Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
37 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Faculty will read this book and say, "Ah, yes!", January 18, 1997
By A Customer
Readings describes why he feels that universities are in ruins and what faculty might do about it. He traces the history of the university from Kant to the present time and argues that it has gone through three phases or forms: the University of Ideas (Kant), the University of Culture (Humboldt), and now the University of Excellence (based on measuring quality). His argument is that the U has now become a business, and "excellence" is now being defined in business, rather than in intellectual, terms. Perhaps the most important point that he makes in the book is that he feels excellence has no intellectual reference point.
His conclusion is that there is no turning back. If faculty do nothing, then the option is for them to mourn or to be scorned...unless they make the attempt to look for "open spaces" where they can focus their work on Thinking (he uses an uppercase T on purpose). He especially encourages Thinking that spans disciplines. He also argues that scholars need to be aware that, in the University of Exellence, accounting systems prevail. In pursuing these open spaces, scholars must still be able to provide what he calls "techo-bureaucrats" with the numbers that they need to run their accounting systems.
Sadly, Readings believes that the University has lost its soul and, today, is no longer the pivotal cultural institution that it once was. To the contrary, he suggests that it is now a business that is being evaluated as a business and is in competition with other businesses.
This book will not be an "easy read" for many. Readings' meanders: making a point here and drawing a conclusion there. Some administrators might not finish reading it for that reason. Having said that, anyone who is interested in the present status and future direction of higher education should read this book. It is a sobering and important piece of work.
Frank Fear,
Michigan State University
|
|
|
30 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
An important book on the university situation with few flaws, May 20, 1996
By A Customer
Bill Readings' book is an important contribution to the
growing debate about the functions of the University in the
present world. It was published posthumously as Bill died in
that tragic plane crash of the American Eagle flight between
Indianpolis and Chicago on October 31st, 1994.
Readings' book is important because it carries us beyond and
above the usual debates about excellence to bring us to a
different level of analysis. After recounting the German
foundations of the current conceptualization of the university,
Readings show how the present obsession for excellence betrays
these 19th-century ideals under the guise of of preserving
them, and how excellence has actually become a management tool
which, in actuality, refers back to a principle of performance. But
Readings' book is also important because it does not suggest
we should simply hark back to Humboldtian ideals or those
of the German idealists; instead, he invites us to construct
new meaning to words that have perhaps been used too lightly
and cynically in the recent past -- namely "value" (instead
of excellence) and "thought" (instead of performance). Readings'
suggestion - or rather challenge - is to propose the construction
of a materialistic content to such idealistic terms. His untimely
death has transformed a challenge into a legacy - an important
one, I might add.
Based on a wide knowledge of university conditions (Germany,
France, Britain, the U.S.), armed with the critical tools
of contemporary philosophy (in particular Derrida, Lyotard and
some of the best practitioners of cultural studies), yet
constantly skeptical of any one line of thought, this book
displays considerable erudition, yet adorns it with much wit
and a lightness of touch that academics should practice more
often. Sometimes, however, the analysis moves a bit too
quickly as when the author brashly criticizes the French
sociologist Bourdieu on the basis of a confusion between
culture and institution. But these minor irritants
notwithstanding, Readings' book remains a trailblazing
exercise that must not be ignored. Highly recommended.
|
|
|
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Still stage two, July 7, 2008
One reason why the critic from Publishers Weekly may be right about the book being incomplete is because Bill Readings died before finishing it as explained by Diane Elam in the Forward. This is pointed out as well by several other reviewers. The interpretation of the situation in the universities seems useful and interesting to me. My question concerns its applicability to many students and many universities. From my own experience it seems the second stage of university life as he describes it was still applicable to my student experience in the seventies but still in many ways appropriate to my own students today. What seems to create difficulties is the transition both for universities and individual students in them. Many students still expect the university of their choice to model a culture and assign them the role of the hero of the educational process, as BR describes it. But they are surrounded by students of the sort in the third stage and faced with a university that wants to cater to that third sort for all the reasons he points out. A question then remains, can a school within a school maintain that second sort of program in the face of such social momentum and if so, how can the right students be recruited and reassured that their goals are still viable?
This seems like the focus of his suggestions and it would have been great to see what specific practices he might have thought would have worked. Anything to avoid the sort of environment depicted in Tom Wolfe's book "I am Charlotte Simmons".
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|