Customer Reviews

What We Do Now

5 star:		(14)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(2)

 

 

This book was like sitting around with a bunch of really smart friends after the election and commiserating and getting mad -- except these friends had some really great ideas about what to do about it. The thing I liked was the range. There were some really interesting discussion about how to reform voting and big policy ideas. But even better was Steve Almond's essay about getting mad and sticking up for liberalism, and the one by Maud Newton about the significance of your taxes and what's done with them. The essay about how you can work for the environment was good, too -- stuff the average person can do. We need more books like this in the future, but I'm glad this one came out now because no one is talking about any of this anymore. Since the election, it's like everybody -- the candidate, the party, MoveOn, all the big shots -- have disappeared. This book makes me think this is the future: grassroots, the real power of the left.

This book examines what we in the left should do after George W. Bush was elected to a second term.

Although a majority of people were against his Iraq policies, the allegedly 'liberal' mass media made the election returns seem like a solid mandate. Bush actually had won by a slim margin of victory, and Kerry actually had put up a good showing in that close race.

Notable progressives such as Leslie Cagan and Jenifer Ponzer eschew hand-wringing and finger pointing for constructive and proactive solutions. I fear that we on the left have become too accommodating to other viewpoints without giving the American people an affirmative reason to vote for our own side.

We consequently have allowed our opponents to define (mislead others) what being a liberal is instead of reminding people that liberalism is the very same ideology which has fought against tainted food, lynching, and segregated public facilities. I personally do not want to live in an America without these and many other developments.

I also appreciated that this book offered contact information so we could get in touch with other like-minded people, and build an America which all people can be genuinely proud of. This book is not just the authors venting steam, but represents a collection of people who actually want to move others into collective action.

Notable progressives such as Leslie Cagan, Donna Brazille, and Jenifer Ponzer eschew hand-wringing and finger pointing for constructive and proactive solutions. I fear that we on the left have become too accomodating to other viewpoints, and have allowed our opponents to define (mislead others) what being a liberal is instead of reminding people that liberalism is the ideology which fought against tainted food and segregated public facilities.

I also appreciated that this that it offered contact information so we could get in touch with other like-minded people, and build an America which we are proud of. This book is not just the authors venting steam, but people wanting to move others into collective action for the common good.

This is a heartening book in dark times. The essays are all very different but i found some of their suggestions brilliant and common-sensical. I would recommend this book for the average citizen who is unhappy with the way our country is going and wants to do something about it.

A group of my friends and I have been passing this book back and forth since before Christmas. I really liked the way it says it's okay to get mad, you should, but do something constructive. For example, it's got proof from Greg Palast on how the Republicans stole Ohio. So we should be angry. One essay from Lewis Lapham says democracy is supposed to be wild and loud and that makes me think we should be shouting. That's why I was glad to read this book when I did, which was just after the election, when everybody was depressed and giving up. I'm glad somebody made this book so fast and said if you get mad you will fight longer. My friends and I had been sharing the Move On book which is good but that's what it's missing. Read this book and I guarantee it will leave you all fired up.

I got this book because I saw a program about it on CSPAN that was very stirring. Some of the contributors had gathered the day after the inauguration in the famous Cooper Union hall, where Lincoln spoke out against slavery. They were quoting him as they spoke about what they'd written and while they were all talking about different issues, they all said the same thing: don't quit, we can win, but it's a serious struggle and we must start now. The very best was the poet Robin Morgan, who read from the writings of Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Madison, Franklin, and so on, showing how secular they were; most were even atheists (Washington never even used the word "Jesus" in the thousands of letters he wrote). They worked hard to keep church and state separate in the Constitution and in the government they devised but you'd never know that from the fundamentalists in charge now.

I bought the book for Morgan's essay, but the thing I wound up loving about it was that it had other essays in it from not just other artists but from people who aren't the usual talking heads. For politicians, it's Howard Dean, for example, not one of the usual hacks. So I felt like I learned something different from all of them. But the best things in the book, to me, are the things from artists. My favorite essay is from a novelist named Steve Almond. I also liked that the book has some humor, such as a really stunning satire from another novelist, George Saunders. There's even an essay about taxes from a fiction blogger named Maud Newton who is a tax attorney, too. There's even a lovely essay from a poet suggesting poems to read to keep heart! This is very refreshing and in a funny way it made me want to rengage in the struggle in a way I haven't for a long time. It's not just about supporting stiff rich men like John Kerry, it's about the whole culture. I really love this book.

