1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
When Seducing a Spy, June 7, 2007
Pretty darned good! Different new twist- Lady Tess is the government secret agent and Heath's her old tutor's son, turned barrister. He's sent by another branch of the government to investigate her when her name is connected to a crime, not realizing what she's been up to in the intervening years.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
When Seducing a Spy, July 24, 2007
Shortly after seeing his childhood friend again, Heath Bartlett is shocked to hear she is being accused of a crime. As an Officer of the Crown, Heath is assigned to investigate the lovely Lady Tess Golding. While he doesn't want to believe she is guilty, Heath will do whatever it takes to solve the case.
Tainted by scandal, Lady Tess Golding is not what she seems. Tess has secrets that must be kept to protect her country. Unfortunately, Heath Bartlett is a threat to her way of life. Heath tempts Tess with his passionate embraces and seductive kisses. If Tess isn't careful, she will give Heath more than the secrets she keeps, she will give him her heart.
I adore romances involving childhood friends. Although I never experienced this type of romance, it still appeals to my romantic soul. One of my favorite elements of When Seducing a Spy is the magnetism Heath and Tess share. Sari Robins made it clear these two are soul mates that must have each other to find true happiness. I adored the way Heath thought of Tess constantly and that Tess was unable to deny her passion for Heath.
Although When Seducing a Spy is part of a series, it can be read as a stand alone. I'm sure that after you finish When Seducing a Spy, you will, like me, rush out to purchase the first two in this series.
Annmarie reviewed for Joyfully Reviewed
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Poorly structured and poorly executed, April 30, 2007
I think it's understood when one picks up a trashy romance novel that one does not expect prose of Austen's calibre. I've read a good number of Regency romance novels, and the majority of them betrayed the lack of a competent editor (or any editor, perhaps). This novel is no different, with its atrocious grammatical errors and lapses of anachronistic diction. However, I've read many novels that are very engrossing and entertaining despite lapses in writing style or historical authenticity. This novel, however, is so poorly written that it is barely enjoyable. Plot-wise, the premise is shaky, to say the least, and the development is barely credible. The only thing remarkable about the ending is the blatant deus ex machina. In reading this book, I get the sense that the author was trying to hint at secrets from the past of the two main characters, and slowly reveal them along the way. However, what she achieves is a series of confusingly vague references punctuated by intermittent and lengthy exposition, which makes the narrative take on a plodding - if not outright funereal - pace. That is, until we get to the 300-page mark, and the author seems to realize she needs to wrap things up if she's going to get to a resolution before her reader gets tired of the book.
As for the characterization, it is incomplete at best. Many of the characters' actions are insufficiently motivated. For example, the author quickly sets up an adversarial air between the hero and heroine, and hints that it is due to friction arising from some past event. Eventually, however, the reader will realize that no events took place in their past that should cause mutual emnity (I guess it's plausible for the lady to have felt uncomfortable in the hero's presence at first, considering what she believed at the time, but there was no reason at all for the hero to treat her initially as anything other than an estranged friend). Her two protagonists seem to have a penchant for willy-nilly blowing hot and cold, conveniently allowing her to create more tension and dragging out the inevitable dissolution of their obvious misunderstandings. The most egregious instance is probably one scene when the heroine is one the verge of explaining away a major point of friction, but instead chooses to fly off in a fury. I suppose one could argue that she felt she owed no explaination to one who had wounded her pride, but a heroine who is so blindly willful is hardly sympathetic.
It seems that the author had great ambitions for this novel. It had many elements that would have made this story into an imaginative and complex work. Sadly, the effort fell short, and what we have is a pulp novel bloated with contrived melodramatics, starved of believable character development, and barely held together by a half-baked plot.
Long story short? Don't read this book, it's not worth your time.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
