Understanding Digital Photography: Techniques for Getting Great Pictures [Paperback]

Bryan Peterson (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: October 1, 2005

Using his popular bad image/good image pairings of real-life examples, Bryan Peterson takes the reader through all the techniques needed to succeed with digital photography in every popular genre: nature, people, sports, interiors, travel, low-light conditions, travel, weather, commercial portraits, macro, and wildlife—even how to use creative tricks such as reflections. As a bonus, Peterson explains, in straightforward text, the techniques of Photoshop as well as the basics of publishing, printing, and archiving and storing for personal or professional use. Full of great examples for beginners and serious photographers, Understanding Digital Photography makes it easy to create great digital pictures every time.

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Bryan Peterson is a well-known
photographer, writer, and teacher.
In addition to his many books for Amphoto, he writes a column that appears in Popular Photography and contributes to prominent magazines.
His workshops and online photo
course at BetterPhoto.com are invariably sold out. He divides his time between Seattle, WA, and Lyon, France.

Product Details

• Paperback: 160 pages
• Publisher: Amphoto Books (October 1, 2005)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0817437967
• ISBN-13: 978-0817437961
• Product Dimensions: 8.6 x 0.4 x 10.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (36 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #52,717 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Bryan Peterson is a professional photographer, internationally known instructor, and founder of www.PPSOP.com, The Perfect PIcture School of Photography. He is also the best-selling author of Understanding Exposure, Learning to See Creatively,Understanding Shutter Speed, Understanding Close-Up Photography, Understanding Digital Photography, Beyond Portraiture, and, most recently, Bryan Peterson's Understanding Photography Field Guide. His easy-to-understand writing and teaching style breaks down the complex and often confusing aspects of photography, translating them into what his students routinely describe as "aha" moments. In addition, he has been a commercial photographer for over 30 years, shooting annual reports for many Fortune 500 companies, and his trademark use of color and strong, graphic composition have garnered him many photographic awards, including the New York Art Director's Gold Award and honors from Communication Arts and Print magazine. He currently splits his time between Chicago and France.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

351 of 377 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Misunderstanding digital photography, May 19, 2006

By 

Rennie Petersen (Copenhagen, Denmark) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Understanding Digital Photography: Techniques for Getting Great Pictures (Paperback)

Reading "Understanding Digital Photography" by Bryon Peterson is a bit like being at a family get-together, and being given a lot of good advice by friendly Uncle Phil over a couple of beers. Then you later discover that friendly Uncle Phil didn't know what he was talking about! It does mar what was otherwise a good experience.

What makes me think of a family get-together is the folksy, jocular tone and the amusing comparisons between technical subjects and familiar things. Here are a few of Bryan Peterson's more colorful attempts at making digital photography understandable:

- The pixels on the sensor work together like a family, like socialism, and it's too bad Stalin and Mao Tse-tung couldn't see this (pg 16).

- JPEGs are like amnesia or like AM radio or like prepared meat loaf (pg 18, 20).

- TIFFs are like elephants (pg 19).

- ISO is like caffeine, and high ISO is like bloodshot eyes (pg 22).

- Long exposure times cause the pixel family to fall apart and have a nervous breakdown (pg 78).

- Checking the background is important, although typically not done regarding the person you're going to marry (pg 96).

- Over-sharpening a picture makes it glow, which could be used to guide Santa Claus and Rudolph (pg 129).

This style of writing may appeal to some people, but it's definitely not my cup of tea.

The book is richly illustrated with a lot of photographs taken by Bryan Peterson. These pictures do a good job of presenting the various techniques being discussed, and they are all good pictures from a purely technical point of view.

However, my aesthetic opinion of most of the pictures is fairly low, i.e., they are not the kind of pictures that I'd like to be able to make someday.

Bryan Peterson favors very colorful photos, and he admits that he pushes the color saturation up on most of his pictures. The composition and subjects of many of his pictures leave a kind of artificial taste, as if the pictures were being made just for the sake of making pictures that will impress.

