Customer Reviews

Water Life (3pc) [Blu-ray]

5 star:		(6)
4 star:		(6)
3 star:		(2)
2 star:		(4)
1 star:		(3)

 

 

I was excited for the "Water Life" release, as there are few long format documentary series focusing primarily on aquatic cinematography available on Blu Ray, with the exception of some single titles (Discover, Planet Earth, NatGeo). That being said, the production, though commendable and ambitious, does not live up to the grandeur of the BBC produced nature docs, which I would consider the standard. They do however use them as a model, excluding any footage of scientists in the field, talking heads, animation, etc, which I find to be a unwelcomed fluff in most Discovery Channel and Natgeo wildlife products. The series is produced by CIN-TV (Caribbean International Networks) and co-sponsored by a range of conservation organizations, so the message tends to lean strongly towards environmental responsibility and protection more so than biological behavior or analysis.

A great deal of the footage of wildlife is shot in (sometimes extreme) close-up. Some of this aforementioned imagery is gorgeous and unique, and offers a visual treat in HD. Shots of fish eyes, scales, amphibian skin, birds, etc, provide a certain amount of intimacy not often found in larger more sweeping surveys of nature on film. It also allows the cinematography and editing to be a bit more abstract and creative by not limiting to perfectly framed shots and allowing sequences to play-out with more of a montage feel. In my opinion there are bit too many time remapped shots however (specifically vistas and flowing water), which are not my favorite when used for any reason other than to convey purposeful time-lapse rather than for aesthetics reasons.

The narration is a bit uneven, and at times, strangely paced, without the cohesive editorial structure that BBC is so good at. My guess is that it has been translated to English for this package, as the series most likely was originally produced in Spanish (though this is only speculation based on the CIN-TV and almost strictly Latin American credits). This would account for narration lines that seem to repeat verbatim back to back at times, and descriptions and analysis that, though correct, are a bit off in word choice. It should be noted that, very much to the discredit of the distributors (Questar) there are no subtitles. This is a major packaging flaw, especially for a documentary, and one which could potentially be useful as an educational tool. In my opinion, not including subtitles in a global documentary series is unacceptable and does a huge disservice to the directors and producers. The blu-ray discs are mastered at 1080i, which can be noticeable at times, and there is some distracting banding on random deep ocean shots, where color mastering and compression are at fault, but overall the image quality is very clean and colors crisp and accurate.

Overall, this product is well worth viewing at the Amazon price, though I could not recommend it at the suggested retail price. As a wildlife documentary buff, I tend to be hyper-critical of the production values and intentions of a film. I appreciate that this series exists at all, as the use of HD to actually create a planned purposeful program rather than to display pretty images is sorely lacking in the market. Though the series does, understandably fail to reach the levels of productions from larger companies, I believe it has maximized its resources and potential to deliver something commendable. This was not thrown together with found footage, gimmicky editing, and the lack of direction that plagues American television documentary titles. Surely CIN-TV did not have the $10 million used to make BBC's "Blue Planet" or the $25 Million allowed for "Planet Earth," yet their enthusiasm for the series and professional approach to the content is evident.

This is a very disappointing production. As other reviewers have said, it definitely is far below the quality of recent BBC productions. In fact, very far below those lofty standards. If you collect the several criticisms that have been posted on this, they are all correct. First, unless you know very little about natural history, you will learn nothing from these programs. I would not say the the narrative is error-prone, as in the narrative in some PBS Nature productions, it is just simple-minded and hard to listen to for any length of time. In one episode, on fresh water, you will flip from shots of tropical animals to a temperate stream, with no apparent reason. This is typical- you will be flipped from clip to clip in a sequence that may have been random! Much of the source material was very low quality, but most of it was very good, in fact. It is what the film editors did with these clips that boggles the viewers. Invariably, time motion is jerky and interrupted, so that, in panning landscape shots in particular, there is no smooth motion at all. At first I thought that this was related to digital artifacts (and there are many of those), but no, this was intentional. If you see a good clip (and there are many), you will have only about one second at most to watch it, before you are flashed to something else. Whoever put this together may have had a background in "creative video editing," but clearly no evident appreciation for the thoughtful observation of nature by a viewer. One would think that the theme of water movement and its impact on various ecosystems could be the basis of a meaningful production, but this one is very hard for me to watch. Maybe other people process visual information differently than I do! Anyway, for awesome productions see BBC productions on the Galapagos, Planet Earth, and most of the Yellowstone production. I really enjoy watching those, as much as I find this water series difficult to enjoy. Good natural history video? It starts with outstanding cinematography, but also requires excellent research and thematic focus on scripts, and careful film editing to preserve the special art of this medium. Rent before you buy this one!

Well if you swooned over Planet Earth and were eager like me to elongate the love affair with new material, you're going to SORELY disappointed with Water Life. Senator, I know Planet Earth. Planet Earth was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Planet Earth... Which is to say that while the visuals are terrific and look great in HD on the big screen, the script is dreadfully shallow. The Voice-over guy sounds like someone you'd hear when you're put on hold ("Your call is very important to us. Please stay on the line...") so he got grating mighty quickly. And the script is the pits. While you're seeing great footage the audio track simply doesnt support what you are seeing. What kind of fish are those? And where the heck are we? We get it- it's all about water but throw us a bone and tell us more than just these charming phrases. I see clusters of eggs. Anyone know what kind of eggs they are? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? My kids aged 10 and 13 got bored rather quickly and actually made a game of counting how many times the guy said the word water. You'll note that the packaging looks mighty similar to our beloved Planet Earth but "Water Life" is in a word- shallow. So see it if want but for heaven's sake don't listen.

