In his New York Times bestseller What Jesus Meant, Garry Wills offered a fresh and incisive reading of Jesus' teachings. Now Wills turns to Paul, whose writings have provoked controversy throughout Christian history. Upending many common assumptions, Wills argues eloquently that what Paul meant was not something contrary to what Jesus meant. Rather, the best way to know Jesus is to discover Paul. In this stimulating and masterly analysis, Wills illuminates how Paul, writing on the road and in the heat of the moment, and often in the midst of controversy, galvanized a movement and offers us the best reflection of those early times.
What Paul Meant
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Wills builds on the popularity of his bestseller What Jesus Meant in this audio version of his newest book. The apostle Paul's teachings have caused controversy almost from the minute he penned the letters to the first-century churches he helped found. His influence on church history and doctrine is incontrovertible, but his words have often provoked anger and dissension. Wills, who writes from the Catholic tradition, carefully reveals Paul's meaning by taking listeners back to the teaching of Jesus Christ to prove that Paul's words didn't contradict, but in fact explain and expound on Christ's. Wills's precise diction and preacherlike narration add to the listening experience. He sometimes moves too quickly between chapters and sections—listeners need a bit more time to adjust—and he occasionally reads quickly as well. But haste aside, listeners can't help appreciating Wills's voice, his scholarship and his conclusions.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to the Audio CD edition.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to the Audio CD edition.
From Booklist
Lacking the distracting critiques of WWJD (What Would Jesus Do?) buttons and Benedict XVI that bracketed the main text of What Jesus Meant (2006), that book's companion gets right to the point. Is Paul "the bad news man," who corrupted the teachings of Jesus into an antisexual, antiwoman, anti-Semitic apology for oppression? Apocryphal second-century writings characterize Paul as an instrument of Satan, early critics called him the father of heresies, and to him has been attributed the most stringent, damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't predestinationism. Newly translating the seven epistles now considered authentic for his references, and arguing from historical discoveries about other New Testament references to Paul, especially in Acts, Wills begs to differ. Paul's writings are the earliest Christian texts and, Wills maintains, are as orthodox as their priority suggests. They attest that Jesus is the Messiah, preaches a gospel of love, and rose from death to redeem humanity. They uphold Jewish law, repeatedly acknowledge women's equality, and discourage sex and marriage only personally, not as a matter of faith. Like Jesus, and since his epistles predate them, more authoritatively than the Gospels, Paul taught that salvation comes from the Jews. To help clarify his exculpation, Wills avoids certain words, especially church, Christians, priests, and sacraments,because nothing corresponding to their modern meanings was used by early followers of Jesus. The affect of that decision is revelatory and makes this explanation of Paul dazzlingly enlightening. Ray Olson
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
More About the Author
Garry Wills is one of the most respected writers on religion today. He is the author of Saint Augustine's Childhood, Saint Augustine's Memory, and Saint Augustine's Sin, the first three volumes in this series, as well as the Penguin Lives biography Saint Augustine. His other books include "Negro President": Jefferson and the Slave Power, Why I Am a Catholic, Papal Sin, and Lincoln at Gettysburg, which won the Pulitzer Prize.
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
135 of 145 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
`What Paul Meant' by Garry Wills is a new entry into the growing field of popular and semi-popular / semi-scholarly books on the life and doctrines of the apostle, Paul of Tarsus. Other recent entries into this sweepstakes include N. T. Wright's `What Saint Paul Really Said', `Rabbi Paul, An Intellectual Biography' by Professor of Religion, Bruce Chilton, and `The Gospel According to Paul' by Oxford (Lincoln College) don, Robin Griffith-Jones. And, this is not all of them, but only the ones I've read and reviewed recently. Pastor Wright's book, for example, is a reply to another recent book, `Paul: The Mind of the Apostle' by A. N. Wilson and Wills' book is rich with bibliographic notes to yet other, more scholarly titles. The best thing about this bumper crop is that each and every volume has been written by a major scholar in the field of New Testament studies. Most, other than Professor Wills, appear to have a Protestant affiliation. This is not surprising as ever since Martin Luther, Paul has been the hero of Protestant theology to the likes of Calvin, Wesley, Edwards, Kierkegaard, Barth, Harnack, and Bultmann.
