- Explore more great deals on thousands of titles in our Deals in Books store.
Mendacity has increasingly become a journalistic touchstone for analyzing America's international relations. Alterman, best known as a columnist for the Nation and author of What Liberal Media?, presents his case for what he calls four key lies U.S. presidents told world citizens during the 20th century. Franklin Roosevelt lied, he says, about the nature of the Yalta accords, creating the matrix for a half-century of anti-Soviet paranoia. John F. Kennedy lied about the compromise that settled the Cuban missile crisis, and kept the Cold War alive by humiliating the U.S.S.R. Lyndon Johnson lied about the second Tonkin Gulf incident, and moved the U.S. down a slippery slope that destroyed his hopes of creating a Great Society. Ronald Reagan lied about his policies in Central America, creating a secret and illegal foreign policy that resulted in "the murder of tens of thousands of innocents." Alterman interprets this pattern as a consequence of mistaken American beliefs: belief in providence watching over the U.S., belief in American moral superiority abroad and belief, unfulfilled, in unyielding commitment to democracy at home—all of these things are easy to stump on, but impossible, Alterman argues, to demonstrate. These "delusions" in turn create an unrealistic picture of the world, one immune to education regarding reality. All of this, predictably enough, leads to George W. Bush, whose administration is dismissed as a "post-truth presidency." The American-centered perspective of Alterman's case studies overlooks the many times when the U.S. was outmaneuvered (or deceived) by other players to a point where truth became obscured by means other than executive mendacity. Alterman also allows little room for mistakes or plain incompetence on the part of the administrations in question. But his conceit is otherwise carefully and compellingly executed, and sets the stage for debate.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
In 1964, as Congress prepared to vote on the Gulf of Tonkin resolution authorizing the use of force in Vietnam, Senator William Fulbright said that he simply did not "normally assume" that "a President lies to you." That was a mistake, according to Alterman's compendious history of Presidential lying. Alterman, a columnist for The Nation, refers to the Bush Administration as a "post-truth Presidency," but in general he is hardest on Democrats. He writes of Roosevelt's "deliberate mendacity" at Yalta and Kennedy's "nasty double game" during the Cuban missile crisis—tactics that, respectively, he claims, started and deepened the Cold War. Alterman argues that such behavior, whatever its justification, invariably exacts a price—L.B.J.'s lies about the Tonkin incident consumed his Presidency—and that the greatest dangers come when an Administration starts to believe its own lies.
Copyright © 2005 The New Yorker --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
This is an excellently written book that is concise and devastatingly accurate in describing how degenerate the American political system is. Read morePublished 3 months ago by H. Campbell
Riviting tale of the lies and deceit of those you may have voted for. Things are as they seem and the truth is best served by telling it.Published 21 months ago by Lee Brown
So three democratic POTUSes are responsible for our current political catastrophe. Whudda thunk it...
FDR, JFK and LBJ. Read more
I highly recommend this book for its studies of several recent (post WWII) situations in which circumstances caused the US executive power to lie or to let itself be deluded. Mr. Read morePublished on May 28, 2012 by Seoigheach
First, the highlights:
For people fairly acquainted with each of the four highlighted episodes, there is not a lot new here in terms of facts, but the analysis of... Read more
While I appreciate Alterman's accounts of the various costs of the official lying, I'm a little mystified at his conclusions about such lying. Read morePublished on March 4, 2007 by Publius
Altho, the prevarications of earlier presidents are not included, this book weaves a fastenating tale of how one lie begets another, leaving a trail of falsehoods paving the past. Read morePublished on February 18, 2007 by John V. Vaisvil
Since the Watergate scandal, the assumption among the American press and people that the president always tells the truth has been destroyed. Read morePublished on January 21, 2007 by Newton Ooi
we will need another volume devoted to his "evolving" reasons for invading Iraq or for torture or for the wall of shame, etc. Read morePublished on October 27, 2006 by C. Scanlon