Having watched a few *GREAT* Nature productions from BBC - Planet Earth, Yellowstone, Galapagos, etc..
I was very disappointed with Water Life production.

GOODS - This Water Life productions have some good clips of wildlife not seeing anywhere. These are few in between, but if they got the shots, then it looks EXCELLENT. I think perhaps it's just from one very highly experienced cinematographer from the group. It's on par with BBC shots. I have been doing photography for 20+ years so I do know some rules of the trades. The narration was OK to me but at times seemed stretched out to cover 3 discs. That's about all the goods stuffs that I noticed after watching the Water Life series.

BADS - Where to begin? - These particular shots must come from a VERY INEXPERIENCED or porn director/cinematographer. Aerophotography clips are mostly shot from behind helicopter view - pulling away from the source landscape or mountain tops. This causes a dizzying headache, especially when they add speed/fast forward. Time Lapse photography shot of sceneries that they also PAN at the same time adds to ridiculous headache. I have never seen BBC PAN a Time Lapse shots for obvious reason. The good thing I can say about some of these clips is that it's short. Otherwise people would quit watching after a few minutes. Then there are LOTS of scenes/clips at close-ups of just different animal's feet/legs walking or running around - what the HELL is the point??? Also, I seemed to notice this trend in almost all shots with animals in a scenery - the animal(s) just walks or runs out/off the picture frame completely. You are left with looking at nothing. Then, they finally cut away. This brings up the next problem - they cut away to completely different scenes a lot of times - this makes it very choppy & confused as to what's going on (ex: birds to plants to snow to trees). There's NO rule of 3rd in photography whatsoever. A lot of the time the rule of 3rd applies to the butt of the animals - then as you would have guessed, the animal walks completely off the picture frame. A lot of the shots are just pictures of animal's butts right into the lens! If I have to take a guess, one of these cinematographers is from the PORN industry (full animal copulations, feet/legs fetishes, butt shots of animals...etc). Lastly, this is supposed to be HD quality, yet, there are plenty of Out of Focus clips that I can't tell what it is because it's sooo close-up. Then there are the outer space clips from the 70's that they put in. What? NASA does not have updated HD clips of outer space??? Even Google Map looks better.

Well, this was my entry in the $20 arena for complete set of Nature Documentary. For the price, you can't ask for more. At least I didn't pay $25 for just 1 episode/disc at BB.
Stick with BBC Nature series, as they have the EXPERIENCED TEAM with many decades of work to put together a show for you to watch/enjoy. I would definitely pay more for the BBC series.

Water Life is a very good documentary and probably the best I've seen in a long time that wasn't produced by the BBC. Visually, this documentary is stunning (especially in blu-ray). It covers aquatic environments on land and in water, showcasing the diversity and range of ecosystems.

This isn't simply another version of Blue Planet: Seas of Life. In fact, Water Life features relatively few of the large, charismatic aquatic animals such as whales and sharks (although they are in the documentary). Rather, this series spends a good deal of time with the smaller creatures. It does this well, with great closeups of insects and baby fish. Many of these animals, while not new to science, are certainly new to TV viewers. In fact, it's almost more like Microcosmos in that sense.

Unfortunately, the narrator doesn't match the quality of the footage. The narrator's voice is extremely dry, almost robotic. While the images show awesome scenes of water ripping through valleys, the narrator comes across as pedantic in tone. It's too bad David Attenborough couldn't narrate it. Perhaps the narration could be remixed for a new version of Water Life.

The visuals on this documentary are beautiful, exceedingly so, and this is both a plus and a minus. I got the feeling at times that the editors were torn between making an educational documentary and a beautiful set of moving images.
Maybe I'm being unfair, but this pales in comparison to the BBC documentaries like Planet Earth. I was particularly disappointed with the commentary for the most part as it seemed halting and poorly strung together.
Having said that however I like the fact that the series is based on half hour segments and it is indeed a spectacular visual treat.

nice stuff, a great addition to planet earth and now life, it doesnt have the rad panning out like planet earth, where it seems like ur viewing from space and then zooming back into a single bird, but..... it does have alot of animals, which was missing fromplanet earth, hence the new life series. worth the money i think.....

No it's not like Planet Earth, it's different. It's a visual feast. Close-ups of animals are amazing, it's like being inches away. Well worth the price.

This set is very interesting and well done. It is not Planet Earth material but it is priced accordingly. It is depicted in "Video codec: MPEG-4 AVC Video resolution: 1080i Aspect ratio: 1.78:1" as per [...]. Audio is: Dolby Digital 2.0.

I was not expecting to be as "PLANET EARTH" so I am very pleased.

The photography in this documentary is outstanding. Blue ray and HD were made for features like this. I was a little disappointed however with the narration. The level of writing was not as good as the photography and at time seemed a little monotonous. That spoiled the series a bit for me somewhat.