The Wealth of Nations : Books 1-3 : Complete And Unabridged [Paperback]

Adam Smith (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: April 27, 2009

The Wealth of Nations : Books 1 - 3 written by legendary author Adam Smith is widely considered to be one of the top 100 greatest books of all time. This great classic will surely attract a whole new generation of readers. For many, The Wealth of Nations: Books 1 - 3 is required reading for various courses and curriculums. And for others who simply enjoy reading timeless pieces of classic literature, this gem by Adam Smith is highly recommended. Published by Classic House Books and beautifully produced, The Wealth of Nations: Books 1 -3 would make an ideal gift and it should be a part of everyone's personal library.

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Adam Smith (1723-90) taught both logic and moral philosophy at Glasgow University. His Wealth of Nations revolutionised the economic theories of the time. Andrew Skinner teaches at the Adam Smith Institute and is an expert on the author's work. --This text refers to an alternate Paperback edition.

Product Details

• Paperback: 312 pages
• Publisher: CreateSpace; Unabridged edition (April 27, 2009)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 144214792X
• ISBN-13: 978-1442147928
• Product Dimensions: 8.4 x 5.5 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 15.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #389,774 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Economics at the Beginning of the Agricultural/Industrial Revolution, January 21, 2012

By 

Loyd E. Eskildson "Pragmatist" (Phoenix, AZ.) - See all my reviews
(HALL OF FAME REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The Wealth of Nations : Books 1-3 : Complete And Unabridged (Paperback)

Smith's 'The Wealth of Nations' (1776) is a foundation work for classical economics (Smith, Ricardo, Malthus, Mill), contending that free markets are more productive and beneficial, and can regulate themselves. At the time, medieval feudalism was giving way to major changes brought first by the agricultural revolution (individual field ownership - replacing common fields, early mechanization, introduction of the iron plow, crop rotation, and selective breeding). One of Smith's biggest changes was shifting from a focus on the king's/lord's treasury to the national income of all citizens, be they laborers, landlords, or factory owners.

Smith saw division of labor, more in industry than agriculture, as bringing the greatest increase in output of all factors. 'Water-carriage' extends markets and the opportunities for division of labor to areas near waterways. Division of labor also greatly reduces one's ability to be self-sufficient, and increases the need for money.

Smith envisioned the natural value of commodities as that of the embedded labor. Incorporating scarcity/supply vs. demand (including that created by secret processes) then leads to market price. Combinations among workers (unions) or employers would circumvent natural price determination. Interest rate determination follows a similar supply-demand process.

Smith was also one of the first to note the tendency of aligned individuals to use collective influence to manipulate government (eg. subsidies), or more simply, to conspire to raise prices.

Continuing, Smith was anti-protectionism (pro Free Trade - an obvious outgrowth of his support for division of labor) and believed that an 'invisible hand' guides individuals to generally promote the public interest more than intended.

Smith supported taxation in proportion to respective ability - eg. progressive taxation, as well as limiting government involvement to preventing society from falling apart. Continuing - "The man whose whole life is spent in performing a few simple operations . . . generally becomes as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human creature to become" - hardly an endorsement for democracy.

Smith also envisioned that government borrowing increased the likelihood of waging war and spending money on schemes to win citizen favor. He suspected that opposing large international corporations allowed production of greater value.

Bottom-Line: Adam Smith was clearly a great early political-economic thinker.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Decent Edition, Grand Ideas, January 3, 2012

By 

JSmalls - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Wealth of Nations : Books 1-3 : Complete And Unabridged (Paperback)

I appreciated this edition of the classic work of economics because it is precisely the first three books that I found most relevant to my understanding of Smith's theories. A more complete version might be suitable to some, but I found this more than met my purposes for a general introduction.

10 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars The violent distortion of Adam Smith's great ideas, October 20, 2009

By 

Stephen Eadon (Brighton UK) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Wealth of Nations : Books 1-3 : Complete And Unabridged (Paperback)

The complete, unabridged penguin edition of this book is around 900 pages long and is divided into 2 volumes. The first volume is divided into books I, II and III, the second into books IV and V. These two last books comprise more than half of the bulk of the whole work, more than 500 pages. They also contain the aspects of Economics in which Smith believed personal interests must be balanced by social responsibility. Describing this edition as unabridged is insulting and disingenuous.

Adam Smith is a thinker of the first order. But he was writing in the second half of the eighteenth century. This must always be kept in mind, as the values he held may find themselves appropriated in ways he then did not understand, and if alive today may have disagreed with. He was a moral philosopher before he was an economist, and his works in both fields can only be fully understood in light of one another.