Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
14 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
From Myth to Reality:One Woman's Fascinating Journey, March 9, 2009
It is said that if you want the emotional truth of an era, read a novel, not a history book. In this day and time, a great memoir is a combination the two. In Eve Pell's "We Used to Own the Bronx: Memoirs of a Former Debutante," there is deep emotional truth that shatters the myths of the frivolous fifties, as well as the radical idealism of the sixties. An award-winning journalist, Pell is an intelligent, insightful, and courageous woman who fought hard for reality in the world around her and in her personal life. We, as readers, are lucky she was willing to share her journey.
|
|
|
13 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Radicalizing Eve Pell, March 8, 2009
We used to be neighbors, but I've only met Eve Pell a few times. After reading her `We Used to Own the Bronx' I feel that I've know her for ever. Her story is illuminating exposé of one of the most prominent early families in the country: wealthy as Croesus, but with all that privilege there was an unhealthy dose of tension. Eve takes us on her compelling journey from a life of servants and horses to elite schools to life as a socialite to radical activist and award winning journalist. Along the way, she found time to become a first-rate, long-distance runner. We get `skinny' on the Edwardian era leisure class with its obscure rules and prejudices that tend to insulate them from the real World but which can backfire causing angst, divorce, alcoholism and suicide. Couldn't put it down...
|
|
|
26 of 33 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Candide as Perp, May 6, 2009
Ms. Pell begins the first chapter of her book by observing: "I come from a family in love with itself." That sums up what's wrong with the book, the author and the family.
Actually, I know something about the family myself, since some of my ancestors were Pells. I tell people that the fortune zigged and my branch of the family zagged, but in truth, they swam in that pond until my great-grandmother married an Irish Catholic (a worse sin than marrying a Jew) and was disowned by the family. That my great-grandfather converted to Anglicanism didn't change anything.
If anything, Ms. Pell underemphasizes the family's egoism. The family used to house its archives in a townhouse in midtown Manhattan. They published a quarterly magazine about themselves. They published books about the family, such as one called something like "War Heroes of the Pell Family," listing page after page of able bodied men who avoided combat by snagging billets at supply depots and training commands.
The author's rare note of moderation is all the more unusual since the highs (and presumably the lows - they are, or were until this book came along, more private) are largely exaggerated. You can start with the title. The Pells never "owned The Bronx," the Morris family, older and far more accomplished than the Pells, owned most of it. The Pells owned a narrow, 9000 acre strip along the east coast of what is now The Bronx and Westchester County.
The truth of the matter is that the family has been in decline for 300 years, staying afloat by strategic, gold digging marriages with robber barons they had only distaste for. This seems to have had the effect of breeding all of the love and human emotion out of their family relationships.
To the younger members of such families, the Sixties must have seemed like a breath of fresh air. An enormous percentage of the leadership of the counterculture were people like Ms. Pell. It was a way of bringing down mummy and daddy while also feeling superior to the great unwashed with whom they associated in the Movement. And if things got out of hand, there was always daddy to send you lawyers, guns and money.
In truth, it was the family names that mattered to their fellow revolutionaries - just as it was the family name at the charity luncheons that mattered - but in the process, the Silver Spoon Radicals substituted an excessive love of their geneology with an excessive love of themselves.
This comes out most clearly in Ms. Pell's account of her days as a radical in San Francisco. She claims to have had qualms as the Black Panthers she supported killed fellow prisoners and guards, but she doesn't give a moment's thought to the victims' widows and orphans and grieving families. That changes when an upper class colleague of hers is crippled in an assassination attempt because of perceived disloyalty to the Black Panther cause. Then her eyes are opened - "I could be hurt!" - and she calls the police whom she previously considered "pigs." I would really have a lot more admiration for her character if she had behaved like the revolutionaries of Stalin's purges and prepared herself to die for her beliefs, even at the hands of her fellow conspirators. All we see here is that same Pell arrogance singling itself out as special.
The book itself reads like a long monologue with the author's psychiatrist, so much so that the reader wants to send her a bill for professional services rendered. She devotes an entire page to a single incident where her mother chastises a maid for shattering a family heirloom. Okay, okay, you want to shout, your mother had the grace of a fish wife. Get on with it.
And she seems only dimly aware that her father's coldness and distance may have had something to do with the fact that he had been cuckolded and abandoned by her mother only a few years into their marriage. He never ceased to love his wife and his whole life seems to have been ruined by her infidelity. There is a moving story there, but the author lacks the empathy to tell it.
None of this, by the way, is a WASP thing. It is an Old Money thing, especially Old Money which has become impotent. You can see the same thing in virtually every ethnic group from Indian maharajahs to Russian nobility. It must be a false gods/golden idols phenomenon. Just as greyhounds lose their character when they catch the mechanical rabbit at a race, so does being born into privilege strip one of something fundamental. They are rare individuals who inherit a fortune and use it to do something worthwhile.
Still, it is hard to dislike Ms. Pell. One tends to side with her mother's Irish maid, who, when she would see Ms. Pell would mutter "poor, poor thing." Ms. Pell started life's race miles behind normal people who have learned that the secret to life in America is flexibility, enterprise and a good heart, qualities her parents' prestige and money worked against. She had a lot of catching up to do, and if she made some wrong turns along the way, it was because her mediocre education and lack of family values made her grossly unprepared for modern life.
The best part of the book is her reconciliation with her mother and the support her sons show her (although true to form, we learn almost nothing about her boys: where did they go to school? what is significant in their lives? where is Ms. Pell's motherly pride?).
She portrays herself as a sort of Candide, which is a refreshing change from Cinderella, but I don't buy it quite. It's all about that ego. Maybe she can work on that as her next project.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|