Customer Reviews

The Union Soldier in Battle: Enduring the Ordeal of Combat

5 star:		(5)
4 star:		(2)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

In this rather short book, Earl Hess goes into detail about what combat was like for the Northern Solier in the American Civil War. Using mainly letters written by veterans, the book explains why most Northern soldiers were able to endure the horrors of Civil War combat, and how this experience shaped their perspective of the conflict.

I found the book fascinating. It really gets into the personal history of the war, as seen through the eyes of thos who fought it. If you are looking for a glimpse into the intensity of Civil War fighting, this book will open your eyes to what it may have been like. The only reason I did not give this book five stars is that the writing is rather dry, and merely factual during certain chapters.

I recommend this book for anyone interested in learning more about the Civil War combat experience of the Northern Soldier. It was gruesome, noisy, confusing, exhilirating, and harrowing. How so many were able to endure this hardship and keep fighting until the war was won still remains somewhat of a mystery to me.

Author Earl Hess has defined the Union soldier in this interesting book covering many topics. Hess has taken a fresh look at soldiering and has brought the psychology of the soldier mind together with insightful material. Topics facing soldiers such as enlisting, fighting battles, defining courage, knowing war, memories and the daily grind of war has been presented in a great format. Hess adds quotes from soldiers that enhance the chapters and bring things to a closer personal level. Hess also explains how soldiers coped after the war and how they filtered back into society. This an excellent book that gets into the psychological mind set of the Union soldier and is not a book like Hardtack Coffee that covers more material topics. To understand the Union soldier this a great reference tool that helps get inside of the minds of these fighting men. 5 STARS!

This study of combat during the Civil War is perhaps the best of the books on the soldiers during that war--and I wrote two of the others. Hess brings the "face of battle" approach pioneered by John Keegan to the Civil War.

Earl Hess brings his deep knowledge of Civil War history to bear in this study of the Union soldier in combat. Hess describes in great detail the shock and horror of battle, and how soldiers attempted to cope with this surreal world. Right down the alley of SAVING PRIVATE RYAN; those interested in warfare and the fate of the individual soldier will find this book to be fascinating.

Earl J. Hess's book "The Union Soldier in Battle: Enduring the Ordeal of Combat" is a lucid and convincing account of the Union soldier's adjustment to the harrowing experience of combat. Hess's straightforward use of soldiers' correspondence and memoirs presents the reader with an illustrative candor which boldly challenges any romantic depiction of Civil War combat. Before the Union soldier first "saw the elephant", he was often infused by a sense of idealistic patriotism; a romantic notion of war which inspired him to enlist. Hess posits that these soldiers adjusted well to combat, however, and used their common bond with other soldiers to control their fear of both combat and dying. Sure, they retreated at the first sight of combat but Hess tends do defend this by factoring in human nature. We all get scared. In fact, Hess points out that retreating was also used as a strategic motivator. The author's rather humanistic portrayal of the Union soldier suggests that he was not perfect but, at the same time, he knew that he had a job to do and to live up to his part of the bargain. Hess's portrayal of the Union soldier as a pragmatic yet idealistic fighter is most interesting. The grim descriptions of the battlefield given by soldier accounts vividly bring the Union soldier's transformation from civilian to soldier alive. I found this book to be a refreshing read in the sense that it presented a side of the Union soldier that needs to be examined further. It is a needed accompaniment to Bell Wiley's "Billy Yank". In this era of post-Vietnam scholarship on the effects of combat on soldiers, this is a welcome book. The primary research was detailed and the presentation was clear. The only thing preventing me from giving it "5 stars" was that I feel the author may have covered the effects of the Emancipation Proclamation on the ideology of the Union soldier and his reasons for fighting the war. Overall, a great book.

This is the sort of historical writing that I really find interesting: the study of mentalities among a group of people engaged in highly stressful activity. Hess does wonderfully at describing what battle was like and setting forth the ways in which it challenged men's courage. I found, however, that some of his analysis seemed forced. He makes statements which are not really supported by his sources. For example, he makes the claim that veteran soldiers were more likely to call truces with the enemy to trade coffee and tobacco and so on because they felt more self-confident than new recruits. But in fact, other sources I have read indicate that such truces were more common early in the war, before the soldiers got to taking it all so seriously. In other places, too, Hess makes claims about what was going through the soldiers' minds without really supporting these claims with quotes. He gives an interesting analysis of postwar viewpoints and the way veterans psychologically justified the hell they had gone through. I do wish that he or a colleague would write a similar study of Confederate soldiers, particularly on postwar viewpoints, since that would seem to be where they would differ the most.

A fascinating look at the men who fought and how they coped with the horrors of the battlefield. This is the only book of its type that I have found which provides an in-depth look at the range of emotions that soldiers felt as they headed into battle. It has quickly become one of my favorite books about the Civil War. Highly recommended.

So writes Pennsylvanian Jacob Heffelfinger after his first battle in the Civil War. Heffelfinger is one of the dozens of veterans whose letters and memoirs Hess examined to write this study of the Union soldier under fire. His chapters examine the visual, auditory, olfactory, and tactile experience of battle; strategies for coping with battle-fear before, during, and after the shooting; and the ways in which combat veterans in the Civil War remembered their experiences (this, in the final chapter, may be the book's single most important contribution).

Unhappily, the book is fundamentally flawed by Hess' strange claim that the Civil War veteran was a victor over his dreadful experiences rather than a victim, and so he seems to appreciate neither the poignancy of the firsthand accounts he cites or the horrific post-war psychological and physical damage endured by the veterans. A book published the same year Hess's appeared, Eric T. Dean's _Shook Over Hell: Post-Traumatic Stress, Vietnam, and the Civil War_, is a more sensitive study, as is Gerald Linderman's _Embattled Courage: The Experience of Combat in the American Civil War_ (1987), a deservedly classic treatment with which Hess explicitly disagrees. In short, Hess deserves our gratitude for the wealth of firsthand testimony he cites. But his analysis of its significance falls short.

This book gives a wonderful overview of the experience of the combat soldier in the Civil War. It is not as broad as "Embattled Courage," and therefore holds the reader on the battlefield, and away from the distractions of home, school, church, etc. Down to the comraderie, and the comfort of "the touch of the elbow," this book, I feel, should be required reading for every Civil War reenactment group, North or South