42 of 47 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Occult Lover's Delight, February 17, 2000
This review is from: Vampires: The Occult Truth (Llewellyn Truth About Series) (Paperback)
I have read many non-fiction books about vampires, and this is by far the best. Konstantinos gives you a look back at the history of vampires and gives you an idea of what to believe. The greatest part of this book is in the chapter where the author reveals letters he has received from alleged vampires. According to one anonymous vampire, "We are real, we are many, we are forever....". That is my favorite quote from the book. He also informs you on how to ward off vampire attacks. I have never seen so much thorough and informative information before in a book based on the occult. This book slightly describes, but also eliminates, myth from the vampire legend. This book destroys the typical "Hollywood" vampire. From the moment I received this book, on Christmas, I couldn't put it down, not for a second. He also interviews vampire encounters, and he brings up the important point that since the first city was built, vampire legends have existed. This book was obviously, heavily researched. I have no bad points to emphasize about this book. It is perfectly detailed, discriptive, and informative from start to finish. In conclusion, I doubt you will find a more complete book on the possibility of vampires existing than this. It has already become a favorite book of mine.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent book! (for Occultists), November 26, 1998
By A Customer
This review is from: Vampires: The Occult Truth (Llewellyn Truth About Series) (Paperback)
As you can tell from the five-star-ranking I gave to this book, I think it's really a remarkably good book. Divided into four parts (Immortal blood-drinkers, mortal blood-drinkers, unconscious psychic vampires and conscious psychic vampires), it shows a rationality and believability you wouldn't normally expect from a "vampire book". However a *little* esoteric and/or occult knowledge is helpful understanding especially the part about defense against attacks from psychic vampires, i. e. you shouldn't be utterly allergic to the concept of aurae, astral travel and such. Therefore, this book is perfect for occultists, people interested in esoterics and goths of the a-little-more-serious kind - of these, everyone should have it! - , though simply "somewhat weird" to the rest. By the way, the style of writing is quite understandable to people not speaking english as a native tongue, too.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Mostly very sweet, but a few things bothered me, June 23, 2006
This review is from: Vampires: The Occult Truth (Llewellyn Truth About Series) (Paperback)
Konstantinos' book Vampires is mostly an interesting, easy to read, and well-written introduction to the phenomenon known as vampires; where they're from, what famous individuals from history who have inspired the modern view of vampires, how different the belief in vampires looked in different parts of the world, and so on.
Konstantinos, who for over fifteen years have researched the occult and written several books about most matters concerning the world of goth and the occult, manages to create a (mostly) pleasing mix of scepticism and belief, especially when it comes to historical tales about alleged "real" vampires where he thorough and informative explains how folklore easily can distort stories and how things that back in the days were taken as genuine evidence for the existence of vampires today turn out to be quite invalid.
But this scepticism doesn't last throughout the entire book. As soon as he gets to the section about psychic vampires - that is, vampires that prefer feeding on human energy instead of human blood - the perspective changes in an instant. From being both skeptical and critical in his approach Konstantinos now becomes a complete believer, as he starts talking about nightly attack by psychic vampires, a phenomenon that contains every single element from the phenomenon known as sleep paralysis (being incapable of movement, occurring right before waking up or going to sleep, a feeling of slight pressure on the chest, the notion that someone else is in the room, and so on). Obviously Konstantinos and his readers has every "right" in the world to believe in this, but it's quite surprising that he doesn't even mention the possibility that these nightly attacks are nothing but a very natural phenomenon which most people experience sometime during a lifetime.
This complete lack of scepticism took me by surprise, since he up till then had been critical about everything else he writes about. Yes, it's true that the book is mostly written for people who believe in the existence of magic and the supernatural - which becomes especially apparent at the end of the book - but still, approaching this section, like the rest of the book, with a critical mind wouldn't destroy Konstantinos' "occult reputation" (as far as I'm concerned, anyway), so it puzzles me as to why he writes the way he does.
And also, Konstantinos does have quite annoying tendency to keep telling the reader that future chapters and sections will deal with, and time and again he does this. Sure, this way of writing works excellent and can be very useful, but only to a certain extent, and after a while it usefulness simply transforms into something that you just don't want to be reminded of. Perhaps it's just me, but I couldn't help but to find this method extremely irritating in the long run.
However, Vampires is in the end a book for everyone, skeptics and believers alike, since Konstantinos makes sure to remind the reader that even something as strange as the supernatural deserves to be taken seriously. And this is, of course, very true. You might not agree with some of his ideas, but so what? Many people do, and this alone makes the field a valid one to study. Still, it wouldn't surprise me of he finds his largest audience among the ones inclined to believe in those exact things the established scientific community considers to be pure nonsense.
That didn't matter much to me though, because I still had a good time reading it, and I managed to learn something new in the process.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No