Most Helpful Customer Reviews
140 of 166 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Poor scholarship, April 6, 2005
This review is from: Warriors of God: Richard the Lionheart and Saladin in the Third Crusade (Paperback)
Reston's work serves as a perfect example of poor scholarship. The fact that this work was not intended by the author to be a scholarly study does not excuse its lack of historical basis. As other reviewers have written, Reston attributes thoughts and motivations to his "characters" without any shred of historical evidence. In effect, much of this work is nothing more than historical fiction. It almost appears as if Reston quickly read over the primary sources along witha few secondary sources and simply filled in the blanks with his own ideas. Also, as in keeping with the worst of modern popular history, Reston simplifies the 3rd Crusade by portraying all Western European Crusaders as barbaric, evil, greedy, and intolerant while Saladin and other Muslims are civilized, goodhearted, generous, and tolerant. Such distinctions sometimes make for good sales in a politcally-correct market, but they don't do anything to advance any type of historical learning amongst the public. One of Reston's most unforgivable errors is his treatment of Richard the Lionheart's sexuality. Numerous times, he libels Richard (and Philip Augustus) by calling him a homosexual. The FACT is that there is ZERO historical evidence for this claim, and no serious historian believes it. The charge is based on one line referring to Richard and Philip sharing a bed together -- a common medieval metaphor used to describe the closeness of a political bond not personal sexual relations.
This work will give the reader a decent general history of the 3rd Crusade, but those not familiar with the era may have a difficult time separating Reston's facts from his fictions. I advise readers to go in a different direction. Unfortunately, a good work on the 3rd Crusade alone surprisingly doesn't exist. Geoffrey Regan's "Lionhearts", while not perfect, is a superior work to Reston's. "Lionhearts" is a dual biography of both Richard and Saladin and covers the 3rd Crusade in the last half of the book. John Gillingham, arguably the world's foremost Richard I scholar, has written a great biography, "Richard I". The 3rd Crusade is covered well in the book. Most general histories of the crusades cover the 3rd Crusade more accurately than Reston. See works by Payne, Madden, Riley-Smith, etc. One warning: An earlier reviewer stated that Runciman's 3-volume History of the Crusades is an unbiased source that lets the reader decide for himself. While Runciman's work is indeed very valuable (I like it for a number of reasons), it's certainly not unbiased. Runciman has a clear pro-Byzantine bias and openly criticizes the motivations and actions of the Crusaders. In fact, he calls the Crusades "a long line of intolerance" and "a sin agaist the Holy Ghost" -- hardly the statements of a historian that leaves moral conclusions to the reader.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
32 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
An absorbing, puzzling read...., August 3, 2002
This review is from: Warriors of God: Richard the Lionheart and Saladin in the Third Crusade (Paperback)
Mr. Reston has produced an entertaining book about the Third Crusade. Indeed, I stopped all other activities in my busy schedule to finish the book. Until I read this book, I had encountered very little about the Crusades. Last year I read Karen Armstrong's "Islam," in which a few paragraphs address the subject. So, to this point, most of my knowledge comes from "Warriors of God." There were a few things that struck me as odd about the book. First, no footnotes. The book is full of odd and marvelous stories, and I wanted to look up their sources. However, without the footnotes I could not do that. Reston does provide a list of primary and secondary sources, but it's unfortunate that he didn't give us more detail in footnotes. Second, I was struck by his sympathies with the Muslims and relative disdain for the Christians. I have no idea if his judgments are accurate or not, but I did find it odd that his description of Saladin was so deferential. This may be my westerner's view of things getting in the way, but it's what I experienced when reading the book. Finally, I couldn't tell what was true and what was not. Periodically Reston would judiciously point out that a certain scribe might be inflating figures or portraying his master in too favorable a light. But then Reston doesn't use the same critical thinking, for example, about the blood flowing in the streets of Jerusalem during the First Crusade. It seemed to me that it would have helped if Reston had supported that bit of lore with a not pointing out how it could be true -- by some calculations in geometry -- that the Crusaders were literally wading in the blood of their victims. Despite my puzzlement, I heartily recommend Mr. Reston's book. It brings the Third Crusade to life, the way a good novel would, but it still retains authority as a historical account of the events of that time.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
53 of 64 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
If you are looking for a great book you can't put down...., May 21, 2001
This is it. Reston has taken an important piece of history and its main characters, Richard the Lionheart and Saladin, and brought them to life. With clarity and detail, we are taken into 12th Century Middle East and European politics surrounding Jerusalem. At the same time we also learn new facts exposing a critical component of the conflicts gripping the same region today. The Third Crusade was sparked by the actions of Chatillon, Price of Kerak, a European stronghold in the Middle East. Despite a peace treaty, Chatillon attacked a camel train belonging to Saladin. When the European King of Jerusalem demand Chatillon make restitution, Chatillon replied: "Just as he is the lord of his land, I am the lord of my land. I have no truce with the Arabs." As Reston writes, "Chatillon's treachery had elevated Saladin prestige throughout his empire and made his cause righteous...A chain reaction began." Change a few words and this could be written about the conflict in the Middle East during the last year. From this starting point the book just gets better with an understanding that only an experienced historian can develop and a storytelling that only a gifted writer can produce. Reston has proved himself both. This is a worthy companion to his earlier books, Galileo, A Life and The Last Apocalypse.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|