Customer Reviews


4 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Gothic tales of strange rites in our midst
This book contains two reprints of hard to find 19th century books. The first, Reed's -Six Months in a Convent-, is a factual if unsympathetic account by a former student and novice at an Ursuline convent school in Charlestown, Massachussetts. The convent was burnt to the ground by a mob shortly before the book was published, after one of the nuns attempted to escape...
Published on September 8, 2001 by S. Gustafson

versus
4 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Anti-Catholic bigotry at it's finest.
The editors comment "These convent tales by Reed and Monk are classics that must be read by those interested in American studies, popular culture, social and religious history, literature, and women's studies." is clearly taken from the "anything for a buck" school of "Publishing For Fun and Profit."

That's like saying "Mien Kemp" is must reading for everyone who seeks...

Published on September 19, 2003 by Frank Bear


Most Helpful First | Newest First

16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Gothic tales of strange rites in our midst, September 8, 2001
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Veil of Fear: Nineteenth-Century Convent Tales (Paperback)
This book contains two reprints of hard to find 19th century books. The first, Reed's -Six Months in a Convent-, is a factual if unsympathetic account by a former student and novice at an Ursuline convent school in Charlestown, Massachussetts. The convent was burnt to the ground by a mob shortly before the book was published, after one of the nuns attempted to escape and was persuaded to return, and a rumour was started that she was being held against her will. Reed died shortly after its publication, of tuberculosis that was said to be the result of the austerities she practised.

The second and more interesting of the two books is the more well known -Awful Disclosures of the Hotel-Dieu Nunnery- by Maria Monk. This is a fictitious libel, but its seriousness is undermined by the fantastic story told. A warren of secret passages and other Gothic trappings honeycomb the convent. The nuns are there basically to serve as a harem for Roman Catholic priests. Bizarre religious justifications are urged on the sisters for this practise. Any children they beget are first baptised, then slaughtered, and buried in a secret cemetery in the convent. This lurid tale is better told than Reed's; Monk, or her amanuenses, were better writers than Reed's.

Monk's tale, of course, was a deliberate hoax, made to capitalise on the fame and market for anti-Catholic horror stories. Since Reed's book became a best-seller, an even more extravagant story had every good prospect of making money. Unfortunately, not for Maria Monk, who made little from her tale. She had apparently suffered a brain injury in her childhood that left her unable to distinguish fact from fantasy, and as such was a perfect and convincing patsy for her collaborators in creating this tale. She also died young in distressing circumstances.

Roman Catholics were an exotic species in early 19th century America. They were the subject of more or less traditional hostility from Protestant Americans. The secrecy of the cloister, and the exotic rituals and language of the Roman Church, made the Gothic literary style a good fit to write anti-Catholic fictions. Maria Monk's book is in fact largely in the tradition of -The Monk-, Matthew Lewis's lurid fictional tale of a priest who made a bargain with the Devil for carnal pleasure.

At this distance, when the right of Roman Catholics to practice their faith stands on a firmer foundation than it did in the early 19th century, those who take pleasure in lurid Gothic tales may also take pleasure in these as well. They are not great literature. They are, however, historically significant. And if you can put aside indignation --- excited either by the tales they tell, or the fact that they were ever published --- they are simultaneously sad, exciting, and ironically amusing, just like the best Gothic fiction.

The editor's introduction, unfortunately, seems to advance airy academic notions that are unlikely, but all too familiar. The hypothesis is ventured that the destroyed convent was a threat to Bostonians and their "patriarchy" because it represented a community of sexually independent and educated women. Toni Morrison is invoked to support this notion. Reading her introduction, you could almost forget that she's talking about nuns bound by oaths of obedience to a male hierarchy. Rebecca Reed's indignant descriptions of debasing penances seem more informed by a spirit of liberation than the introduction.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


13 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating look into history, December 18, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: Veil of Fear: Nineteenth-Century Convent Tales (Paperback)
These tales aren't great literature, but they are an interesting read--fast-paced and determined to be sensational. Reed's tale led to the 1834 burning of the Ursuline convent near Boston, and Monk's highly fictionalized tale cashes in the interest surrounding the event. Both stories provide a fascinating look into the morass of nineteenth-century anti-Catholic prejudices and anti-immigrant xenophobia. The excellent introduction provides some much-needed context.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Anti-Catholic bigotry at it's finest., September 19, 2003
This review is from: Veil of Fear: Nineteenth-Century Convent Tales (Paperback)
The editors comment "These convent tales by Reed and Monk are classics that must be read by those interested in American studies, popular culture, social and religious history, literature, and women's studies." is clearly taken from the "anything for a buck" school of "Publishing For Fun and Profit."

That's like saying "Mien Kemp" is must reading for everyone who seeks a deeper understanding of Jewish religious history and their love of God.

Anti-Christian and specifically anti-Catholic bigotry is once again raising it's head from the cesspool of so called "politically correct" thinking. Make no mistake about this book and what it really is. It's a profit seeking re-publication of some of the most flaming, hate provoking semi-truths, half-truths and outright lies ever to be shamefully published in America.

Not too many years ago no reputable company would even think about offering this trash for sale. They wouldn't want their name to be associated with it. Today, Amason.com seems to be proud of it.

The biggest mistake the publisher made was not including a free sheet with every purchase; so the reader could fit in at the next KKK barbeque.

What next? A new publication of "Bigotry For Dummies"??? Wait a minute, maybe that's not a bad idea.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Maria Monk was slandered by the Catholic Church, October 12, 2005
By 
This review is from: Veil of Fear: Nineteenth-Century Convent Tales (Paperback)
After having heard Maria Monk's audio tape of her true story, I know that it is a lie to say that her story in this book was a hoax. The leaders of the Catholic Church would, of course, want to have people believe that she was lying, but they are the true liars. They lie about the reason for every one of their satanic rituals. Anyone interested in the satanic background of the Catholic Church should read The Two Babylons by Alexander Hislop. Maria Monk cared deeply about the Catholic people who were going to die and go to hell because they never trusted what God said in the Bible. They believe in penances, purgatory, indulgences, worship of graven images, etc. etc. which are spoken against by God in the Bible. We are saved by being born again through a saving faith in Jesus Christ. He died once for all, and priests are all liars because they would have people believe they can somehow sacrifice Him over and over again on their demon alters. Maria Monk's testimony reveals a true witness for the saving grace of Jesus Christ. That this book, or any other book, has tried to slander her by saying it is fiction, reveals how far the devil can go to try to keep his deception alive and well that the Catholic Church is "Christian." Any born again Christian recognizes that the Catholic Church is full of pagan rituals that are evil and satanic. Read the Bible and the truth will set you free. May God bless Maria Monk for her braveness in telling her story in the face of evil.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Veil of Fear: Nineteenth-Century Convent Tales
Veil of Fear: Nineteenth-Century Convent Tales by Nancy Lusignan Schultz (Paperback - September 1, 1999)
$26.95
In Stock
Add to cart Add to wishlist