14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This is my favorite book in the world, July 23, 1999
By A Customer
John Sayles is better known as a film maker, but he's an even better novelist. This book is the best example of why. If one flashback chapter can lead to a movie as good as "Matewan," imagine what the rest of the book is like. For a more playful story with equally serious themes, try "Pride of the Bimbos," too.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
Chapter 10..., September 14, 2011
This review is from: Union Dues: A Novel (Paperback)
... is some of the best writing I've ever come across. Thought so 30 years ago when I first read it -- and still think so.
Maybe it's a short story in the middle of a novel, maybe it's the jumping-off point for a screenplay -- either way, it's pretty damn good.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
high expectations lead to disappointment, October 24, 2011
After reading Sayles most recent novel, A Moment in the Sun, I was eagerly anticipating going back to one of his first, Union Dues. Perhaps I had too high expectations because I was disappointed with Union Dues.
The story takes place in 1969 between the West Virginia mines and Boston focusing on the struggles of unions and job seekers. But, the story felt very didactic, more oriented toward teaching a lesson than developing complex characters.
The main characters are a dad, Hunter (mine worker), and his two sons, Dawson, a Vietnam vet and Hobie, a 17 year old football star who runs away to Boston. The focus is ostensibly Hunter journeying to Boston to find his son because he never really knew him and couldn't just let him leave (this kind of motive underlies the novel building its philosophical and moral lessons). In some ways the tone reminds me of Sinclair Lewis, very much a criticism of unions (this is not a pro union novel, but the criticism does not come from those who think unions ruin profit or capitalism but that the men who take over unions become power hunger manipulators and don't work for the common man).
Most of the novel takes place in Boston as Hobie joins a "revolutionary cell" to fight the capitalist pigs (there are mentions of the weathermen, etc), Hunter arrives and can't get a decent job and has to apply for unemployment which he finds despicable as he searches for Hobie, and Dawson lays around getting unemployment, doing nothing and wishing he hadn't done "such horrible things" in Vietnam. The characters are various levels of cliche. It's difficult to even understand why Hobie is in Boston--he says he's hunting for Dawson, but he doesn't do any hunting. He just moons around the revolutionary house wishing that one of the women would go to bed with him (and using his running ability to help commit revolutionary acts). Hunter does a bit of hunting before he settles into this kind of attempt to get in the union rut and a relationship with a local woman.
The novel ends rather abruptly and without any hope of substantial change for any of the characters. It's not a happy picture and it's not a very satisfying read if what you are looking for is the development of a historical moment from a complex perspective (like Sayles does in a moment in the sun). If you are going to read Sayles, I would highly recommend Moment in the Sun.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No