| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A thought provoking analysis of ancient Egypt,
By Bruce Trinque (Amston, CT United States) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER) (VINE VOICE) (REAL NAME)
This review is from: Tutankhamen: The Life and Death of the Boy-King (Hardcover)
I give very high marks to Christine El Mahdy's "Tutankhamen" for its vigorous, insightful examination of the reign of the so-called Boy-king. Actually, her book could be accurately titled "Akhenaten, Nefertiti, Smenkhare, Tutankhamen, and Ay" because her study extends to include all the "Amarna Period". El Mahdy contends, and rightly so I believe, that much of the conventional wisdom about this era of Egyptian history and its rulers is based not on a careful examination of the evidence, but upon outdated theories first published early in the Twentieth Century or even earlier, when the amount of information available was much smaller and our overall understanding of Egyptian culture far poorer. In this book El Mahdy goes back to basics, not blindly accepting the conclusions of other Egyptologists (many of whom appear to somewhat blindly repeat what others had written before them) but examining the original inscriptions for herself. Not infrequently they have previously been mistranslated or particular interpretations placed upon them without good justification. Inscriptions, art, tombs, and mummies are all re-examined with a rigorous application of common sense and logic. What emerges is a story strongly at variance with popular understanding of the period. El Mahdy rejects the notion that Akhenaten's "new" religion was really something radically different than the Egyptian mainstream, and she finds flaws in the notion that the so-called "heretic king" was widely hated by the Egyptian people. She also argues strongly and effectively against the idea that Smenkhare and Tutankhamen were interlopers from outside of the 18th Dynasty royal family (she supports the theory that Smenkhare was Nefertiti's identity upon ascending to a co-regency with her husband and she contends that Tutankhamen was Akhenaten's son by another wife). I have read a good many books about this era of Egyptian history, and I can think of no other which has been so thought provoking. Whether or not all of El Mahdy's conclusions will stand the test of time is something we will have to wait and see, but anyone who feels that they already "know" Akhenaten, Nefertiti, and Tutankhamen would be well advised to read this book.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Yes, but . . .,
By
This review is from: Tutankhamen: The Life and Death of the Boy-King (Paperback)
There are many good points about El Mahdy's book. It demonstrates clearly, for the non-specialist, the importance of going back to primary sources when examining historical/archaeological issues, and the need always to employ a sceptical eye and a hefty dose of common sense. It also explains matters in a way that makes them very accessible to the non-specialist. Though I can't speak for the accuracy of the evidence she presents and her conclusions, being a non-specialist myself, in the first three quarters of the book which deal with the "Armarna Period" her material was presented clearly and understandably, and seemed reasonable for the most part. However, I found her examination of Tutankhamen's life in the final part of the book much harder to swallow. It was very rushed and seemed to jump to an awful lot of conclusions.One final quibble: I am sick to death of authors telling us about their childhood in what so often appears to be an attempt to claim some extra authority in their particular field. El Mahdy has always loved Egypt, taught herself to read hieroglyphs as a child, and decided at the age of ten she was going to be an Egyptologist? So what? What counts is her academic achievements, not her childhood quirks.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
a good story that could be better told,
By A Customer
This review is from: Tutankhamen: The Life and Death of the Boy-King (Hardcover)
Christine el Mahdy obviously has a fascinating take on the life of Tutankhamen, with what are apparently new and very interesting theories about his parentage, his life and death, the cultural and political life of his time, and his entombment. However, while she criticises other archeologists, past and present, for jumping to conclusions, making unwarranted assumptions, and cutting data to fit the shape of their expectations, her writing invites her readers to conclude that she's done the same thing herself. It's one thing to say that evidence "suggests" a conclusion, and it's something else again to present such a conclusion as a fact, as El Mahdy often does in writing of her own findings. The problem, as el Mahdy repeatedly says, is that we don't KNOW--we can only infer based on evidence, and I could wish she's taken this precept to heart in presenting her own conclusions, which would appear to be more serious if she had presented them more judiciously. I also found this book an irritating read, because it is full of repetition as well as typographical (1959 for 1859) and editorial (it's for its, everyone...their) errors. Can't help but feel that a month or so under the pencil of a good editor would have given the book a much cleaner shape and a good deal more pace and excitement. El Mahdy's not to blame for the failings of her publishers, though, and it is a good story, once you get to it.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|