WHAT BLOOD WON'T TELL and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy New
$16.29
Qty:1
  • List Price: $21.00
  • Save: $4.71 (22%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 10 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

What Blood Won't Tell: A History of Race on Trial in America Paperback – May 31, 2010


See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
$16.29
$12.95 $5.14


Frequently Bought Together

What Blood Won't Tell: A History of Race on Trial in America + The Routledge Companion to Race and Ethnicity (Routledge Companions)
Price for both: $51.48

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Image
Looking for the Audiobook Edition?
Tell us that you'd like this title to be produced as an audiobook, and we'll alert our colleagues at Audible.com. If you are the author or rights holder, let Audible help you produce the audiobook: Learn more at ACX.com.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Harvard University Press (May 31, 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0674047982
  • ISBN-13: 978-0674047983
  • Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.3 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,181,667 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Starred Review. Through a close reading of racial identity trials in America, this book offers an eloquent contribution to ongoing debates over affirmative action, identity politics and the construction of a colorblind society. Historian Gross argues that racial identity trials—court cases in which outcomes turned on determining a person's race and their concomitant rights and privileges—provides an excellent basis for viewing the construction of whiteness and assessing the volatile category of race in American society. The author rigorously examines select cases including the outcomes of suits for freedom by onetime slaves like Abby Guy, who in 1857 convinced an all-white male jury that she was white and thus deserving of freedom. Upsetting the familiar notion of the one-drop rule in determining racial identity, Gross shows that in such cases the notion of what constituted race was itself as much in play as whether a particular individual could be identified (through some unstable combination of expert and common sense opinion) as one race or another. The social performance of identity is key, and enduringly so, as Gross periodically underscores by reference to various modern debates and trends. (Oct.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

From Booklist

Challenging the presumption of many scholars of the dominance of the one-drop rule in conferring black status, Gross argues that despite the rule, in court and by custom, racial boundaries were much more fluid and flexible—yet, primarily in the service of white supremacy. From slavery through the Jim Crow period to the twentieth century free-white phase, Gross focuses on several prominent trials involving racially ambiguous individuals or groups that challenged the one-drop rule and reflected the depth of the racial hierarchy. The drawing of lines between whites and blacks in associating slavery with race pushed middle- and lower-class whites to identify more strongly with white elites. Drawing legal lines between Indians and blacks racialized both groups, undercut any potential alliance, and helped facilitate the loss of Indian lands. For immigrants, the line helped facilitate the identification of America as a white nation, and undercut a potential alliance based on class. Gross also reflects on how this history of race determination fits into current efforts at a color-blind approach that ignores the significance of race in American culture. --Vernon Ford --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

More About the Author

Ariela Gross is the John B. & Alice R. Sharp Professor of Law & History at the University of Southern California, where she teaches legal history, contracts, and race & gender in the law. She has been a visiting professor at Tel Aviv University and the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales in Paris, as well as a Guggenheim Fellow, a Frederick J. Burkhardt Fellow and an NEH Long-term Fellow at the Huntington Library. She lives in Venice, California with her husband and two children, where she practices yoga and does triathlons in her free time. She is working on a comparative study of law, race and slavery in the Americas with historian Alejandro de la Fuente right now.

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 15 people found the following review helpful By A.D. Powell on January 4, 2009
Format: Hardcover
Ariela Gross has performed a great service by writing a book that can be used a reference for anyone (teachers, journalists, etc.) who THINKS they know about racial classification in the U.S. Gross does not do everything well. Frank W. Sweet has written a more comprehensive account of U.S. racial classification trials: Legal History of the Color Line: The Rise And Triumph of the One-drop Rule; Lawrence R. Tenzer has written a better book on the political importance of antebellum white slaves: The Forgotten Cause of the Civil War: A New Look at the Slavery Issue and Virginia Dominguez has written a comprehensive account of racial classification among Louisiana Creoles (a group that Gross neglects)White by Definition: Social Classification in Creole Louisiana. What Gross has done is combine accounts of racial classification trials involving Latinos (especially Mexicans), Indians, Asians, native Hawaiians, Armenians, Arabs, as well as the usual Anglo part-black mixed-race people. Gross even includes the Melungeons, Lumbees and others formerly called "tri-racial isolates" (See Walking Toward The Sunset: The Melungeons Of Appalachia (Melungeons: History, Culture, Ethnicity, & Literature) and ...Read more ›
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful By michiganreader on June 3, 2009
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Everyone interested in race, US legal history, citizenship, or immigration should read this book. It manages to combine close readings of freedom trials in the antebellum US, naturalization cases at the turn of the century, battles over the "freedmen," or members of African descent, of the Cherokee, Seminole, Choctaw, Creek and Chickasaw tribes, Mexican American fights against segregation, and the ways race was used to limit Native Hawaiian land rights, and provides new information and perspectives on each. This fine book shows the way that race was not defined solely or even primarily by science or descent, but was defined importantly by the "common sense" intuition of those in the dominant race that the subject deserved inclusion and citizenship. The very flexibility of this common sense notion, however, allowed concepts of race to shift to exclude new groups in new ways as laws and times changed. It conveys these insights in a style that is a pleasure to read, and full of fascinating stories and facts (like the common viewpoint that a white person could be known by the high arches of her feet, or the sad reality that a South Asian man committed suicide when the Supreme Court reversed an earlier determination that South Asians were legally white and could become citizens of the United States). Highly recommended!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful By gernab on August 20, 2009
Format: Hardcover
Fascinating and informative survey documenting how race trials reflected varying attitudes and definitions of "race". At times trial decisions were/are based on science, pseudoscience, flawed concepts of "race", "common sense" (or non-sense), genealogy, or social "performance". And the results also varied by state, and were heavily influenced by the prejudices of the time and location and composition of the jury, or the background and personality of the judge. But outcomes can be viewed as generally maintaining and reinforcing the dominant white power structure. The book parallels, in reciting various race trials, the historical narratives elaborated in (recently deceased) Prof. Ron Takaki's works. It was almost worth going through the whole book to find, on page 305, a reference to a 1987 Supreme Court opinion by Justice Byron White: "...racial categories have no scientific basis, modern or otherwise [and]... the real test of whether a group is a 'race' is whether it has suffered racial discrimination - whether it has been 'racialized', as the academics would say...'racial classifications are for the most part sociopolitical, rather than biological, in nature'". That's what this book demonstrates about the cited race determination trials.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
0 of 23 people found the following review helpful By Edgar A. Howard on August 24, 2010
Format: Paperback
This book was based on a great inaccuracy that these people were tri-racial or mixed blood. They were no more mixed race than 40% of the people of NC, SC, VA, or TN. These so called isolates or tri-racial people are not mulatto or Indian. This book was not based on original documents or sources or thought, but was cut and pasted from the heap of mistakes, misjudgments, prejudices of many misinformed writers. It is a great work of politically correct misinformation.
The people wrongly accused of being black, mulatto, Indian, or mixed are in fact Imazighen/Berbers from North Africa
that came to America on Spanish and Portuguese ships as slaves, soldiers or settlers. The Imazighen have very black hair, sometimes wavy/curly, blue-green eyes often, and varying degrees of dark skin. Unlike Indians the men have heavy body hair. Unlike Blacks they have thin lips and long, straight noses.
To advance in academia one must write PC conformant hogwash!
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?