Most Helpful Customer Reviews
222 of 231 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Power of Orthodox Economic Thought, November 18, 2005
This review is from: The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor--and Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car! (Hardcover)
If you read only one pop economics book this year, The Undercover Economist should be it. Harford, a columnist for the Financial Times among other distinctions, has written a book that could almost serve as a textbook for an Economics 101 course. But it's emphatically not dry or dull. Instead, what Harford has done is convey the excitement, the power, and the often counter-intuitive results of economic thought. In so doing, he has written more or less the economic equivalent to The Selfish Gene.
Many recent books (notably Freakonomics) have dealt with the more exciting realms of economic research, such as the application of certain economic models to what most people would consider non-economic behavior. And far more books have talked about "economics" in the context of even trendier ideas like globalization (think The World is Flat or even No Logo). Such books, however, are reflections of marginal (in the case of the former) or unsophisticated (in the case of the latter) economic schools of thought.
Harford presents the orthodoxy in all its glory, and reminds readers that economists really do see the world in a different--and fascinating--way. He explains simple, but often misunderstood, concepts like adverse selection (that is, why health insurance costs too much), as well as even simpler, but far more consequential, economic models, such as David Ricardo's explanation of why landowners, and not farmers, make money from rising crop prices. Along the way, he explains why the prices at Safeway and Whole Foods are about the same--and why the prices for items on the top shelf are higher than prices for the same goods on the bottom shelf.
Granted, the book has its flaws, principally its (market-driven) lack of any equations or graphs and, more important, its refusal to take up any serious questions of macroeconomics. If you want to understand how recessions occur or how federal spending affects the world and national economy, then you're out of luck. But in focusing tightly on basic microeconomic principles--the foundation of the most insightful parts of economics--Harford succeeds in keeping the book accessible and useful.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
96 of 107 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Finally, an economist speaks my own language!, November 3, 2005
This review is from: The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor--and Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car! (Hardcover)
I just finished this book, which is a bit like a real life cheat-sheet. Give this guy the Nobel prize: he made economics INTERESTING AND FUN for me!!! A dreading challenge, believe me!
Economics is everywhere. We're surrounded by it, but most people do not think about it in they're daily lives. That's unfortunate: one would certainly learn to drive before standing behind the wheel of an automobile. So why not learn about the economic incentives that actually drive most of our own behavior before getting out and getting hit by that $2.90 latte?
Learning about those incentives is not only worth it, as the examples in this book prove again and again; it also helps you make sense of what is happening around you, and therefore make better, informed choices. If one understands how most things are driven by the invisible laws of trade, competition, inflation and cost/spending or tax incentives, then one has less chance to get abused by such a system. Even better: this book shows how to ride that system and take advantage of the inherent value one holds as a consumer.
I am finishing writing this review and am going out get a latte and do some grocery shopping. Now that I've read Tim Harford's book, I know where to go and how to make the best use of the scarce money I have (but I won't reveal the tricks here, as it would be like revealing a surprise end to a good book).
My bet is that I'll be able to save what I paid for the book by the time I log back in to Amazon to see if my review has been picked up or not!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
268 of 315 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
It's much better than Freakonomics, December 15, 2005
This review is from: The Undercover Economist: Exposing Why the Rich Are Rich, the Poor Are Poor--and Why You Can Never Buy a Decent Used Car! (Hardcover)
Steve Levitt's "Freakonomics" has made the economics of everyday life a trendy subject for readers and very lucrative for economists. Tim Harford has caught the wave with his own "The Undercover Economist." However, "The Undercover Economist" is far better.
"The Undercover Economist" does an excellent job at explaining much of economics theory through the simple experiences of everyday consumers. We all buy coffee, go to the supermarket, buy airline tickets, buy used cars, and buy or rent housing. He explains the underlying economic forces that apply to our everyday purchasing choices by relying on his extensive background in macro and microeconomics, but also Game Theory, and Behavioral Economics. As a result, he educates the reader in a broad based knowledge of economics ranging from the basic (macro economics) to the cutting edge (Game Theory).
"Freakonomics" deals with obtuse subjects that have nothing to do with consumers' everyday lives. When is the last time you were concerned with Sumo wrestlers or Chicago High School teachers cheating, or whether abortion in the 70s influenced the crime rate in NY City in the 90s. These events have nothing to do with economics but rather regression analysis. Levitt, unlike Harford, never covers basic economic topics like demand, supply, and price elasticity just to name a few.
Harford does an excellent job of tying microeconomic events to the World economy. Your buying a cup of coffee at Starbucks boosts Brazilian coffee exports to the U.S., which affects the U.S. current account deficit that impacts the U.S. demand for foreign capital that may affect interest rate levels and future economic growth. Meanwhile, by focusing on Sumo wrestlers cheating Levitt can't readily explain the Japanese trade surplus. Thus, Levitt boxes himself in a corner with nowhere to go.
Harford is a better writer. He is a well-established British FT columnist. Levitt can't write for the general public. So, he hired himself a co-author, Stephen Dubner, to put prose to paper. This strategy worked only up to a point, as Dubner wasted much ink on adulating Levitt. As a result, "Freakonomics" comes across as a PR campaign for Levitt. There is none of that self-adulating distraction in Harford's book.
Harford gives credit where credit is due. Levitt truly believes he invented a new science "Freakonomics" or the economics of everyday life. But the subject is as old as economics itself as Adam Smith in his 18th century writings always referred to everyday common transactions between local merchants and consumers. Levitt just invented a meaningless word that turned out to be lucrative. Harford often acknowledges his predecessors (from Adam Smith to Steven Landsburg) and does not claim to have invented a new science. He just intends to educate while he entertains. Harford has been successful on both counts. Levitt has not.
I recommend several other good books on this subject. These include: David Friedman's "Hidden Order: The Economics of Everyday Life", Gary Becker's "The Economics of Life", and Steve Landsburg's "The Armchair Economist."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
![[Start the discussion]](http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/x-locale/communities/discussion_boards/start-new-discussion-sec._V192250339_.gif){kind=small}
