Most Helpful Customer Reviews
128 of 136 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Great Paradox, May 27, 2000
We live in the most technologically advanced country in the world, yet our citizens seem to be extremely scientifically illiterate. Does it seem possible that congress would hold a hearing on why a gentleman was refused a patent on a machine that seemingly has a higher energy output than input, which violates the first law of thermodynamics? I have often laughed at the Indiana legislature that many, many years ago passed a law fixing pi at 3.14. But here is Trent Lott and his pompous brethren now holding a hearing on a machine that the physicists of the nation have said is a fraud. As is typical at a congressional hearing the egocentric politicians made speeches instead of asking questions. Then Senator Glenn asked a few pertinent questions that caused the committee to finally sniff disaster. The matter was dropped. Later there was another hearing on the cold fusion matter in which congress was again embarrassed by its total scientific ignorance. How did our fine representatives react to being publicly humiliated by these science debacles? Well, in 1995 they abolished the Office of Technology Assessment whose purpose was to advise congress on scientific and technical issues. Why seek advice when you are already infallible? This book provides the reader with a variety of scientific frauds that have hoodwinked not only congress, but also the nation. Sadly the media often further the cause of misinformation by presenting untruths as truths. They find it much more entertaining to present pseudo-science in a manner that suggests it might all be for real. Mr. Park also discusses how the media helped create the flurry over Electromagnetic Force (EMF) which proved to be total ado over nothing (a good book to read on how the media creates phony epidemics and trends is Culture of Fear by Barry Glassner). The author also decries the efforts of New Agers to misappropriate the terms of physics to espouse their theories (read also an interesting chapter on junk science in Wendy Kaminer's book Sleeping With Extraterrestrials.) This is an excellent read for those interested in real science, even though the scientific stupidities presented will have you pulling your hair and rending your garments. The problem with the book is that it is much too short. Park just gets going, and whoops its page 213 and time to stop. This topic could easily fill a volume twice as thick. Let's hope there is a sequel. Oh... one other matter. Another reviewer is distressed at author Park's dismissal of ESP when there is "a good body of hard evidence to support it". Park dismisses it because, as he states, the National Academy of Sciences undertook a complete review of all of the literature on the subject going back 130 years, and could find no scientific justification for its existence in the research that was studied. Park goes on to discuss why some people hang on desperately to theories despite continual research failures.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
67 of 74 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
It's Physics versus Fantasies, May 12, 2000
For years, Robert Park, a professor of physics at the University of Maryland, has written "What's New," a short weekly update on science issues for the American Physical Society. Park's quirky, pithy bulletins end with the phrase, "Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the APS, but they should be." Now he has written at length on some of the topics his column has touched on. His opinions may not be yours, but once you read _Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud_, they should be. For Park has taken what ought to be the uncontroversial step of simply insisting that basic science is true, and that those who profit because they can supposedly violate scientific laws are fools or frauds, and the rest of us ought not to be fooled or defrauded. He keeps things basic; he never enters, say, the controversy of creation "science" versus evolution. His realm is physics. For instance, Park spends many pages describing perpetual motion machines. A machine that makes more energy than it takes in (or runs on the same amount of energy it makes) would violate basic thermodynamic laws, which Park carefully and lucidly explains. We may wish for the waterwheel that pumps enough water up to fall over the wheel again and thus keep going forever, but it will never happen. Park covers plenty of other areas: homeopathy, magnet therapy, cold fusion, Star Wars / SDI, human versus robot exploration of space, therapeutic touch, extrasensory perception, alien abductions, Roswell, and so on. In each case, he simply aims cold, hard facts and physical laws at targets that fall under his good sense. "Most people who are drawn to voodoo science simply long for a world in which things are some other way than the way they are." With good humor and clear writing, Park has done us the favor of reminding us that the world is the way it is, that science shows the way it is, and that wishful thinking just won't do.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
80 of 90 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Refreshingly covers new ground, May 28, 2000
Bob Park's excellent book takes up company with recent works in the same vein by Dawkins, Gould, Sagan, Kaminer, and others. It is good reading and entertaining though you may find your blood pressure soaring at times. It seems idiocy knows no bounds. Parks takes a slightly different approach from most of the recent books challenging fringe science and discusses at length how our elected representatives and the U.S. government has been seduced into being advocates of voodoo science. Parks played a role as the information officer for the American Physical Society which has given him an inside view of how this has come about. The book also takes a look at our space program and Parks slices and dices manned missions versus robotic ones. The robotic ones come out on top without much of a struggle. Though I was aware that there was differences of opinion on this matter, I was not aware of the magnitude of the problem and I found this information rather startling and something not covered in any of the other similar books in the field. I don't think Parks is trying to equate manned flight with voodoo science but the discussion of the topic was something I found valuable nonetheless. If you have read the other recent books in this field you may have had a deja vu all over again feeling as they each tended to cover pretty much the same ground. Parks refreshingly expands the playing field and really does provide some new approaches and new information.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
