Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Spoiled by success?, January 21, 2002
This review is from: Vitals (Hardcover)
How can such a good writer as Bear produce such a loser? I envision it happened like this. Bear had the germ of the idea for Vitals and had perhaps even begun writing it when his agent or editor said "Hey, Greg. Darwin's Radio has become a mainstream best seller! See if you can repeat with this one, and you can make the BIG breakthrough! Action is where it's at, baby. Conspiracy! Keep it moving. Be sure to include some gruesome violence or torture, the more perverted the better." Perhaps against his better judgment (at least, I hope his judgmentis better than that), Bear tried to comply, but he writes SF, not thrillers, and he is clearly out of his element. Instead of another Darwin's Radio we got Michael Crichton meets John LeCarre on a bad day. This scenario explains a lot. Like why the first part of the book was pretty good and engaged our interest quickly. And why the second part fell down so badly; the plot became increasingly gimmicky and farfetched, and even the writing deteriorated. And finally it explains why the plot became so convoluted that even the author didn't know how to explain the puzzle and simply failed to do so. This book will certainly NOT be a bestseller, so Bear may be expected to return to writing the good SF that readers like me have enjoyed for many years. However, the next time I think I'll wait before I invest my money in the hardback!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Not up to Greg's standard, July 14, 2003
**1/2 It beats being stuck on the beach with nothing to read. I've enjoyed all of Greg Bear's books that I've read so far. This one just doesn't cut the mustard. It starts out with all his cylinders clicking as usual. We get some convincing, heart-in-mouth deep sea exploration footage. We get a plausible and intriguing science fiction premise about how a bit of archaic bacteriology could turn us all into Lazarus Long, and it really makes sense that it leads to our hero poking around in the Juan De Fuca trench. We get a couple of neat scientists we'd like to see a bit more of, and we get an unsettling, mysterious series of phone calls from dead people. Unfortunately, the phone calls remain mysterious - or at least only lamely explained. The well thought out longevity theme gets swallowed up in a slapped together bacterial mind control theme. Characters we cared about disappear, and characters we never get time to know wander on and off stage. In short, it's a terrific first reel. But don't buy any popcorn, because you may find yourself ready to leave the theater before you get to the bottom of the bucket. Bear can do, and always has done, better than this. And the first third shows he still has the stuff. I won't be dissuaded from trying out his next offering.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
The Rule of Paranoia, February 19, 2002
This review is from: Vitals (Hardcover)
This could have an exciting, gripping techno-thriller. This could have been a deep examination into the hows, whys, and moral correctness of immortality. This could have been a strong expose of how cutting edge research into 'fringe' areas of science is funded and the influence such funding has on the results and how they are used. Unfortunately, we get none of these. At the start, we find Hal Cousins on a deep bathyscaph dive to try and collect specimens of truly primitive bacteria that he thinks hold the key to the biological 'clock' that seems to control aging in all higher lifeforms. During the dive, the bathyscaph's driver, for no apparent reason, attacks Hal, and later, after surfacing, commits apparent suicide by jumping into a very cold sea. This whole scene does nothing but confuse the reader, as at this early stage of the book, none of the characters have been developed enough to allow the reader to see that the behavior of both people on the sub is slowly becoming aberrant and psychotic. I was very close to closing up the book at this point and putting it on the shelf as not worth reading. Given what followed, this impulse should have been followed. From the initial reasonable scientific premise that Bear starts with, the plot continues to thicken with impossible conspiracies, improbable connections to biological research done in 1930's Russia, paranoid and schizophrenic characters, and sudden jumps in the later stages of the book to new characters who are there apparently only to help further confuse the plot, rather than any rational development of the original idea. True character development is almost nil and the actions of the fairly large cast often seem to have no logical basis. Some characters are introduced and then almost immediately dropped, leading to just another stubbed off plot thread. This book either needed a lot more pages to fully develop all the plot threads and characters, or the entire focus of the book needed to be narrowed down to a single set of ideas that were consistently developed. As it is, we have a mish-mash of partially developed plot lines and thematic ideas, none of which are fully satisfying or resolved, which Bear effectively admits with his closing round-up of questions that the book has not answered. This one is far from Bear's best.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|