|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Review
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Lowith's Argument Remains Important,
By A Customer
This review is from: Max Weber and Karl Marx (Routledge Classics in Sociology) (Paperback)
Lowith's 1932 essay on Marx and Weber remains the definitive statement of the deep commonalities between these two thinkers. That is, it argues that Weber's central concern is to develop a fundamental theory of capitalism, as with Marx. For decades, it was "necessary" to attempt to parry Marx with Weber. Lowith's stood as an accusation of "bad faith" with regard to all such attempts, especially those who would evacuate Weber of all critique, even if only existential. Derek Sayer's "Capitalism and Modernity" is perhaps most in the spirit of this minor masterpiece.
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Max Weber and Karl Marx (Controversies in sociology) by Karl Löwith (Hardcover - July 1982)
Used & New from: $301.36
| |
| ||
