Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Intriguing speculation, but is it history?, April 23, 2001
This review is from: Understanding Thomas Jefferson (Hardcover)
I can't improve on the scathing reviews by the experts. I can underscore the lack of solid evidence and lackaday assembly of the few facts there are. Try to find one crisp summary of Mr. Halliday's thesis anywhere in this book. You won't. Instead, you'll find a lazy summer day's read, drifting down a river of possibles. A little bit here, a little bit there, a little bit more back over here, some different stuff there... Who edited this thing for him? Along those same lines, the book's organization could use some work. The "essays" making up the second half of the book are as muddled as the "history" of the first half. They should get their own "Part II" instead of simply having different chapter names. Throughout, compute the ratio of "might/could have/may" to "did/was/had" and you'll understand how imprecise a view of Jefferson this is. Halliday himself muses on the transience of historical understanding. Better for him to take it to heart, and focus on the hard facts than try to read sheep's entrails to discern what might have been. Certainly Jefferson deserves better than this! Certainly American Heritage deserves better than this! By the way, wouldn't this suffice, instead of 250 pages of gumming the subject to death?: 1. TJ had a 10-year, very sexual marriage to Martha. He may have promised her on her deathbed not to remarry. 2. Sally Hemings was Martha's half-sister. 3. Perhaps out of family relation and resemblance, or perhaps out of his horniness and her availability, Tom/Sally were perfect for each other. 4. Why else would TJ have freed her offspring? He freed none of his other slaves; instead they were sold after his death to cover his debts. Buy the book. Read the book. Don't believe you "understand" TJ any better after having done so.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
13 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A disappointingly Freudian treatment of Jefferson, May 6, 2001
This review is from: Understanding Thomas Jefferson (Hardcover)
When I first picked up Understanding Thomas Jefferson to read, I was most aware of E.M. Halliday's credentials as a writer, and I had very high expectations. In a few respects the book delivered, especially in its attack upon best-selling historian Joseph J. Ellis for his implication that Jefferson opted for celibacy after his wife died. Jefferson was then not yet 40, in remarkable physical condition, and enjoyed being among women. However, Mr. Halliday pushed his Freudian analysis a bit far and made that and his forays into existentialist behavior the principal bases for our supposed "understanding" of the complex Thomas Jefferson. The narrowness of the author's approach to judgment was a letdown. So long as the author was entering the realm of reasonable speculation, I would have thought he might pay considerably more attention to the influence of Jefferson's father, Peter, and that of other strong males, mentors, and intellectual companions of both sexes in Jefferson's life. Surprisingly, though, Mr. Halliday was not quite so thorough in his examination of the available Jefferson literature as one could hope. As a result, he made a few important factual missteps and left several doors unopened. I happened to catch an interview of the author on C-Span after I read his book and heard him compound errors by tossing an 1815 Jefferson observation into the mix of factors leading him to Sally Hemings in the late 1780s. On the whole this book was a disappointing treatment of Jefferson which left me no more understanding of the Sage of Monticello at the finish than I was at the beginning.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
If you could read one book on Jefferson, don't choose this one!, May 8, 2006
I started out very excited by this book. Based on my readings, I was convinced that Jefferson had had a liason with Hemmings, unquestionably based on the circumstanital evidence. (I did not know about the DNA testing at the time). I was looking forward to this book because I knew Halliday thought it to be fact, and I didnt want a biographer who masked over real history. It started out as an easy read. It quickly disintegrated into a book of sleazy guesswork and disjointed facts. I knew more about Jefferson's sex life than I did his presidency. I cant remember EVEN ONE mention of who his vice president was. Did he even talk about the election? Not that I recall. I do remember Halliday speculating about whether Jefferson masturbated. (forgive the image but you get the idea now of what Im talking about). The time chronology is all over the place, nothing is in order. The tone changes chapter by chapter. One minute he is talking about Hemmnings, the next chapter is spent degrading all the other authors who have written about Jefferson, of course none of them have it right according to Halliday. I have never seen an author so unprofessional to spend an ENTIRE chapter (entitled "Blinkered Historians) on why the other biographers were wrong. In retrospect, even if David Ellis did have it wrong about the Hemmings affair (which he did), I feel my time would have been spent much more wisely reading him, even if it is a little harder to read. I also fealt that Hallidays own personal beliefs and interests seeped into the book. Because some parts of the book were not credible, I wasnt sure what to believe. Examples, the specuations about the sexual details. Another example was when he claimed Adams believed that government and power should be intrusted to the aristocratic and the rich families of America. That is really not true, while Adams did belive that the federal gov't needed certain powers, he did not believe in elite rule. He was criticized for being a monarchist in his time, but that was really nothing more than politics, he believed in a multi-faceted gov't. Okay so that was a tangent, long story short, I fealt that I walked away much less enlightend about jefferson than I had hoped.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|