3.0 out of 5 stars
Self-defeating Policies, April 26, 2011
The title of my review not only refers to current U.S. policies on clandestine border crossings and immigration in general, but also to Amazon.com's review guidelines.
My original review, which I should have copied and saved on my desktop, was declared in violation of Amazon's review guidelines. Specifically, I cannot repeat the second word in the title--even in the context of the book's title! (Same thing happened on NPR's website.) I was simply repeating the word as part of the title and in no way was using it derrogatorily to describe clandestine border crossers. But that's not good enough for Moderator Kafka! So when I protested that another favorable review ALSO included the word in question and was still on the website, Amazon goes and deletes that too! The end result is that what is actually a good book which I recommend, now has NO favorable reviews for the shoppers to read! Bad policy.
Peter Laufer's unmentionable (are we in the movie Z or what?) book is a good but flawed book which many times reads like a travel book and unnecessarily stretches from Tijuana, Mexico all the way to Cairo . . . Egypt! In my original review, I was critical of its failings but also recognized its strengths. For example, a sociologist and an economist (David Coffey of the University of Kentucy and James Smith of the RAND Corp.) point out studies they undertook which demolish the Nativist paranoia, but then the author fails to include where to find said studies--and that is crucial. Also included here are quotes from nativist militia types like Arizona's Simcox in all their absurdity and paranoia. The review also served as a rebuttal to the racist, emotional, fact-free, and pathetic "reviews" of Lloyd Eskildson of Phoenix and "US Infidel" of MD. It is often amazing to see the denial and hostility toward fact and the perpetration of falsehoods.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
28 of 59 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Simplistic - Couldn't Disagree More!, December 28, 2005
This review is from: Wetback Nation: The Case for Opening the Mexican-American Border (Hardcover)
Peter Laufer wants to open the Mexican-American border because the U.S. economy "desperately needs the workers" and to stop the deaths incurred crossing the Arizona desert.
Former Governor Lamm, however, hit the nail on the head when he stated that the U.S. cannot absorb all the millions of poor peoples that want in.
America's decades-long laxity in deterring illegal Mexican aliens from entering our nation has created nine serious, and growing problems:
1)Substantial and disproportionate increase in violent and drug-related crimes - at least twice the rate of the general population, according to government statistics.
2)Substantially increased crowding, traffic, pollution, housing costs, and demands on already strained natural resources.
Census estimates show that at least half of U.S. population growth is due to recent immigrants and their very high birth-rates, and that immigrants (mostly Mexican illegals) and their children will account for about a 100 million population increase in the next 50 years, resulting in Hispanics (mostly illegals and their progeny) comprising about 25% of U.S. population.
3)Decreased wages and opportunities for law-abiding Americans, particularly those most vulnerable - the poor.
Examples: Far fewer Americans are now employed in housing than previously, even in relatively skilled areas such as carpentry, tile-setting, heavy machinery operation, etc. Other areas with substantial illegal inroads include manufacturing, transportation, hospitality, and food-service. A recent study by a leading economist in this area concluded that immigration costs U.S. men an average of $1,700/year.
4)Increased opportunity for terrorists to become absorbed within U.S. communities due to their physical similarity to many within the large and increasing numbers of illegal Mexicans, and ease of accompanying them across the U.S. border.
5)Increased government-funded healthcare costs - Hispanics in general are about twice as likely to be uninsured, and illegals undoubtedly much higher; their high rate of reproduction acerbates the topic.
6)Increased education problems and costs due to the large numbers of illegal Mexican alien children and the children of illegals - eg. millions of non-English speaking students and dropout rates about 2.5 that of the rest of the U.S. population. (Mexico's 9 - 10 million indigenous people, about one-tenth of the population and a large proportion of illegals, have the highest rates of illiteracy and disease in the country.)
7)Increased fragmentation of U.S. society due particularly to illegal Mexican aliens' general unwillingness to assimilate - learn English, accept historic American values (eg. families and legitimacy, importance of education), while also pursuing voting rights in Mexico. When combined with American's litigious nature, substantially increased claims of "racism" and divisiveness associated with efforts to increase their share of better jobs, housing, etc. will also be created.
8)An estimated $10- 30 billion in funds annually sent back to Mexico - deflating the American economy and adding to our "trade deficit." In addition, much of what is earned by these workers is not taxed - further adding to America's problems.
9)All of Mexico's most lucrative corporate sectors - oil, finance, media and telecommunications, heavy industry, luxury hotels, transportation - are controlled by a small, clubby, light-skinned market-dominant minority. America's tolerance of illegals fleeing Mexican discrimination only allows it to continue. (Per Amy Chua, author of "World on Fire.")
Bottom Line: The U.S. will degenerate into an overcrowded, poor, crime-ridden, "third-world, low-wage copy of Mexico unless U.S. border enforcement substantially improves. It is true that both Republicans and Democrats have played games with this issue. Nonetheless, illegals are a burden that the U.S. cannot afford.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
19 of 51 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Multicultural garbage, June 20, 2006
This review is from: Wetback Nation: The Case for Opening the Mexican-American Border (Hardcover)
I put this vile book back on the shelf almost as soon as I picked it up. This is typical multicultural liberal garbage, and the author is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the open borders lobby, Wall Street Journal cheap labor profiteers, guilt-ridden brainwashed liberal moonbats, one world government utopians, and the huge fifth column of minority and ethnic agitators who loath the White Christian majority.
I'd like to see the author making his inane case to the HUNDREDS of thousands of victims (and their families) of rape and murder by the hands of illegal aliens. Let HIM pay health care costs of illegals in emergency rooms. Let HIS children sit in "bilingual" classrooms crammed with tens of Hispanic kids who don't know a word of English, who will drop out and join a gang at the age of 15. Let HIS house lose value as a result of illegals invading his neighborhood and sending property values plummeting.
Me, I'd rather pass these "blessings of diversity." Too bad 1 star is the lowest rating, because this garbage doesn't even deserve 1/10 of a star.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No