The book is a fast-paced read and very well argued.
Plantinga lays out his thesis (related to the concord/conflict related to both theistic belief/metaphysical naturalism) in a very articulate manner.
Even for those that disagree, Plantinga's careful approach should provide the reader with ample material to assess their position.
Not very challenigng, and he does not those who tend to share his views very well.Published 3 days ago by Jon E. Braun
At the outset, Alvin Plantinga states the thesis of this book as "there is superficial conflict but deep concord between science and theistic religion, but superficial concord... Read morePublished 1 month ago by Peter S. Bradley
The author's scholarship and thoroughness of argument at times becomes obscured by the complexity of his syllogisms. Read morePublished 1 month ago by The Rev. Hugh Dickinson
This is not an easy book but it is rewarding if you are willing to follow through with the careful argumentation. Read morePublished 1 month ago by Joel S. Frady
The author has a great grasp of logic and philosophy. He is able to dissect the logic behind each of the arguments for evolution, unguided evolution, cosmology, multiple... Read morePublished 2 months ago by Chet Haibel
An obligatory reading for everyone who wants to understand the deep concord between science and the theist worldview as well as the areas of superficial conflict between them. Read morePublished 2 months ago by Julio de Alencastro Graca Mereb
Be prepared for a very dense read, but this is an exceptionally good book that deconflicts science and religion. Read morePublished 2 months ago by D. Shaw
Alvin Plantinga lays out his case thoroughly. His claim is that the conflict really lies between science and naturalism, not science and theism. Read morePublished 2 months ago by Clint Field
It is a good book! I have read about Alvin Platinga elsewhere, but reading him directly is a wonderful experience. Read morePublished 2 months ago by Luis A. R. Branco