1.0 out of 5 stars
Typical Liberal Screed, November 18, 2011
This review is from: We Dissent: Talking Back to the Rehnquist Court, Eight Cases That Subverted Civil Liberties and Civil Rights (Hardcover)
Anti-american "professor" Ayers attacks the Rehnquist court, not on rational grounds, but on the author's complete lack of understanding of our constitution and its roots in western culture. From the sensational (and inaccurate) subtitle to the table of contents, a worthless attempt at academic discourse revealing nothing more than his own socialist predispositions. Unless you already subscribe to his bankrupt ideology or are coerced, perhaps as a student of his, to pay dearly for his predictably biased and unresearched "work" don't bother with his worthless books. This book only serves as a shining example of everything that's wrong with academia. But for that, we thank you.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A thought-provoking and stirring call-to-arms, February 5, 2010
This review is from: We Dissent: Talking Back to the Rehnquist Court, Eight Cases That Subverted Civil Liberties and Civil Rights (Hardcover)
The previous reviewers have mentioned how invaluable and accessible "We Dissent" will be for high school and college students interested in law and politics, and I certainly agree. I would add that this collection is also particularly interesting and compelling for law students, and practicing attorneys like myself. When I was in law school, rigorous and critical intellectual examination of the positions taken by jurists was often woefully--and surprisingly--lacking in many of my law school courses. Too often, the pressure put on professors and law students alike to review and digest massive amounts of legal material, with the goal of being able to memorize and recite legal holdings during a final examination, came at the expense of critical examination or questioning of the law being studied. When I was in high school, I had a history teacher who frequently supplemented textbook materials with excerpts of incisive analysis from both the left and the right. As a law student, I would have loved to have had "We Dissent" similarly assigned as material to complement the rulings we were reading in our textbooks. To all current law students, if your con law professor does not assign "We Dissent," I promise that it is well worth your time (other reading assignments be damned!) to read it yourself on the side. In addition, I think current practicing civil rights litigators will find that "We Dissent" is a thought-provoking and stirring call-to-arms for our continuing fight for justice. Definitely a recommended read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Should be required reading., January 11, 2010
This review is from: We Dissent: Talking Back to the Rehnquist Court, Eight Cases That Subverted Civil Liberties and Civil Rights (Hardcover)
This is an absolutely fascinating piece. A great portion of my research interests involve matters of civil rights and liberties, so I was quite thrilled to receive it.
The premise of the book and the central question posed to each of the book's contributors is novel: If you were a Supreme Court Justice on a case that defied our constitution and undermined our civil rights, how would your dissent read?
The authors of each chapter do not disappoint us. Each one addresses a specific Rehnquist Court decision that eroded the rights to which the Constitution entitles us. The arguments are forceful and clear: not a word too many, not a page too long, and not an ounce of jargon. While law and politics are central to my studies, I am not a lawyer and I did not attend law school. Still, the essays are unbelievably accessible, and they must be--these laws and decisions should be well understood and discussed by all of us who are governed by them.
The piece starts off with a thorough introduction that provides background about the Court, the cases, and a bit about the contributing authors. It is quick and to the point while still giving the reader a solid sense of what the purpose of the book is and how each case stands to affect our lives. Essentially, the introduction helps us to understand why these laws, debates, and ideas matter.
Then come the dissents. I won't go into each of them because my praise would grow long and saccharine, but the first chapter starts the book off with a bang. Written by constitutional law expert, author, lawyer, professor, and now Dean of UC Irvine School of Law, Erwin Chemerinsky plunges the reader into a driving argument cutting straight to the premise of democracy: are we all equal? (Yes: in classic Chemerinsky style, he dissents from a 1999 decision for *three* main reasons). My heart raced as I closed in on his final paragraph, and I literally wanted to stand up and clap after I finished his last words: "I dissent." Over and over, I was overcome by the earnestness and passion of the authors in this volume, and while I frequently felt enraged about the decisions they addressed, I felt simultaneously heartened. I was holding in my hands the work of good people dedicating their lives to "doing justice."
Each chapter is a thrill, filled with philosophical insights, historical notes dating back to our Constitutional Convention, and most importantly, compelling reasons why decisions on the books must be overturned. These are decisions that replaced the principles of good government with expedience, and condone everything from racism to torture to unlawful search and seizure. I would recommend this as assigned reading in high school AP Government classes, and to college teachers of Law and Society courses; indeed, I plan to recommend the book to professors at my institution. The piece is already pretty affordable, but now that it is available on the Kindle, this one should be in the collection of everyone interested in learning more about what went wrong during the Rehnquist Reign--and how exactly to make things right going forward.
Five stars.
Míchel Angela Martinez
Ph.D. student, University of Southern California
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
