18 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The seer and the analyst, November 15, 2007
This review is from: Where Three Roads Meet (Canongate Myths) (Hardcover)
This book is another volume in that excellent undertaking by Canongate to have ancient myths retold in a contemporary re-imagining. (See my Amazon reviews of Margaret Atwood's Penelopiad and Jeanette Winterson's Weight.) Here we have Tiresias, the blind seer of Greek Antiquity, paying several visits to Sigmund Freud in London in 1938 when Freud was in the last stages of his distressing cancer.
Tiresias plays a part in the myth of Oedipus, and in their conversation the meaning of the Oedipus myth, to which Freud had given one particular interpretation, is re-examined.
However, it takes some time for Tiresias to work round to the story of Oedipus. The first half of the book is more concerned with the story of Tiresias himself; how he was apprenticed to the Oracle of Apollo at Delphi, how occasionally he acted not so much as a translator for the obscure sounds made by the Pythia when the god spoke through her, but found himself a direct vehicle for those revelations; how he was stricken blind by Athene and then left Delphi to become a peripatetic seer. The dialogue in this part of the book is entertaining, though not particularly challenging. Freud is shown as an extreme rationalist, interpreting every myth about the gods as displacements of infantile desire or as the need to rationalize natural injustice, and as rejecting the objective significance of visions. Tiresias is here, I think, a somewhat Jungian figure, for Jung would certainly differ from Freud in taking the truths of myths to be more profound than that; but I do think that the historical Freud had a little more respect for myths than is implied in this dialogue.
The book becomes deeper, I think, from around page 96. It begins, perhaps, with Salley Vickers' closer knowledge of Greek than Freud may have had. (Freud is quoted on p.23 as saying that his Greek `could be better'.) So the club-footed and boastful Oedipus, now the husband of his mother Jocasta, ignored the literal meaning of his name - `swollen [oidi] feet' (duly said by Freud to stand for the tumescent member) for `knowing [oida] foot', because he had been able to solve the feet-related riddle of the Sphinx. Tiresias interprets: `He has to know ... to avert a direr knowledge': the direr knowledge Oedipus had himself had from the oracle, that he was destined to kill his father and marry his mother (who, he thought, were the king and queen of Corinth, who had adopted him when the queen had found him abandoned). The high drama of the scene where Oedipus discovers the truth is admirably conveyed in Teresias' telling; and the way Freud matches parts of his theories to the tale Tiresias has to tell is also very well done.
And then Salley Vickers introduces, through Tiresias, something of her own take into the story: Tiresias wonders why Freud had paid so little attention to Jocasta's side of the story: that Jocasta was glad that her husband had been killed since he had been, she thought, the only person who knew of their joint guilt in having tried to kill their son - yet at the same time that she must have known that the man who was now sharing her bed was actually her son. And Tiresias points out to Freud that Oedipus, at least, had not been subject to the Oedipus Complex: he had NOT wanted to kill his father and marry his mother. What drove him was, in the end, his insistence on knowing the terrible truth, which he wrested by threats from Tiresias and others. In the end, he no longer evaded the `direr knowledge' but insisted on learning that also, whatever the cost. Oedipus at the end was a stoic; and so too was Freud in his final suffering: the book portrays him as gentle, friendly, and ever curious. At the very end the Eumenides, the Kindly Ones, called Oedipus, and (so Tiresias has it) the blind and crippled king became holy, the original meaning of that word being hale, healthy, whole. Freud would have agreed that that ought to be the ultimate result of self-knowledge.
This is a fine re-telling of the story, and the hard-back edition of the book is beautifully printed and a pleasure to handle.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Intriguing premise, well executed, February 20, 2009
I am a sucker for the revisitation of old myths in new ways. Whether "God's Behaving Badly" which put the Greek Gods in a London flat, "The Minotaur Takes a Cigarette Break" where we find the monster is still alive and working as a short order cook, or Atwood's retelling of the Iliad and Odyssey from the perspective of Odysseus's wife in the wonderful "Penelopiad," I love reading authors riffs on these stories of my youth. With that disclosure, I cannot help but recommend "Where Three Roads Meet," Sally Vicker's creative and thought provoking work on Oedipus, the myth the complex, and the play.
At first glance, the premise appears both odd and in certain ways obvious. As Freud lays dying of mouth cancer, he is visited again and again by the blind prophet Tiresias. As the father of psychoanalysis slowly and painfully succumbs to his illness, the Greek ghost tell his life story, with a particular focus on the story of Oedipus. Critiquing Freud's theory, Tiresias examines the myth from different perspectives, wondering over various characters motivations and possible willful blindness, even as the dying genius must face his own morality.
One should note, that this novel is not for everyone. Composed entirely of dialogue between these two characters, it at times reads almost like a play, and a rather "talky" one at that. Readers unfamiliar or uninterested in the original Greek story and plays and/or uninterested in the history of psychoanalysis may feel the urge to put it down. In my reading, however, Vicker's has done a wonderful job, both in showing a remarkable depth of knowledge in her subject matter and offering it for consideration in an entirely fresh way. If you are inclined to choose to stand where three roads meet, you are sure to enjoy the view.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Modern Myths, June 18, 2008
This review is from: Where Three Roads Meet (Canongate Myths) (Hardcover)
The previous reviewer has encapsulated the actual story so perfectly that there is absolutely no point in going over it. Salley Vickers is a very erudite writer with very obvious connections to the world of psychiatry and her prose in this book is brief and to the point, but I cannot say that I ENJOYED this book as it would take someone with a much deeper understanding of the subject than I have..I'm simply not up to it! I acknowledge her cleverness and writing skills so gave it five stars but was rather glad to finish the book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No