Most Helpful Customer Reviews
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Deathly and Warm, May 25, 2007
This review is from: The Undead and Philosophy: Chicken Soup for the Soulless (Popular Culture and Philosophy) (Paperback)
With plenty of blood sucking, flesh eating, seduction, grunting and more gore, (and some philosophy), this is one of the more interesting "Popular Culture and Philosophy" instalments from Open Court. Nineteen essays and more zombies than you can smash with a baseball bat. Although there is some overlap, the first part deals main with Zombies, drawing heavily from the Romero zombie films, along with some others. The second half of the book seems to focus more on the vampires, with particular focus on the novel "Dracula", (no surprises there), and also heavily from Anne Rice's "Interview with a Vampire", including the movie itself. I am not sure of this separation was intended, but it works well and there are some unique features to each of these groups. I found the first couple of essays, mainly those dealing with the nature of personhood and continued existence, a bit tough to get my head around. They were mainly in connection with zombies. If one finds it the same, wade through and persist, as it soon calms down and the essays are not only accessible overall, but very interesting and though provoking. I mean, I had never even considered a vampire who was not intrinsically evil to be a possibility. Some aspects of the "philosophical zombie thought experiment" left me a bit puzzled, as well. I did not agree with everything the contributors concluded, (such as the vegetarian essay), but I have to say that the essays were all well-written and presented. I enjoyed the wander through a genre I do not generally get into. The only zombie film I have ever seen is Shaun of the Dead. The elements of philosophy range from existentialism, (big bits on Heidegger and Neitzsche), through phenomenology and epistemology and more. This is a very thorough and varied book. For fans of the series and new readers alike, this is definitely a "must have". A great book on a great topic.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Deep thoughts for the Dead., December 26, 2006
This review is from: The Undead and Philosophy: Chicken Soup for the Soulless (Popular Culture and Philosophy) (Paperback)
I am a fan of horror fiction. In particular I have been extremely fascinated with both movies and books related to zombies lately. Vampires are another lesser fascination for me. Overall, the undead and the darkness they represent to humanity is a intriguing subject. For years I have pondered the significance of the movies of Romero and the societal implications of his great works. Apparently I have only scratched the surface compared to the varied philosophical thinkers that delve into the concept into this book. Lets get beyond asking whether or not the undead exist, lets ask whether they have the right to exist, to feed on human beings, if they are morally responsible for their actions and what we as human beings should accept from those who have returned from the grave. This books dives right in with a wide variety of philosophical pundits. Never before have I experienced the broad range of analysis on the undead and their meaning to us as human beings: why there is a need to create such revenants, how they reflect our own desires and needs, and what role they play in our lives. While the authors do tie the undead discussion in with a tremendous range of significant thinkers of the philsophical world, this is definitely not dry text book material. It is extremely topical and certainly would be a subject for a class I would be in line to take if I were once again a college student. The storybook and movie references range from Bram Stoker's Dracula to Buffy the Vampire Slayer on the blood-sucker side of the house and Romero as well as several of the zombie spin-off movies and books. I was impressed at the knowledge demonstrated-references to a variety of books and films were made that I certainly would not have expected. Very informative and often profound, this book gave me a great deal more appreciation for topics that I felt I already had a tremendous respect and fondness for. Now when one of my friends who feels that more "mainstream" movies and books have more societal relevance I can dazzle them with key topics of discussion mulled over in this remarkable work and blow their minds with debates that are just not possible with just us mere mortals in the equation.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Thought-provoking, but a little lacking, June 13, 2007
This review is from: The Undead and Philosophy: Chicken Soup for the Soulless (Popular Culture and Philosophy) (Paperback)
I love this series, and this is one of the finest of the newer bunch. I liked this book, as I spend (er, waste) of lot of time thinking about such crap anyway. Maybe that's the reason I felt that a lot of these works skipped some rather obvious insights (like, the reason zombies scare the crap out of people is because they are a snapshot of the conditions under which the person died horribly, and invite us to speculate about what happened - and what will inevitably happen to us). I guess if you've never thought about vegetarianism and zombies before, but you'd like to, this is your book. But really, either you've already thought about that, or else you'll never care, right? A nice companion to Gospel of the Living Dead: George Romero's Visions of Hell on Earth.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|