This book is a wonderful collection of 24 progressive essays that is a must read for all persons who are concerned with the direction of the USA political process. This book is to give inspiration and hope to the persons on the left who lost the election to President Bush. The left has had a failure to organize and the progressive forces did not have a plan to win the election. What happened to Ralph Nader's list of over 3,000,000 progressive voters? When the left joins together they will win.

Well, at least old "Sarah Taylor" from the well known right-wing bastion of San Francisco figured out how to match what she was saying with the proper star rating, unlike the earlier genius who wrote a nasty review and then gave the book, duh, five stars . . . . But none of these large foreheads can come up with anything other than the sixty-year-old tactic of the Communist smear. So again "Sarah Taylor" uses the obviously unread Marx to talk about this just-as-obviously unread book. I mean, heaven forefend that such a brainiac notice, let alone comprehend, a book where, for instance, there is an essay criticising NAFTA and free trade -- policies the Dems themselves instituted under Clinton. Or that there's another essay using extensive quotes from the Founding Fathers to discuss the secular intent of the Constitution. Or that there are several rollicking attacks on the mainstream media (something the right themselves seems to think they are the only ones allowed to do). I mean, as the right-wing commentaries against this book show, and as this book itself discussses, the average person on the right, not so well educated as the neocon leaders Wolfowitz et al, simply does not engage in discussion of ideas. They love to throw Marx around but clearly don't comprehend what it means or they would realize the embarrasing irrelevance in this particular discussion. So, tmore typically, they smear, they insult. It's ugly and ignorant and unpatriottic and un-Christian and childish.

And so thank God for books like this that say keep your chin up, be a patriot, and consider this wide-ranging discussion of a variety of topics as a way to get re-oriented and re-charged in the necessary counterattack against these stupid but powerful extremists. I found many great ideas here (some terrific things to do on getting environmental threats back in the discussion) and among those ideas was a discussion saying don't waste your time on the ugly "bar fighters" like we see on this page, but be more concerned with the neo con intelligencia, which is real and very smart indeed. The book also attempts something that takes a page from the right -- while the right tends to float nincompoopish books such as Ann Coulter and the Swift Boats Veterans tomes, it does, behind the scenes, conduct endless intelligent conversations within the high walls of its think tanks. In a sense, this book tries to do something similar for progressivess and liberals, but in a more open format. In that sense, it joins with Lakoff in an effort that must become more widespread.

Meanwhile, take hope from this: This book obviously stings them, and stumps them at the same time. Enjoy!

Anybody who says, as does the review below, that this book is written by people to the left of Marx--Donna Brazile? Howard Dean?--has obviously not read Marx, or apparently even read about him. So if they'd lie about that, chances are they'd lie about reading this book, too. But I have read it, and it's thoughtful, fiery, interesting, and inspiring. Just like the current generation of neocons to fear that.

And just like them to go all the way back to the Cold War to try and smear the left with accusations of Communism. What's Marx got to do with it? Organizing the left and thinking constructively about progressive politics is unpatriotic to these people . . . they're fearful of intellectual engagement, and intellectually dishonest . . . which only shows you why we need books like this. Highly recommended!

This is a book more people should be talking about. Lots of good ideas in here I never heard of before, like what Howard Dean says about instant runoff voting. None of the media seems to talk to Dean any more, so I was glad to see these editors talked to him. The George Saunders piece is sheer genius, too.

This is the only media I've seen really talking about the current situation progressives find themselves in. Not the NY Times, not NPR, not the Atlantic . . . for sure not television . . . are talking about the fact that progressives are on their own right now. That wasn't the Dems who delivered the vote in November. So it's the only handbook for "the rest of us." Thankfully, it's well done, and all the right people are in here. The essays are short and to the point. Hope they do a follow-up!