4 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
the best, June 16, 2007
This review is from: Van Gogh (DVD)
Along with Victor Erice's El Sol de Membrillo one of the few great films about a painter.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
Pialat's Van Gogh, January 23, 2012
This review is from: Van Gogh (DVD)
This is, without a doubt, the most brilliant film ever made about the tormented painter. Anyone who says otherwise is an imbecile. Jacques Dutronc is absolutely brilliant in the title role. He plays Van Gogh with an understated sense of mood. This is not a portrayal of an insane man. There is no ear-cutting scene or any manic type of behavior whatsoever. That has all been done before and director Pialat does a magnificent job of steering clear of it. Instead, the last 67 days of Van Gogh's life is captured with what might be called a "painting within a painting". Every scene is gorgeous, a true work of beautiful artistry. Though it is true that many of the things that happen may not be entirely accurate from what is historically known about the artist...somehow, I didn't care. This film is one of the greatest ever made, and for those of you who thought it was too long and boring, well, go see the puke that Hollywood churns out...For, in my opinion, this movie could have lasted forever.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Realistic settings - imaginary story, May 31, 2007
This review is from: Van Gogh (DVD)
This is a competent rendering of the last weeks in the life of the fine arts painter Vincent Van Gogh in the rivertown Auvers-sur-Oise northwest of Paris. It's strength is its locations that are very authentic and the French personalities and settings that Van Gogh experienced and that would be lacking in any film not set in France and likely made by a Frenchman. There are plenty of innocuous conversations, luncheons and garden and nature walks. The most interesting relationship in the film is between Vincent and Dr. Guichet who is physician, arts patron and friend to the artist. They live on opposite ends of town - the doctor and his daughter living in a large house surrounded by greenery and warbling birdsong and the transient artist who sets himself up in a gray garret by the train station with pot-bellied and mustachioed worker types living with their hard and testy wives.
While this production misses the mark in many ways - Dutronc's Van Gogh lacks a certain physical and verbal intensity to be expected in the artist - and there is the ongoing sense that we are on a controlled and clinical 1990s film set instead of in Auvers in 1890- this is probably the closest art aficionados will get to the story unless it is re-told using many of the realistic elements found in this film but with a better narrative and performative versimilitude. Dutronc as Van Gogh, perhaps to his credit, has no sense of celebrity or speciality in the film and the director re-inforces the blandness of events - even Van Gogh's "accident" with a pistol which ends the artist's life at age 37 years. If bland is to be read as "unexpected" or "surprised" by Van Gogh's suicidal tendencies (as with his jump in the river at an outdoor social), it makes little impact.
I generally enjoy French films for their pacing, French language and thematic and visual materials. This is one more French film par excellence (the dance scene at the café-concert is especially inspired and quirky). However, Pialat's Van Gogh is a little slow and not just because of impatient American sensibility. If you enjoy Van Gogh's art, there is very little painting in the movie as if Van Gogh was more occupied with other things such as women. This is aggravating as these last months of his life in Auvers was an especially productive time for his painting. Even if you enjoy French films and bio-pics this version may be better than bearable but is not completely satisfying. Settings are realistic - for example, the artist's garret where he was taken to die is "spot on." But the story is completely imaginative and personal and not wholly successful for that fact since the subject is Vincent Van Gogh and not someone who is either fictional or innocuous. Van Gogh is doing a marketing service for Pialat's filmmaking as much as Pialat is re-presenting the famous post-impressionist artist to audiences.
In this way the film is misleading - it sets out to be realistic in its settings but its story could be on the same level in terms of historical truth as A Sunday in the Country (the old artist in that film is not Renoir but...) In Van Gogh, performances are professional but lack cohesion. The film disappoints on the levels described but it is for now by far the best interpretation we francophiles and art lovers have on the subject of this endlessly fascinating and mysterious artist.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