My hunch is that the wellspring of all this popular writing has been the scholarly writings of Professor Ed. P. Sanders, who, with some others, has created a `new perspective' on Paul's intellectual background with his books published over the last thirty years. While I have been studying Paul and the New Testament for just a short time, my overall impression at the moment is that what most of these `new perspective' writers, including the authors of these popular works, is to restore us to the opinion of Albert Schweitzer, whose scholarly works on Paul were published between 60 and 90 years ago. Schweitzer's opinion was that Paul's thought was firmly rooted in the Judaism of the Pharisees, and that the century of scholarly blather preceding Schweitzer's work had done nothing to establish the contention that Paul imported Hellenistic (stoic and Platonic thought primarily) thinking into Christianity.
I have looked closely only at Paul's Epistle to the Romans, but I do know Platonism quite well and I find it totally puzzling how anyone could consider Platonism to be a more important influence on Paul than the Jewish writings in `the law and the prophets and wisdom' which we today call the `Old Testament'. Every page of Romans seems to bristle with references to Genesis, Psalms, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Leviticus and what have you. Against pages dedicated to theology of the God of Israel, I see one brief reference to a notion that may possibly have been borrowed from Plato's doctrine of innate ideas.
Unlike Pastor Wright's excellent volume, Professor Wills' book is less directed at explaining Paul's theological doctrines than it is directed at disproving many false impressions created over the years about Paul's opinions, most of which are more social or historical than theological. Like `Rabbi Paul', much of Wills' argument is with the disparities between Paul's letters and Luke's `Acts of the Apostles'. One of my early discoveries in my recent study of Paul is the fact that of all the `books' of the `New Testament', Paul's genuine letters were by far the earliest writings.
Of the thirteen (13) Pauline letters, seven (7) are believed to have been written by Paul himself. These are, in chronological order, 1 Thessalonians, Galatians, Philippians, Philemon, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, and Romans. All were written before 55 CE, decades before the first Gospels and Acts of the Apostles were written. This means that of the events in Paul's life and work, they are the only first hand reports we have, as Paul was executed around 62 CE in Rome, probably as part of Nero's `pogrom' against the Christians in his effort to blame them for start ing the Roman conflagration. So, any misconceptions about Paul that arose from reading Acts are immediately suspected.
Professor Wills addresses Pauline issues regarding relations with Peter, women, difficult gatherings, Jews, his relation to the James and the Jerusalem church, and the Roman church. Just as it is almost incomprehensible that people should attribute Paul's theology to Hellenistic sources, it is baffling how, after reading Romans, his longest and most important Epistle, one can possibly consider his writings to be the foundation of Christian anti-Semitism. On the other hand, it is quite easy to see Luther's writings as a source of Christian and German anti-Semitism, but then, Luther misinterpreted Paul's approach to Judaism to fit his own agenda.
While Wills' book is written for a lay audience, it is quite careful in avoiding misleading language and anachronistic terms which Paul himself never used, such as `church', `congregation', `Christ', and `Old Testament'. Thankfully, Wills is much better at avoiding extreme revisionism, unlike Griffith-Jones in `The Gospel According to Paul', which becomes almost unreadable until you get used to his `authentic' translations.
Wills' book may not be the best starting point for a study of Paul, as his bibliography is just a bit thin. (Wright's book is far better, although it is also more difficult reading). However, Wills' book is by far the best if you want a strong overview of Paul's thought with no interest in pursuing Pauline theology or the history of scholarship into Paul's life and writings.
This book certainly whets my appetite for reading Professor Wills' book on Augustine, on which he appears to be a major authority.
My hunch is that the wellspring of all this popular writing has been the scholarly writings of Professor Ed. P. Sanders, who, with some others, has created a `new perspective' on Paul's intellectual background with his books published over the last thirty years. While I have been studying Paul and the New Testament for just a short time, my overall impression at the moment is that what most of these `new perspective' writers, including the authors of these popular works, is to restore us to the opinion of Albert Schweitzer, whose scholarly works on Paul were published between 60 and 90 years ago. Schweitzer's opinion was that Paul's thought was firmly rooted in the Judaism of the Pharisees, and that the century of scholarly blather preceding Schweitzer's work had done nothing to establish the contention that Paul imported Hellenistic (stoic and Platonic thought primarily) thinking into Christianity.
I have looked closely only at Paul's Epistle to the Romans, but I do know Platonism quite well and I find it totally puzzling how anyone could consider Platonism to be a more important influence on Paul than the Jewish writings in `the law and the prophets and wisdom' which we today call the `Old Testament'. Every page of Romans seems to bristle with references to Genesis, Psalms, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Leviticus and what have you. Against pages dedicated to theology of the God of Israel, I see one brief reference to a notion that may possibly have been borrowed from Plato's doctrine of innate ideas.
