Most Helpful Customer Reviews
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
a place to start, July 25, 2004
This review is from: The Two Faces of Islam: Saudi Fundamentalism and Its Role in Terrorism (Paperback)
I found the book a generally good read. However, as someone who knows very little about Islam, I get the feeling that this book is not telling the whole story. He seems to paint the world of Islam in general black and white strokes, with 'good' and 'bad' Muslims. Another problem I had is that Schwartz makes alot of accusations about members of some American Islamic institutions being terrorrists, but buries any information in the footnotes. I felt that such strong accusations deserved more information in the book. One reader says that this should be the one book a person should read, but I would disagree. It is definitely worth the time to read, but it left me looking for some different points of view.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
pretty good work - NOT necessarily "objective" though, May 10, 2005
This review is from: The Two Faces of Islam: Saudi Fundamentalism and Its Role in Terrorism (Paperback)
Schwartz did not go out to write an academic treatise on Islam or write an "objective" piece about how terrible they are (much to the chagrin of many). He wrote on his own research and his own experiences, and he says so very directly at the beginning of his book. His sources and experiences are solid. Several reviewers of the book show great disdain that Schwartz either doesn't go into great, gory detail of how awful Islam is compared to their religions or how he seems to take "their" side. Schwartz makes very good points in the book, and anyone who really wants to learn something new will get it.
Schwartz doesn't paint a rosy picture of what Islam has become in many quarters, but he puts a lot of things into understandable context. Someone in another review wrote that Schwartz doesn't ever site the Qu'ran...
Obviously, they didn't read the book. Schwartz quotes the Qu'ran no less than six times by the end of Chapter One.
* * * * * * *
No. It's not an emotionless, totally objective work. Yes. It is partly a history book and partly an explanation of the "sociology of Islam".
Order it if you want to broaden your horizons on the subject. If you want more reasons to hate or dismiss Islam, find another, because Schwartz' book does such a good job all you'll do is get upset.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
13 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Saudis as seen by a Sufi, April 27, 2004
By A Customer
This review is from: The Two Faces of Islam: Saudi Fundamentalism and Its Role in Terrorism (Paperback)
I tend to agree with the first review on this site by "a reader" who wonders whose side Stephen Schwartz is on. I have read his articles in The Weekly Standard and elsewhere and expected a more Western view of Islam. The acknowledgement section at the end of the text reveals what some chapters implied, that Schwartz is himself a Sufi mystic from a Jewish background. That explains his portrayal of the Shi'ites and Sufis in the Balkans, Caucasus and central Asia in innocuous terms, and his soft treatment of the Iranian Islamist revolution. That being said, his book is an excellent and detailed portrayal of the rise of the Sa'ud dynasty and its partner, the Wahhabi sect of Islam, which I would describe as a Bedouinized, harsh and austere view of religion. I dislike the terms radical and fundamentalist because they suggest a return to the roots or foundational principles of a movement. Judging rom Schwartz's account of the life and character of Muhammed, there is very little of his basic principles in Wahhabism, which is militant and domineering, practicing a kind of religious colonialism toward all other branches of Islam using oil wealth to export its philosophy through building mosques, complete with Wahhabist imams and schools of indoctrination nearly everywhere. These are the source of mujahadin, who are not the philosopher warriors of the past but brainwashed juveniles who have been turned into suicide bombers in madrassas. They have had their view of life, the normal hope and ambition of young people, stripped away and a vision of martyrdom, resting in the Garden of Allah with 72 dark-eyed virgins, inculcated in its place. This book left me with unanswered questions about the Iranian version of Islam, which Schwartz says is very strict, but not imperialist like the Wahhabis, but its recent meddling in Iraq and attempting to foment a Shi'ite uprising makes me doubt that. The book is a collection of Schwartz's past writings as a journalist, and so seems disjointed and erratic at times, but it is nevertheless a good history of the Sa'ud dynasty and its support for terror around the world. More Westerners need to look beyond the assurances from our governments and media that Wahhabism is merely a conservative form of Islam. It's not. It's an apostate doomsday cult with the same kind of aims as Communism and Nazism, to conquer and control the world. It's as hostile to other historic brands of Islam as it is toward Jews and Christians, and it must not be allowed to use our laws and tolerance of religious pluralism as cover for its subversive and deceitful activities.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
