| ||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Images, Politics, and Policy,
By Faizan Haq (USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The U.S. Media and the Middle East: Image and Perception (Paperback)
The book does an excellent job of challenging the US media. Each of the eighteen essays brings out a unique approach. This work definitely needs to be followed up with comprehesive reaserch project to measure the impact of these images on the daily lives of Muslims, Middle Easterners, and Americans no matter where they live on the globe.
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent, insightful book,
By AZNmovieFan (USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The U.S. Media and the Middle East: Image and Perception (Kindle Edition)
The author has put together a very strong analysis of the persistent bias against and demonization of Muslims, particularly of Arabs in American media. The mantra of hate speech which passes as news in American media is indicted in this book. Definitely recommended book.
19 of 46 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
The U.S. Media and the Middle East,
By Daniel Pipes, Middle East Forum, Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The U.S. Media and the Middle East: Image and Perception (Paperback)
In a display of remarkable consensus, all eighteen chapters of "The U.S. Media and the Middle East" argue that the American "public has a grossly distorted view of the Third World" in general, the Middle East in particular, and Arabs and Iranians most of all. Author after author flays the press for its exaggerations, inaccuracies, and falsehoods. Editors, editorialists, reporters, movie makers, and even cartoonists come in for a severe tongue lashing. It's as though every author had been given the ideological script in advance, then told to flesh out with details. But wait. Is the American press really all that bad? One author, Mahboob Hashem (an assistant professor of communications at Fort Hays State University in Kansas) combed through all of Time and Newsweek for a four-year period, 1990-93 and found the coverage predictably wretched ("stereotyping Arabs and portraying them as backward, terrorists, camel jockeys, and the like"). But then Hashem usefully summarizes seven main themes he found in the weeklies' coverage. These bear noting, for they will strike most Americans as reasonable: "Middle East region in decline; fundamentalist movement growing; democracy lacking; Arab unity a facade; Arabs live in the past; slavery exists in parts of the Arab world; and political climate changing" (that is, rejectionists weakening, peace process taking hold). Maybe, just maybe, the media has the story basically right and these professors of communications, media studies, and public relations have it wrong. Maybe too, professors of communications should stay away from the Middle East. (A welter of errors reinforces that notion, my favorite being "King Saddam Hussein). Middle East Quarterly, December 1995
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|