Unlike Pastor Wright's excellent volume, Professor Wills' book is less directed at explaining Paul's theological doctrines than it is directed at disproving many false impressions created over the years about Paul's opinions, most of which are more social or historical than theological. Like `Rabbi Paul', much of Wills' argument is with the disparities between Paul's letters and Luke's `Acts of the Apostles'. One of my early discoveries in my recent study of Paul is the fact that of all the `books' of the `New Testament', Paul's genuine letters were by far the earliest writings.
Of the thirteen (13) Pauline letters, seven (7) are believed to have been written by Paul himself. These are, in chronological order, 1 Thessalonians, Galatians, Philippians, Philemon, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, and Romans. All were written before 55 CE, decades before the first Gospels and Acts of the Apostles were written. This means that of the events in Paul's life and work, they are the only first hand reports we have, as Paul was executed around 62 CE in Rome, probably as part of Nero's `pogrom' against the Christians in his effort to blame them for start ing the Roman conflagration. So, any misconceptions about Paul that arose from reading Acts are immediately suspected.
Professor Wills addresses Pauline issues regarding relations with Peter, women, difficult gatherings, Jews, his relation to the James and the Jerusalem church, and the Roman church. Just as it is almost incomprehensible that people should attribute Paul's theology to Hellenistic sources, it is baffling how, after reading Romans, his longest and most important Epistle, one can possibly consider his writings to be the foundation of Christian anti-Semitism. On the other hand, it is quite easy to see Luther's writings as a source of Christian and German anti-Semitism, but then, Luther misinterpreted Paul's approach to Judaism to fit his own agenda.
While Wills' book is written for a lay audience, it is quite careful in avoiding misleading language and anachronistic terms which Paul himself never used, such as `church', `congregation', `Christ', and `Old Testament'. Thankfully, Wills is much better at avoiding extreme revisionism, unlike Griffith-Jones in `The Gospel According to Paul', which becomes almost unreadable until you get used to his `authentic' translations.
Wills' book may not be the best starting point for a study of Paul, as his bibliography is just a bit thin. (Wright's book is far better, although it is also more difficult reading). However, Wills' book is by far the best if you want a strong overview of Paul's thought with no interest in pursuing Pauline theology or the history of scholarship into Paul's life and writings.
This book certainly whets my appetite for reading Professor Wills' book on Augustine, on which he appears to be a major authority.
20 of 20 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
I thoroughly enjoyed "What Paul Meant." Wills points out many interesting things about Paul's letters and does a good job contrasting them to information about Paul in the Acts of the Apostles. It's a very interesting book--I like his translations of Scripture. (I presume the translations are his--he never says so explicitly). Wills seems to have as good a vision of Paul and his mission, as it is possible to have almost 2000 years later. He is right in pointing out that there was no Christian Church, as we think of it now, in Paul's life time. Becoming a follower of Jesus did not mean leaving Judaism for Paul or for any other Jew.
I would have wished to know more about Wills' criteria for judging the reliability of those Christian documents that came after Paul's letters. He does believe that much of what Luke writes about Paul is not historical--Luke had a particular agenda. But he often quotes later Christian works in support of a particular point he is trying to make. For instance he cites the Letter of Clement of Rome, which suggests that Paul might have made it to Spain. But Clement almost certainly wrote after Luke. So why should we trust Clement?
I would recommend "What Paul Meant" for people interested in this great apostle, who do not want to wade through a "scholarly" book.
I would have wished to know more about Wills' criteria for judging the reliability of those Christian documents that came after Paul's letters. He does believe that much of what Luke writes about Paul is not historical--Luke had a particular agenda. But he often quotes later Christian works in support of a particular point he is trying to make. For instance he cites the Letter of Clement of Rome, which suggests that Paul might have made it to Spain. But Clement almost certainly wrote after Luke. So why should we trust Clement?
I would recommend "What Paul Meant" for people interested in this great apostle, who do not want to wade through a "scholarly" book.
17 of 17 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Review of: "What Paul Meant"
By: Garry Wills
Paul was the first letter writer of Christianity.
His epistles are considered the most pessimistic writings of the early church.
Despite the pessimism of Paul's epistles, he guided the early church and aided the growth of the early church. The author, Garry Wills, calls the growth of the early church an explosion of belief. He says of Paul: "Paul was part of this explosion of belief." Garry Wills says that Nietzsche called Paul the "dysangelist" or the bad news bearer, and "a man with a genius for hatred." This is in contrast to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, the "evangelists" or the good news bearers.
