Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Color:
  • Whirlpool WFW94HEAW Duet 4.3 Cu. Ft. White Stackable With Steam Cycle Front Load Washer - Energy Star
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available
  • To view this video download Flash Player
      

Whirlpool WFW94HEAW Duet 4.3 Cu. Ft. White Stackable With Steam Cycle Front Load Washer - Energy Star


Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
  • 12 Wash Cycles
  • 5 Temperature Settings
  • Precision Dispense
  • Energy Star
See more product details

Product Information

Technical Details
Brand NameWhirlpool
Model InfoWFW94HEAW
Item Weight250 pounds
Product Dimensions32.8 x 27 x 38.5 inches
Item model numberWFW94HEAW
Part Number WFW94HEAW
ColorWhite
Manufacturer Warranty Free 10yr Warranty on Major Components
  
Additional Information
ASINB008LZOUGG
Best Sellers Rank #11,381 in Appliances (See top 100)
Shipping Weight250 pounds
Date First AvailableAugust 30, 2012
  
Feedback
 Would you like to give feedback on images?
 


Product Description

4.3 cu. ft. Duet ® Steam Front Load Washer with Precision Dispense

Elevate fabric care and virtually eliminate pretreating. This Whirlpool ® HE front load washer features Precision Dispense, which takes the guess work out of adding detergent, bleach and other additives by releasing them at the correct time during the cycle for optimal fabric care. Detergent mixes with water to penetrate fabrics and virtually eliminate pretreating. Plus, with the 12-Hour FanFresh ® option with Dynamic Venting Technology ® selected, you can tumble clothes for up to 12 hours after the cycle ends, so you can wash and dry a small load right in the washer.* Cut down on the amount of laundry you do each week, with a 4.3 cu. ft. capacity, you can wash up to 20 pairs of jeans in a single load.** *Based on a 2-lb load of lightweight fabrics. **Various sizes.

Model Number Variations

This model is similar to these older Whirlpool brand models:

WFW94HEXL


Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

2.1 out of 5 stars
5 star
2
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
1
1 star
5
See all 8 customer reviews
Bigger drum doesn't mean bigger loads.
JL
This washer broke on me less than five months after purchasing it.
K. Carmical
Absolutely the worst washer I've ever used.
Connie J Tabor

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful By K. Carmical on October 16, 2013
This washer broke on me less than five months after purchasing it. The repair service has been to my house twice now, and it is still not repaired. With all the money Whirlpool has spent on the repairs, they could have saved themselves money and a customer by simply replacing it (the repairs have now cost them more than I paid for the washer to begin with). More than a month without a washer, and after spending thousands, I still have to go to a coin laundry. I'll never buy another Whirlpool product as long as I live.

-Edit-
Whirlpool replaced the washer after I contacted the Better Business Bureau. The issue was resolved favorably, but I wish they had done it sooner and without me having to contact the BBB.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful By Craig J on March 19, 2013
We've had this washer for 3 months now and we love it. Although it is true that some of the programs seem like they take longer, it makes it up with how rung out the clothes are after the spin cycle. Another thing we do is that if the clothes aren't super dirty we'll use the quick wash setting which only goes for 30 min as opposed to 60 with standard cycles.

It is quiet and cleans the clothes well. A big upgrade from what we had before.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
26 of 32 people found the following review helpful By JL on June 24, 2013
Don't buy if you want clean clothes. Let's dispense with the other reviews that want to complain about longer wash times or doesn't have this feature or that feature. This unit sucks hands down. I am a working mother of two toddlers. I come from a Samsung front loader so I understand longer wash times, sometimes smelly ring, yada, yada, yada. Those are all things that come with a front loading washing machine. I have used this model for two months now and let me tell you - find something else!!!
Cons (lots of them)
1) Don't expect to get clean clothes. I don't always have time to treat my children's otherwise disgusting dirty clothes. However, I never have had to either. My Samsung would handle two or three day old laundry no problem. So naturally I expect a newer, more updated model to do the same. NOT! This thing can't even handle simple stains. When I first starting noticing stains come through the wash I just figured I wasn't used to dialing the cycles in and would eventually get to the magic combination. Even with steam this thing can't clean. Even with pretreat this thing can't clean. Even with the "soak" option this thing can't clean. I am returning and going for another brand all together.
2) Again I am a working mom and will usually put a load of clothes in the washer at night to then put them in the dryer in the morning. The load smells terrible, even if I get to it first thing in the morning. The "Fan Dry" option is a nice gimmick but only works if you have a very small load. I could leave clothes in my Samsung for a night+day and not have the funk that's coming out of this Whirlpool only after a few hours.
3) Clothes are not as soft.
Read more ›
5 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Angela Gunther on September 17, 2014
I bought this washer (along with the matching dryer), less than 3 years ago. At first we thought it was a really nice set and were excited to have a "nice, very expensive" set that would last us for years to come. Fast forward 2 1/2 years. Our washer just stopped working. We immediately called Whirlpool. When we were on the phone with them, they gave us 2 options. We could pay a little over $600 to get the washer fixed, OR we could buy an extended warranty for $350. No brainier, right? Again, wrong. After buying the extended warranty (remind you, FROM Whirlpool), we set up an appointment for the service company to come and look at our washer. 3 days later he showed up and told us he needed to order 2 parts and would call us by the end of the week. When the end of the week came and we did not hear from the service provider, we called them. At that point, we were told that the part was on back order and we should call back in a few days to check on delivery. Long story short, after 4 weeks, no calls, unanswered messages and no washer, we started calling Whirlpool directly. Whirlpool told me that THEY have the part, and I could purchase it for $300 and give it to the service company (?!?). I had already paid for the warranty and it should be covered. When I called the service company back and told them that Whirlpool had that part, they told me they "didn't get their parts from Whirlpool", I asked again when the part would be in. He told me "it's on back-order, I have no way of knowing when it will be in". When asked him what else could be done, he responded "What do you want me to do? Call Japan and have them ship the part faster?". Wow.
After that experience, I called whirlpool back to let them low how I was treated by the service company that they sold me.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again