14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not Leonard's best work, July 18, 2007
I was disappointed in this one. The first several chapters spent way too much time and space reviewing the plot from the previous Leonard book that this sequel follows. As always, he has created a cast of characters that are worth watching, but there's too much backstory and too many scenes that don't really contribute to the flow of action. I'm truly sorry, because I've always been an Elmore Leonard fan. I hope the next one is better.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Octogenarian Marvel, September 4, 2007
I remember reading an interview with Elmore Leonard in which he said that if a writer is constantly casting about for different ways to use the verb "said" he's wasting his time. The key is the dialogue itself, not how one describes its utterance.
As I marveled at Up in Honey's Room's succinct, unexpected, witty dialogue, I was reminded of Leonard's statement again and again. Sure, this novel features characters that are a bit too outrageous, and sure, a few of the plot developments are worthy of an eye roll or two. Is it his best work? No, but please, make no mistake: This is a lean, funny book.
I hope that I can appreciate good writing like this when I'm 82... which is how old Leonard was when he wrote this novel!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Too many viewpoints, not much happening, June 28, 2007
World War II is winding toward a conclusion in this semi-farcical Leonard mystery. Two German prisoners have escaped and U.S. Marshall Carl Webster is hot on their trail. Webster tracks them to Detroit, where he's pretty sure they've connected with Nazi "provocateur" Walter Schoen.
Leonard uses multi-viewpoints to tell the story, and that's part of the problem with the book. Not very many of this cast of clowns are very likable or interesting. The title character, Honey Deal, Walter's former spouse, is the worst of the lot. Why in the world would a woman who looks like a Miss America contestant marry somebody like Walter Schoen, a Heinrich Himmler look-a-like? She also has the morals of an alley cat, unable to make up her mind whether she wants Carl Webster or former tank commander Jurgen Schrenk.
Carl Webster's background is also a bit hard to accept. The "Hot Kid" has a reputation as a hard-nosed G-Man, but he lets one of the incompetent Nazi spies get the drop on him. Even his wife is larger than life. She's a marine who teaches gunners how to fire a machine gun out of the back of a plane. Then there's Bohdan Kravchenko, the crazy transvestite. Sigh!
The plot isn't much to speak of either. Walter's co-conspirators, led by Vera Mezwa, just don't seem to have their hearts in it. Jurgen Shrenk is more interested in becoming a rodeo bull rider than he is in any kind of sabotage. The closest they get to undermining the American war effort is a deluded plot to kill the president, and only one of them is interested. Leonard seems to realize nothing much is happening, so he throws in a couple of distracting murders, the motivation for which is completely baffling.
Leonard does seem to be having fun at times. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe the German word for pretty or beautiful is close to Schoen. Himmler was one of the ugliest men in record history. Also one of the escaped prisoners is named Otto Penzler, an editor at Mysterious Press. I sort of perked up when Penzler was seduced by an American con woman who needed a partner to help sell smuggled nazi contraband, but Leonard quickly drops this thread for the pedestrian stuff.
I've read about a half dozen Leonard novels. He's usually quite good at hooking the reader, then gets loose in the middle, before finishing strong. Nothing works here.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No