The Vinland Map and the Tartar Relation: New Edition [Hardcover]

R. A. Skelton (Author), Thomas E. Marston (Author), Mr. George D. Painter (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: January 24, 1996

The Vinland Map, dated to about AD1440 - at least 50 years before Columbus landed in the Americas - is a map of the world that shows an outline of the northeast American coast and a legend describing its discovery in about 1000 by Leif Eiriksson, the Norseman from Greenland. The map was published by Yale University Press in 1965 and generated much debate. Chemical analysis of the ink later suggested the map might be a forgery, but recent appraisals of both scientific and humanist evidence argue that it is indeed authentic. Now this classic of historical cartography is available in a new edition. It reprints unaltered the original text on the Vinland Map and an account of Friar John of Plano Carpini's mission to the Mongols from 1245 to 1247, with which the map had at some stage been bound. To this have been added a new introduction by George D. Painter who discusses the verification of the map's authenticity; a new essay by Wilcomb E. Washburn, Director of the Smithsonian's American Studies Programme, on the map's provenance and the tests that have been performed on it; and a new discussion of the map's compositional and structural aspects by Thomas A. Cahill and Bruce H. Kusko, of the Crocker Historical and Archaeological Projects at the University of California, Davis, USA. There is also an account by Laurence C. Witten II, the rare-book dealer who sold the map to the benefactor who donated it anonymously to the Yale University Library.

Product Details

• Hardcover: 368 pages
• Publisher: Yale University Press (January 24, 1996)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0300065205
• ISBN-13: 978-0300065206
• Product Dimensions: 11.8 x 9.6 x 1.6 inches
• Shipping Weight: 4.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,102,965 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

24 of 24 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Fake or not, an intruiging book, June 18, 2000

By 

Lisa Carey "axelcarey" - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The Vinland Map and the Tartar Relation: New Edition (Hardcover)

The Vinland Map purports to be a 15th century map depicting Vikingexploration of North America centuries before Columbus. If genuine,the Vinland map is one of the great documents of Westerncivilization; if fake, it's an astoundingly clever forgery and Yale University has egg on its face. The first edition of the book in question, The Vinland Map and Tartar Relation, announced the discovery to the world in 1965. To commemorate the thirtieth anniversary, YUP published a second edition, adding a few new essays in support of the map's authenticity.

Of the controversy over its authenticity little more can be said in this review. The book itself covers some of the important objections (e.g. the presence of titanium in the ink), but slights or ignores much of the philological and historical criticism of recent years. (The web contains a certain amount of such criticism.) Lay readers may come away with the impression that the academic world is solidly behind the map, although this is far from the case.

Nevertheless, if you're interested in the Vinland Map this is the one essential book to own. It includes high-quality black and white plates of the map, together with text and translation of the legends and suchnot. The map was at one point bound with a manuscript known as the Tartar Relation (Historia Tartorum), itself a fascinating specimen of medieval geographical knowledge. As the circumstances of its production and replication are critical to the authenticity of the map, a full text and translation is also included.

4.0 out of 5 stars After almost half a century, still worth consulting on the Vinland Map controversy, September 19, 2011

By 

James J. Bloom (Silver Spring, MD USA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The Vinland Map and the Tartar Relation: New Edition (Hardcover)

When the so-called Vinland map was first revealed to the public in 1965 by Yale University, who had purchased it under still mysterious circumstances (the original owner/seller wanted to remain anonymous) it threatened to overturn everything one believed about pre-Columbian nautical knowledge of the lands westward across the Atlantic from Europe. It was more or less accepted that Viking expeditions had explored Canada's northeastern shore centuries before Columbus and even set up a short-lived colony among the Intuit. But the map, if authentic, would mark the first time (circa 1450, if the advocates are to be believed) that the New World is represented on a world map based on exploration rather than theology or fable. It would be a bombshell indeed if the map could be authenticated. The Viking expeditions of the 11th and 12th centuries had thus far not yielded any maps and charts, as the Northmen were not cartographers but "sea sense" navigators. So Yale commissioned a conference of scholars to present a thorough examination of all points of contention. The published proceedings are represented in this fascinating volume. I had tried to obtain the updated (1995) edition, but the bookseller sent me the original edition by mistake. However, reviews of the updated version have claimed that it did not present anything radically new from the 1965 version. I would recommend this book (or the new edition) to anyone who is interested in this still unsettled controversy. One school argues for authenticity, while another claims the map is a very clever and painstaking forgery. After reading this book, it might still be useful to consult more recent studies, such as that by Karen Siever, as well as the proceedings of a 1970s conference to further debate the findings.