Chris Hallquist's book is one unlike any I've ever read. The title alone caught my eye and made me wonder why he would include such things as UFOs, ghosts, and Jesus in the same book, but his method became clear immediately. He uses comparisons and analogies that everyone will be able to understand and identify with in order to help everyone take away as much as possible from his book. His style of argument is also very easily digestible for anyone who likes to use his or her mind on a regular basis.
Hallquist pulls a multitude of disciplines into his book: philosophy, religious studies, history, psychology, etc. There is something in this book for everyone. For instance, as someone interested in psychology, I was drawn to his sections in which he discusses how difficult it is to doubt something once introduced to the belief. This is why legends are so hard to pull back into reasonable terms. He also addressed Nostradamus, a 16th century seer, and how the fact that his prophecies seemingly kept "coming to be" simply shows that humans believe things when they want to be believe them. With each field of study that he brings into his book, he presents a sufficient amount of background to help the layman understand where he is coming from.
The other interesting thing about Hallquist's book is that he argues against fundamentalist writers and other religious apologists by using their own logic against them. He shows that the historical evidence that they are so desperately using to support their own position actually works against them. Using the historical evidence and using quotes directly from the bible shows that the evidence is actually extremely thin, and that there are dozens of ways of interpreting the evidence due to a multitude of circumstances, including who wrote the evidence itself. He also uses gaps in time and other factors that further weaken fundamentalist evidence of historical absolute truth.
Chris Hallquist tackles this topic in a more user-friendly way than writers such as Richard Dawkins, for example, because Dawkins does not make me want to go out and learn more about the topic. At the very end of UFOs, Ghosts, and a Rising God, Hallquist issues a warning about how to avoid bunk and tells his readers to learn more about the authors he discusses. The end of his book covers talks about the part of religion that effectively forbids people from questioning their beliefs due to their fear of being eternally punished. He not only brings up this problem, but how to combat it. What I really like about this section is that he is encouraging not only further learning, but discussion and intellectual argument. As he says on the last page of his work, "Look for fresh angles. Dig deep rather than think a superficial examination will give you a sure answer. And above all, think for yourself" (180). This reminds me of a David Hume quote: "Truth springs from argument among friends." What Hallquist is advocating is not only free thinking and the power of knowledge in the area of religion, but in every subject: intellectual discussion and argument as the basis of truth.