incredibly absorbing. In some places the reader almost feels guilty of reading something taboo and disgust creeps under the door frame quietly causing mild disturbance. Certain passages almost make you want to throw the book to the floor and go wash you hands of it, but you know that it was all intentional. Some of Nabokov's best writing is achieved in the first portions of this book without a doubt, and a few passages are indelible, touching and even sweet.
However, without gilding the lilly with praise which is easy to do, I must say that this book also has a few flaws. While the realism of the conclusion is probably factual and not fantasy, the tone of the writing obviously shifts because of it. Nabokov strings you along into dizzying heights of all kinds of interest and intrigue and then pulls the carpet out as the book closes, drying out his text like beef jerky left on hot concrete in the midday sun -- forcing real life down your throat in a very mechanical manner. I often wonder if some of this was due to the material itself, or suggestions and changes made by his agent or subsequent changes that he made himself during the editing process and so on. I can imagine his representation being frightened to push this book.
The point is that 'Lolita' almost collapses in on itself with it's ending. It seems like an ending to a different book entirely. Like the mid section of Oliver Twist where the lascivious and murderous deeds are removed for the length of almost a bible whilst our young Twist becomes a country squire and we have to endure a failing love-affair, the story degrades, interest wanes and the conclusion is read to the end, because you are compelled to see the ending even if it doesn't seem to fit with the rest of the story. Many good books have the tendency to fall apart, but the world of novels is not today what it was yesterday and such is the curse of change, marketing and popular culture. It makes a person wonder if Nabokov wasn't making a parody of himself here and denigrating it openly by naming himself Humbert Humbert.
I think realistic conclusions are often better than overly-dramatic or contrived ones to be honest. I've done that myself and in the same genre, but if Nabokov had to submit Lolita today to the grinder of New York literary acceptance, the world would probably be minus one book.
... ...
I picked this back up because I had read about the hullabaloo concerning his final unpublished novel that had been in the custody of his son. I had also heard the story on NPR how everything he worked on, he planned out of index cards, which as a writer, sounded very familiar and incredibly intriguing. Writers always want to know exactly how their peers and heroes are pulling off their masterpieces. It's like looking behind the curtain in certain aspects. The truth is though, even great writers stumble, great men do cry, women have secrets, and so on. Yes, I know ...
The first two-thirds of this book is very patiently written, complex and incredibly absorbing. In some places the reader almost feels guilty of reading something taboo and disgust creeps under the door frame quietly causing mild disturbance. Certain passages almost make you want to throw the book to the floor and go wash you hands of it, but you know that it was all intentional. Some of Nabokov's best writing is achieved in the first portions of this book without a doubt, and a few passages are indelible, touching and even sweet.
However, without gilding the lilly with praise which is easy to do, I must say that this book also has a few flaws. While the realism of the conclusion is probably factual and not fantasy, the tone of the writing obviously shifts because of it. Nabokov strings you along into dizzying heights of all kinds of interest and intrigue and then pulls the carpet out as the book closes, drying out his text like beef jerky left on hot concrete in the midday sun -- forcing real life down your throat in a very mechanical manner. I often wonder if some of this was due to the material itself, or suggestions and changes made by his agent or subsequent changes that he made himself during the editing process and so on. I can imagine his representation being frightened to push this book.
The point is that 'Lolita' almost collapses in on itself with it's ending. It seems like an ending to a different book entirely. Like the mid section of Oliver Twist where the lascivious and murderous deeds are removed for the length of almost a bible whilst our young Twist becomes a country squire and we have to endure a failing love-affair, the story degrades, interest wanes and the conclusion is read to the end, because you are compelled to see the ending even if it doesn't seem to fit with the rest of the story. Many good books have the tendency to fall apart, but the world of novels is not today what it was yesterday and such is the curse of change, marketing and popular culture. It makes a person wonder if Nabokov wasn't making a parody of himself here and denigrating it openly by naming himself Humbert Humbert.
I think realistic conclusions are often better than overly-dramatic or contrived ones to be honest. I've done that myself and in the same genre, but if Nabokov had to submit Lolita today to the grinder of New York literary acceptance, the world would probably be minus one book.
... ...
Most Recent Customer Reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
Lolita
Wonderfully worded, and never a thought of remorse. The plot can be hard to get over at first, but keep reading, for it's far worthy of your attention.
Published on August 11, 2010 by bsg
5.0 out of 5 stars
Beautiful prose, disgusting subject
Nabokov writes beautifully. His prose is practically poetry itself and he weaves an excellent story of obsession and possession and gratification and overindulgence. Read more
Published on August 11, 2010 by K. E. Multop
5.0 out of 5 stars
Perfect.
Lolita, oh Lolita, where do I begin? A writer at Vanity Fair once referred to this book as, "The only convincing love story of our century. Read more
Published on June 26, 2010 by Charlie J. Cato
3.0 out of 5 stars
Oh, how disturbing, but what a gifted writer!
I am so happy to have read this book, because I can now say that I did it and be done with it. Oh, how disturbing, but what a gifted writer - and English wasn't even his native... Read more
Published on April 23, 2010 by thing two
2.0 out of 5 stars
The Binding
I love the story, but I didn't like the quality of the binding and the paper-enough to convince me that this amazon purchase is two stars. Read more
Published on December 19, 2009 by J. clark
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Literary Dichotomy
I've never been so impressed--yet so repulsed--by a piece of literature in all my days until I finally picked up this Vintage International edition of Vladimir Nabokov's disturbing... Read more
Published on October 30, 2008 by D. Mikels
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Listmania!
So You'd Like to...
|
|