The author asks the question: "how much of this notoriety is deserved?" His answer: "very little."
This book uses seven of Paul's letters: "Letter to the Thessalonians", "Letter to the Galatians", "Letter to the Philippians", "Letter to Philemon", "First Letter to the Corinthians", "Second Letter to the Corinthians" and "Letter to the Romans." These are the letters whose authorship is not disputed.
Author Wills shows that Paul echoed and amplified the message of love spoken by Jesus. Paul had the same message of love as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John when he reports on the teaching of Jesus.
This book also gives details of the life of Paul and of the history of early Christianity.
See Also:
What the Gospels Meant
and
What Jesus Meant
This book is a good amplification of the meaning of Paul's letters. It is clear and easy to understand and the reasoning is very sound.
I recommend "What Paul Meant" as a supplemental guide when reading the New Testament or as a stand alone text.
By: Garry Wills
Paul was the first letter writer of Christianity.
His epistles are considered the most pessimistic writings of the early church.
Despite the pessimism of Paul's epistles, he guided the early church and aided the growth of the early church. The author, Garry Wills, calls the growth of the early church an explosion of belief. He says of Paul: "Paul was part of this explosion of belief." Garry Wills says that Nietzsche called Paul the "dysangelist" or the bad news bearer, and "a man with a genius for hatred." This is in contrast to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, the "evangelists" or the good news bearers.
The author asks the question: "how much of this notoriety is deserved?" His answer: "very little."
This book uses seven of Paul's letters: "Letter to the Thessalonians", "Letter to the Galatians", "Letter to the Philippians", "Letter to Philemon", "First Letter to the Corinthians", "Second Letter to the Corinthians" and "Letter to the Romans." These are the letters whose authorship is not disputed.
Author Wills shows that Paul echoed and amplified the message of love spoken by Jesus. Paul had the same message of love as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John when he reports on the teaching of Jesus.
This book also gives details of the life of Paul and of the history of early Christianity.
See Also:
What the Gospels Meant
and
What Jesus Meant
This book is a good amplification of the meaning of Paul's letters. It is clear and easy to understand and the reasoning is very sound.
I recommend "What Paul Meant" as a supplemental guide when reading the New Testament or as a stand alone text.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
deeper
Paul is an interesting and important character in the development of the early church and the only first hand written account concerning the early Church. Read more
Published 7 months ago by mikewd
5.0 out of 5 stars
Highly recommended
Wills is always an entertaining writer. What I found most interesting about the book was:
1) Wills' original translations of the letters. Read more
1) Wills' original translations of the letters. Read more
Published 12 months ago by DoctorD
1.0 out of 5 stars
WHAT GOD MEANT!
AH, C'MON, PROFESSOR WILLS - Give us the real stuff! Tell us what God meant! The premise of the book is so fatuous that it's roll-off-the-sofa funny! TRC
Published on September 1, 2010 by T.R. Catanzarite
5.0 out of 5 stars
What Paul Meant
Book received in very good condition in a timely manner as opposed to What Jesus Meant from betterworldbook which came with cover held together with scotch tape.
Published on March 23, 2010 by Richard E. Squillace
4.0 out of 5 stars
Unpacking Paul
Paul of Tarsus is the second most important person in the history of Christianity after Jesus himself. Read more
Published on November 25, 2009 by M. L. Asselin
5.0 out of 5 stars
Paul comes alive
Garry Wills did a great job by writing complex Paul with easy-to-follow style of writing and related information. Read more
Published on May 5, 2009 by Somachristou
3.0 out of 5 stars
Scholarly and theological. Not for fans of "What Jesus meant"
I am nobody to judge the value and the authenticity of this book, which effectively refute Acts written by Luke. Read more
Published on January 25, 2009 by ServantofGod
4.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting Notion
Wills has written three books of interest: What Paul Meant, What Jesus Meant, and What the Gospels Meant. Read more
Published on October 2, 2008 by Layod Sivad
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent Analysis!
Gary Wills does an excellent job of analyzing Paul's writings and his place in the early Church. he debunks a number of myths and clarifies Paul's role in evangelizing the... Read more
Published on September 2, 2008 by Guy M. Sanders
4.0 out of 5 stars
Not perfect, but still quite good
Wills' earlier book, "What Jesus Meant", was truly inspired -- engaging from start to finish, it challenged many of the assumptions of modern Christianity about what it means to be... Read more
Published on July 12, 2008 by Gregory J. Casteel
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Listmania!
|
|
