16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This is THE history of the IWW, despite the problems..., September 12, 2002
Historiographically speaking, this is THE book to read on the history of the IWW. There are other attempts worth reading, (Renshaw or Thompson for example) but for a solidly researched, brilliantly written academic study, this is the place to go. Renshaw's book includes a few things on the IWW oustide North America, and can be thought of as an easy to read summary, but as a historical research and analysis work, it is not in the same league. Thompson's official history of the IWW is a different attempt as well, as its focus is strictly an institutional history; it is not a work of historical research and analysis, it is written in the dry prose of a chronicler's accounts. You won't find in-depth analyses and a major historian's work there, although it has its uses. Given the fact that We Shall Be All was produced more than three decades ago, it still holds much better than a great many number of studies published in its time. In the absence of a new and comprehensive historical work on the history of the IWW, Dubofsky's book is still the major, requisite reading on the subject.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Superb History, August 18, 2008
This is a very well written book, almost 500 pages of judicious treatment of the IWW. The author traces the wobblies' very shaky evolution from 1905 to their ultimate decline into oblivion after World War I. Dubofsky is clearly far from unsympathetic to the wobblies but he portrays them with objectivity. It appears from his analysis that the wobblies suffered many times from a fervent devotion to principle at the expense of clear headed analyses of the real-life situations they faced and were full of optimism about their organization's future that was totally unwarranted.
The wobblies had to figure out how to organize deeply impoverished workers, who were divided by race, language, ethnicity, etc. and who had little funds to support the wobblies. They were opposed by almost the entire Socialist Party, which argued that the only proper course for socialists in the labor movement was to try to "bore from within" A.F of L unions and try to elect socialists to political office. Of course, the AF of L itself was violently hostile, offering support to state and employer repression of the wobblies. The A.F of L was filled mostly with white, relatively well paid English speaking craft workers, who tended to disdain the eastern and southern European immigrants, African Americans, migratory lumber workers and others that the IWW targeted for organization. In its early years the organization could barely keep from collapsing as innumerable left wing elements tried to hijack the organization for their own purposes. The Western Federation of Miners(WFM), originally the leading component of the IWW, soon decided that it wished to eschew a radical anti-capitalist course and adopt AF of L style business unionism. The WFM would soon leave the IWW.
But of course, the biggest component hindering IWW operations was state repression. Because the wobblies preached revolution and sabotage, even if, as the author points out, they were non-violent in practice, state authorities had little compunction in arresting wobbly activists on trumped up charges. The large majority of employers still objected to even the moderate unionism of the A.F of L, so they were especially paranoid about a militant union like the wobblies. Wobblies were placed in horrible conditions in jails during the Free Speech fights on the west coast in 1909-1913. They were deprived of adequate food and water, stuffed together in tiny cells, had a fire hose turned on them at full blast for a half hour in their cells, etc. In San Diego wobblies were kidnapped by vigilantes and taken to a deserted place where they were tortured by being beaten while running through gauntlets of vigilantes. Dubofsky quotes California state investigator Harris Weinstock who compared the treatment of the wobblies to the pogroms against Jews in Czarist Russia. In Lawrence Massachusetts, the Mesabi Range in Minnesota and Everett WA, wobblies were arrested on spurious charges of murder but later found not guilty. In Utah, wobbly member Joe Hill was executed for murder even though the murder gun and bullets could not be tied to him. The prosecution convicted Hill mainly by stressing to the jury that he was a member of a subversive organization that preached against capitalism, religion, patriotism, and other sacred things. In Everett WA, in a prelude to the "Everett Massacre" wobblies were taken from the town's jail by vigilantes to a local park where they were stripped naked and forced to run gauntlets of vigilantes who beat them with very hard and sharp objects.
In spite of all these hindrances, a great many industrial workers were ready to join an organization revolting against terrible working and living conditions. Dubofsky notes that among textile workers in Lawrence MA, the infant mortality rate was 172 per 1000 and for the state's textile workforce, respiratory illnesses were fatal 70 percent of the time compared to only 4 percent among Massachusetts's farmers. Meanwhile, in the Mesabi Range in Minnesota, 600 miners suffered serious injuries from 1910 to 1913 while 160 died on the job.
Dubofsky points out that it was labor shortages caused by World War I that allowed the wobblies to have their greatest successes. Of course it was the war that also began the organization's demise. Wobbly strikes in such vital war industries as lumber and copper mining convinced the federal government, to the delight of businessmen everywhere, to repress the wobblies. The organization's leadership was decimated by imprisonment and most of the organization's records were seized by federal authorities and later destroyed. The wobblies were convicted by the government based on their anti-capitalist political opinions, Dubofsky shows. Meanwhile vigilantes lynched wobbly organizer Frank Little in Montana in 1917 and vigilantes in Bisbee Arizona, supported by copper companies and local authorities, forcibly took IWW copper workers from their homes, placed them in cattle cars and deported them into the New Mexico desert. Local authorities tended to act in more crude ways that the federal government, as Dubofsky shows by the example of IWW sympathizer Theodora Pollok. Pollok was forced by Sacramento police to receive a thorough medical exam of the type given to prostitutes, though, of course, she wasn't a prostitute. The Wilson administration vigorously protested Pollok's treatment, for she was from a well connected upper class Maryland family.
Dubofsky does a good job portraying the last years of the IWW as a remotely viable organization, including the episode of the vigilante terror meted out to the organization's Marine Transport Workers Industrial Union. He also discusses the crushing of IWW organizing efforts during the 1927 labor unrest in the Colorado mining industry. (My review refers to the unabridged 1988 edition of the book--the abridged edition may have left out details of the 1920's IWW and other topics that the unabridged editions cover).
This book brings up some fascinating topics relevant for advocates of militant left wing unionism. Such topics include the inability of the wobblies, as they struggled to gain short term bread and butter benefits for their members, to develop a lasting revolutionary culture among the bulk of its members. Another topic and particularly of interest to me is Dubofsky's discussion as to how ideas regarding centralized control versus more autonomous rank and file direction of strike activities played out within the organization.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not the classic it's presented as..., September 5, 2001
This book caused a major stir when first released in the 60s. But labor history studies have changed a great deal since that time. The entire orientation of this book is patronizing to the amazing works of the IWW.
For example:
1) It completely ignores the IWW's international aspects, for example that the IWW had more influence in Chile and Australia than in the US and Canada.
2) It glosses over the IWWs activities during the 1920s, the Marine Transport Workers' control of the Wetsern Hemisphere's shipping, longshore workers in North America, the 1927 Colorado Miners' Strike, etc. etc.
3) It has no coherent understanding of why the IWW declined. How FDR worked with Lewis and the CIO to force unionization, the principled stands the IWW took to stop the rise of business unionism, and some buttheadedess by the IWW's membership.
It contains many good stories and is an OK overview. The definitive work is still waiting on the subject.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No