5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
It's All About Taiwan!, December 21, 2007
This review is from: A War Like No Other: The Truth About China's Challenge to America (Hardcover)
America's reaction to Tiananmen Square, quick victory in the first Persian Gulf War, and Taiwan have changed China from modest growth in military spending to accelerated military modernization and buildup. Its acquisitions (long-range missiles, aerial refueling capabilities, advanced destroyers and submarines - mostly acquired from Russia) cannot be explained simply as preparations for possible war against Taiwan, a mere 100 miles offshore. In addition, when "push comes to shove," China believes we are more interested in Los Angeles than Taiwan. Meanwhile, the FBI believes China has set up over 3,000 "front" companies to acquire military or industrial technology illegally from the U.S.
On the other hand, China has also achieved some very positive steps - fostering economic growth and a very successful anti-poverty program, reduced oppression of its people, and cessation of fomenting Communist takeovers among its neighbors.
The authors list a number of possible causes of war between the U.S. and China, and heavily discount them all - except for the issue of Taiwan. Not only is this a very serious "face" issue for the Chinese government, it has also become one for the U.S. as well.
Bottom Line: "A War Like No Other" is a reasonably good book; however, I greatly prefer "China: Fragile Superpower" by Susan Shirk for its broader perspective.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The thin red line in the Taiwan Strait, November 29, 2008
This review is from: A War Like No Other: The Truth About China's Challenge to America (Hardcover)
The thin red line in the Taiwan Strait
War involving Taiwan, China and the US is improbable, but even a small likelihood that it could happen should be enough to keep us awake at night
If the world is to see its first hot war between two nuclear superpowers in the 21st century, its principal cause will likely be a small democracy of 23 million people. Or so argue Richard Bush and Michael O'Hanlon in their timely A War Like No Other.
Bush, a former director at the American Institute in Taiwan and current director of the Center for Northeast Asian Studies at the Brookings Institution in Washington, and O'Hanlon, a senior military analyst at Brookings, use their considerable knowledge in the fields of diplomacy and defense to show how the longstanding political dispute between Taipei and Beijing over Taiwan's sovereignty could escalate to devastating effect and why world leaders should do everything in their power to avoid this contingency from becoming reality.
In commandingly clear prose and avoiding overly technical terminology, the authors explain why the decades-old US policy of mutual deterrence against Beijing's hard-line "one China" stance and Taipei's desire for sovereignty has worked and why future US administrations should continue to abide by this guiding principle. By opposing unilateral moves by Taipei to break the status quo -- such as the declaration of a Taiwan Republic -- while providing assurances, as stipulated in the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), that the US would help Taiwan defend itself against an unprovoked Chinese military attack, Washington's strategy has been to create space and buy time so that leaders on both sides of the Strait can resolve the conflict peacefully.
Published one year before the election of Ma Ying-jeou to the presidency and the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) victory in the legislative elections, one can nevertheless imagine the author's sigh of relief at Ma's election and his peace initiative, which would seem to confirm the wisdom of Washington's longstanding policies on the Taiwan Strait. In this vein, the authors also make no effort to conceal their assessment of the administration of former president Chen Shui-bian as having been "provocative," "unreasonable" and taking unnecessary risks. Still, Bush and O'Hanlon helpfully point out that Beijing, having no substantial experience of democracy, is bound to misinterpret political developments in Taiwan, which could precipitate conflict. As such, one conflict-preventing measure the authors propose is for Washington to ensure that Beijing is able to "distinguish actions that the island's politicians take for political gain and those that reflect policy intentions" as well as to impress upon the Chinese that Taiwanese are not necessarily opposed to all forms of unification.
Another important point the authors make is that the leadership in Taipei tends to assume rationality in Beijing regarding the Taiwan question, which could prompt the former to act "recklessly" -- codeword for a move toward independence. Either as the result of misinterpreted signals or actual "provocation" by Taipei, China could feel compelled to abandon diplomacy and apply military pressure on Taiwan. Such action would involve a variety of scenarios, from a naval blockade to limited missile strikes to amphibious invasion, used separately, incrementally, or in combination.
Despite the authors' assertion that war in the Taiwan Strait remains unlikely given what the participants stand to lose in terms of economic loss and casualties, there is a small chance that the Chinese leadership could think that war against Taiwan -- or even against the US -- is winnable, which could make conflict likelier.
Regarding Taiwan's or the US' ability to counter a Chinese attack, Bush and O'Hanlon are optimists, concluding that with the People's Liberation Army (PLA) lacking three critical determinants for a successful amphibious assault -- air superiority, initial troop/firepower superiority at point of attack, and reinforcement advantage at point of attack -- added to hardened targets throughout Taiwan, an invasion would be prohibitively costly, if not impossible. Other analysts, including William S. Murray, an associate professor at the US Naval War College, are less optimistic and counter that the optimistic view, including the one O'Hanlon has held for years, fails to take into account the leaps made by the PLA in terms of modernization and accuracy.
Regardless of whether one sides with O'Hanlon or Murray on this issue -- and admittedly Bush and O'Hanlon's position appears to be slightly overoptimistic -- the likeliest scenario of a Chinese attack remains the blockade, which Taiwan's growing economic dependence on China has turned into a tempting, and possibly quite effective, weapon. As the TRA refers to such a contingency as a "threat to peace and security of the Western Pacific and of grave concern to the United States," an economic embargo against Taiwan would likely prompt a response from the US military, which could be required to ensure safe passage for Taiwanese and international ships entering the Taiwan Strait.
Once the PLA and the US military are brought within proximity to each other, with a third party -- Taiwan -- beyond the control of both but capable of inflaming the situation, the likelihood of escalation becomes dangerously real, the authors argue. Errors could be committed that, unlike the peacetime mid-air collision between an EP-3 naval reconnaissance plane and a Chinese fighter in 2001, could easily spin out of control in a war scenario. With Beijing perhaps working under the assumption that Washington would be unprepared to suffer mass casualties to defend Taiwan (the so-called "imbalance of fervor"), the PLA could target a few US Navy ships, or an aircraft carrier and hope that a few thousand US casualties would be enough to deter further US action. Bush and O'Hanlon, however, argue that rather than break Washington's will, such a "limited" option would spark retaliation and widen the war to China's shores -- including preventive conventional military strikes against Chinese nuclear installations. In return, fearing that its nuclear arsenal would be obliterated before it could use it, China could feel impelled to turn to the nuclear option, perhaps in the form of a high-altitude nuclear detonation to create an electromagnetic pulse, or nuclear strikes against naval ports in Taiwan or Okinawa, Japan, or US carrier fleets operating in the Strait..
With such imponderables, Bush and O'Hanlon contend, if perhaps alarmingly, that war in the Taiwan Strait could "create the most serious nuclear risk since the Cuban Missile Crisis." It is, therefore, in everybody's advantage to prevent the cold war in the Strait from turning into a hot one, and to this end, leaders in Taipei, Beijing and Washington would benefit tremendously from heeding the warnings and prescriptions provided by the authors in this highly relevant book, and, for those in Taiwan, to overlook the authors' creeping bias against the Taiwanese independence movement.
(Originally published in the Taipei Times, Nov. 30, 2008, p. 14.)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