Of course, taste is something that is very individual, and Bryan Peterson is a successful professional photographer so there are obviously many people who like his pictures.

The most serious problem with this book is the large number of technical errors concerning digital photography. Here are some of the more serious examples:

- "... the more pixels the merrier" (pg 16). Only true up to a point.

- "Every time you open and close a JPEG file on your computer, the file degrades due to data being lost..." (pg 18). Not true, and Bryan Peterson's warnings against using JPEGs are mostly incorrect.

- White balance should always be set to "Cloudy+3" (pg 26). Poor advice, especially when photographing people because of the need to get skin colors correct.

- Landscapes should be shot at f/22 (pg 34) and macros at f/32 (pg 118). This doesn't take the light diffraction problem into account.

- Depth of field properties of a lens are independent of sensor size (pg 39 and 119). Not true.

- Noise reduction should be done last in post processing (pg 57). No, it should be done first.

- Clean the sensor with compressed air (pg 127). No, this can damage the camera.

- Take pictures under-exposed by 3 stops in order to stack 8 of them in Photoshop (pg 148). Crazy advice, you should change the opacity of the layers instead.

- "The output size of that file ... will be around 2048 x 3000 ppi (pixels per inch) ..." (pg 156). Meaningless statement.

Bryan Peterson tells us that he shot film for many years and only recently switched to digital. This book was obviously written before he had learned enough about digital photography to explain it properly.

So, I don't like the tone of the writing and I don't particularly like the pictures and I don't think Bryan Peterson's knowledge of digital photography was up to the task. What did I like about this book?

Actually, the basic concepts regarding photography that Bryan Peterson describes are good. The importance of getting the picture right when shooting it (as opposed to Photoshopping it later), the way in which aperture and shutter speed affect the picture, the importance of how a picture is illuminated and composed, the value of using a tripod; all of this material represents the core concepts of photography that need to be learned in order to be able to consistently take good pictures.

Another thing I appreciated was that Bryan Peterson says that understanding the technology isn't the most important aspect of being a good photographer. "... 99% of all successful photographic images have relied on ... setting a creatively correct exposure and ... creating a well-balanced and compelling composition" (pg 10). This book is inadvertent proof that a lack of technical knowledge does not prevent a person with the proper basic knowledge of photography from taking good pictures.

Still, for a book that is targeted at those who want to learn about digital photography, the many errors disqualify it.

Rennie Petersen

52 of 53 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars Skip this one--buy the other two, May 27, 2006

By 

Jonathan (Brookline, MA United States) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Understanding Digital Photography: Techniques for Getting Great Pictures (Paperback)

Digital photography is not yet second nature to Peterson as is film SLR photography. For example, Peterson writes "2048 x 3000 ppi (pixels per inch)" instead of "2048 x 3000 pixels"--he just doesn't speak the language yet.

Below, Rennie Petersen on May 19 gives the definitive criticism of this book. I own this book as well Peterson's other two books Understanding Exposure, which I highly recommend, and Learning to See Creatively, which I like having but is second to Understanding Exposure. So my review is really summed up in the title.

46 of 48 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Disappointing... at best, June 1, 2006

By 

Bart Willems (Elmwood Park, New Jersey United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Understanding Digital Photography: Techniques for Getting Great Pictures (Paperback)

I like Bryan Peterson's other books (Learning to see Creatively and Understanding Exposure) and I was guessing that this would be a combination of the two with some additional tips towards digital photography. I expected a lot out of the book, and it didn't come out.
First of all, the 'photography' part of the book is good. Many examples and tips on how to make better pictures.
But the 'digital' part of the book is bad, really, really bad. Virtually every advice Bryan gives is wrong, or given for the wrong reason. You get the idea that mr. Peterson wanted to jump on the digital bandwagon without knowing anything about digital camera's in the first place.
I bought the book to give it to a friend who just got his first digital camera, and I wanted to see if it would be a keeper for myself. I'm keeping it, but only because I'd be ashamed to give it to somebody.
Again, the photography tips are good, and if it wasn't for the author, I would have given it three stars. But I was expecting something better.