Jobrack is very detailed in reiterating how the textbook industry works, how the education bureaucracy functions, and why teachers are so disheartened by the atmosphere they are trying to teach in. This book is not an easy read. Unfortunately, after clearly helping the reader identify the problems, her text becomes as boring as the textbooks she condemns. While pointing out that learning language is critical to education, she uses so many bureaucratic buzz words that when you finish a paragraph of her proposed change, it is empty of meaning. When a politician says, "We need to improve. We need to find the answers, We need to implement change." What did they really say that had any meaning? I had hoped that Jobrack could pinpoint practical solutions.
Highlights (the short version)
"Phonics, whole word, whole language, mastery learning, open classroom, team teaching, constructivism, discovery learning, multiculturalism, learning modalities, multiple intelligences, and differentiated instruction have all had their days in the sun. The educational pendulum swings from teacher-directed to student-driven instruction." Adults recognize that these techniques were used on them and have concluded that they have provided no lasting benefit to themselves.
Textbook publishers are in it for the money, not accuracy or thoroughness. To mollify the special interest groups, the history books are now 1000+ pages that have more graphics than substance. The authors are selected because they have written books previously, not because they know the subject matter.
Enough years have passed to prove that teacher's seniority or advanced degrees, smaller classes, smaller schools, and higher teacher pay has not improved student performance.
Highlights (the long version)
"I quickly learned that teaching was more about discipline and control than education."
"Teachers are judged on how they connected to students or made learning fun. Rarely are they judged on how effective they are or how much students achieved or absorbed."
"The stark reality of K-12 teaching often causes a sense of mistrust of the college experience and a confirmation that professors are out of touch with classroom realities."
One third of teachers feel unqualified to teach math or science. They just follow the textbook.
She cites statistics to verify the shortcomings of the current system. In the end the reader believes that all the segments are broken.
What's missing:
After acknowledging the superior performance of foreign students, she never suggests adopting any of their methods. She's already exposed the "continuing education" concept as worthless and the unwillingness of teachers to change their routines. She seems content to reform the system one piece at a time after telling you that it has been tried and failed.
If the textbooks are trying to cover too much material and too shallow, why not simplify? The reliance on "experts" is what helped create the mess. The reading, writing, and arithmetic generation of a century ago produced the great minds that served the public so well. The "college prep" curriculum neither prepares students for college, nor does college prepare them for a job. The vast majority of people never use the information they learned in school. So what was the value? Day care for working parents?
My observation: You want a child to learn to read? (If you can't read, you can't study anything.) Let them read anything that interests them- sports stories, fairy tales, rules of a computer game. If they want to know, they'll learn. Provide real life applications of the math- grocery shopping, iPod buying, investing. Study how and why things happened in history by taking them to places that have the clothes, tools, weapons of that time. Have them eat the food of that time to learn why spices were so prized. Let them write reports about what excites them that is connected to the subject being studied. The textbook can provide ideas or explanations to supplement. It is the map, not the destination.