US National Defense for the Twenty-first Century: Grand Exit Strategy [Paperback]

Edward A. Olsen (Author)

Book Description

ISBN-10: 0714681407 | ISBN-13: 978-0714681405 | Publication Date: October 1, 2001 | Edition: 1

This provocative critique of Washington's current security policies, draws on the arguments made by an array of non-interventionist and conservative-nationalist scholars. It provides a blueprint for a more restrained and unilateral US role in global affairs.

Product Details

• Paperback: 210 pages
• Publisher: Routledge; 1 edition (October 1, 2001)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0714681407
• ISBN-13: 978-0714681405
• Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.2 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 12 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #4,424,169 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Good critique of America as world policeman, February 24, 2003

By 

Joel Weeks "tobeover" (Pacifica, CA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: US National Defense for the Twenty-first Century: Grand Exit Strategy (Paperback)

As the US embarks on a dramatic expansion of military deployments and responsibilities overseas (Afghanistan and Iraq), it seems an appropriate time to consider the case against our post-WWII military globalism. Mr. Olsen presents a cogent and extremely well footnoted critique of America's self-appointed role as world policeman, and offers a blueprint for a set of policies to support an "isolationist" or "Fortress America" approach to our defense needs.

Mr. Olsen does a good job pointing out how this approach, by necessarily focusing on homeland defense, would better protect us against terrorism; presents an informative summary of the full extent of our "entangling alliances" around the globe; and documents our Allies unwillingness to pay the bill for their own defense. He covers all regions of the world in a plan for a retreat from our forward military deployments, including a discussion of Korea.

You don't see this kind of well-reasoned attack on our foreign policy underpinnings in the mainstream media very often, and I found it timely and interesting. It is up the reader to try to reconcile this approach, with say, a well-argued case for intervention and globalism in a specific case such as Iraq (Ken Pollack).

1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars One Superb Point, Missing the Other Half of the Idea, July 5, 2003

By 

Robert D. Steele (Oakton, VA United States) - See all my reviews
(TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (HALL OF FAME REVIEWER)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: US National Defense for the Twenty-first Century: Grand Exit Strategy (Paperback)

This book is worth buying for its documentation of one really superb point, to wit, that the U.S. is in fact entangled in too many alliances requiring too much money and too much manpower to support, all of which in the aggregate hand-cuff the Nation and drain its resources. Right on--we should start with getting out of Korea and cutting all military assistance funds to the Middle Eastern nations.

Unfortunately, the book strikes a very libertarian and somewhat naive tone in suggesting that a Fortress America approach to national defense is both possible and desireable. Although published after 9-11, and by an author who is surely aware of the 32 failed states, 66 nations with mass migration issues, 33 countries with starvation, 59 with modern plagues, many with water scarcity and ethnic conflict--18 of which have degenerated into genocide in recent times--he marches blithly on without reference to the inherent vulnerability of the US--not just US forces, but US businesses and US citizens and US children in the heartland--to terrorism, disease, illegal immigration, and countless other threats to global stability (and therefore to US prosperity and security here behind the water's edge).

On balance, I do not regret buying this book. The author provides a tedious but worthwhile examination of why so many of our entangling alliances should be brought to an end--including NATO--and on this vital point we are in agreement. This is not, however a strategy--it is a policy, and only a half-baked policy at that, unless it is accompanied by a larger consideration of ends, ways, and means that will prevent the rest of the world from imploding in a manner most threatening to the USA.