Amazon.com: The Universe Within: A New Science Explores the Human Mind (9780671252588): Morton hunt: Books

Buy Used
Used - Good See details
$3.99 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Universe Within: A New Science Explores the Human Mind
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Universe Within: A New Science Explores the Human Mind [Hardcover]

Morton hunt (Author)
4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  

Book Description

February 26, 1982
The exploration of a new science - the humand mind. A wonderfully readable, lucid account of the latest discveries and theories of cognitive science - the study of how our minds work.

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Product Details

  • Hardcover: 415 pages
  • Publisher: Simon & Schuster; First Edition edition (February 26, 1982)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0671252585
  • ISBN-13: 978-0671252588
  • Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.4 x 1.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.5 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #906,613 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.7 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars This is the book that set me on my way as a scientist, February 2, 2002
By 
I was an Econ major until I read this book - I now have an undergraduate degree in cognitive science and a DPhil in neuropsychology. This book turned me on the fun stuff that is the science of the mind. It led me to Douglas Hofstadter, on to Oliver Sacks and a host of other authors and I was so influenced by it that I mentioned Morton Hunt in the dedication to my dissertation. Buy this book if you want to be captivated by what we are beginning to understand about how the mind works - how we think, remember and solve problems and engage in conversation.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars 1982 Morton Hunt how we think or not, December 26, 2001
Yep it is all of the fun questions that we need answering. In addition, Morton tries to explain how and why. The back cover has a prominent selection that explains the book better than the introduction.

The prewired brain:
Improving your memory:
Do we ever totally forget anything?
How logical are we? Not very.
How much does it matter?
Do you "pigeonhole" other people, experiences, events?
Is it bad to do so?

Where children's ideas come from:
Solving new problems:
Mind over computer:

There are several illustrations and tests. No breakthrough theories.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


6 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Decision making is primarily intuitive,inductive,and analogical, October 18, 2005
By 
Michael Emmett Brady "mandmbrady" (Bellflower, California ,United States) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   
Hunt has done an excelent job in this book in discussing the field called cognitive science.I read this book in 1983 just after I had submitted my dissertation on J M Keynes's logical theory of probability at the University of California,Riverside.I discovered that there was nearly a one-to one onto correspondence between the major conclusions of cognitive science ,with respect to decision making ,reported in Hunt's book and the conclusions and analysis contained in chapter III and Part III of Keynes's 1921 A Treatise on Probability.There are five fundamental conclusions reported by Hunt.First,"Deductive thinking is an information-rearranging process..."while"...inductive thinking is an information-extending process...",(Hunt,p.157).Second,the most important form of reasoning is"...by analogizing from a set of similarities",(Hunt,p.158).Analogical reasoning is plausible reasoning based on degrees of likeness,similarity,and resemblance.It is reasoning based on a qualitative,comparative and/or interval estimate approach to probability that incorporates the mathematical laws of mathematical probability only as a limiting case.It must be pointed out here that Hunt fails to challenge the Tversky-Kahneman error that conflates probabilistic reasoning with the limiting case of mathematical probability laws.These laws are deductive in nature and not inductive(Hunt,p.184).Induction plays THE central role in understanding our world through learning by experience.Third,inductive thinking,while error prone,eventually leads to error correction.Fourth,"induction refers to those processes by which we group similar objects into categories,or recognize patterns that happen in some regular order",(Hunt,p.158).Thus,pattern recognition is fundamental to problem solving,teaching how to solve problems,and scientific discovery.Scientific discovery is the accidental and/or systematic result of pattern recognition applied to new data and/or a new problem.A scientist who makes a fundamental breakthrough "sees" or "intuits"or "perceives" something in the new data or information that his colleagues are unable to recognize.Finally,evolutionary processes have developed the mind's inductive capacity and it is this developed capacity to reason inductively that is the major reason for the supremacy of the human species,both to destroy and to create.I have deducted one star because practically all of these points were made long ago by John Maynard Keynes.Keynes never made the mistake of conflating probabilistic reasoning based on analogy,similarity,and pattern recognition with the purely mathematical laws of mathematical probability.These laws hold as a limiting case.The fact that in many decision situations it "appears" that the decision maker is violating the mathematical laws of probability is explained by the fact that in many such situations the prerequisites needed to apply the mathematical laws of probability are not satisfied.Keynes would never make the claim that most decision makers do not understand the concept of regression to the mean(see Hunt,pp.186-187).Regression to the mean automatically assumes that a unique probability distribution fits the data.The usual assumption is that a normal distribution fits the data.The fact is that in many instances such assumptions are false.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:



i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...