10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Poorly written, boring thriller, January 16, 2006
This book is so hard to follow--you never really know what is happening. You have no feeling for or insight into any of the characters. The book is poorly written and full of inaccuracies about Chicago and the 1893 Columbian Exposition. I couldn't believe it when I read a passage describing the sun setting over Lake Michigan!!!!! The lake is east of the city. The sun always sets in the west!! This is a simple fact that anyone with a map could figure out. This man is from Chicago?
If you want to read a good, non-fiction book on the Columbian Exposition read Erik Larson's "The Devil in the White City." If you want to read a well-written mystery read Sue Grafton.
Don't believe the rave reviews of this book. They must be written by the author's family and friends.
I'm mad I wasted my time and money on this book. Don't waste yours.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Historical inaccuracies and opaque, hazy writing doom this book, December 7, 2005
This review is from: The White City (Hardcover)
I found several historical miscues in the first few pages. The Ferris Wheel running since May? Women wearing hoops? Did Michon do any research at all? Even aside from the obvious screw-ups (for no reason -- I'm willing to accept changing history if it needs to be changed for the story, like the ways he changed Holmes, but things like a throwaway line about the Ferris Wheel or the clothing? The only reason that's mucked up is sloppiness), the writing style is practically impenetrable. I found it impossible to tell what was going on, what was happening to whom, or who any of the characters were supposed to be. They had no identifying characteristics. None. And the murders seemed to be created to be as gross and shocking as possible, without really adding up to anything in terms of creating a profile for the killer.
I was really disappointed in this book. Oh, and I don't know who the Husker was because I didn't bother to finish, which is practically unheard of for me and mysteries.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
13 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Dissenting Voice, February 18, 2004
This review is from: The White City (Hardcover)
This is a strange fever dream of a novel. It's the author's first book, set in Chicago during the Columbian Exposition.
A serial killer nicknamed Clemantis, the Husker, is on the loose in Chicago, torturing and murdering small boys and leaving their brutalized bodies in the fair grounds. When the young son of a prominent citizen goes missing, the police are forced to take notice.
Dr Elizabeth Hadley, a forensic psychologist, is called in to assist in finding the killer. She is one of the first people working in this field.
Chicago is the main character in this book and Michod does a wonderful job of creating a Chicago that is brutal, atmospheric, and frightening. Hieronymus Bosch would have felt right at home in this Chicago.
Winds howl, blood runs in the street, and desperate men threaten strikes against the meat packing industry, whose injustices are vividly portrayed. Meanwhile, the monied elite are blind to the suffering of the less fortunate.
However, the human characters in this book are sketchily drawn, and I found their speech and their reaction to events inappropriate and unbelievable. I could not find a single character to like or identify with.
I also found the author's writing style to be unecessarily odd and awkward.
I am puzzled at the author's need to invent a semi-fictional serial killer when there was a real one working the Columbian Exposition. H.H. Holmes, the mad doctor and killer of young women who registered at his hotel of horrors is a more interesting character than Michod's Husker.
I imagine Michod reasoned that there had been enough written about Holmes's activities--notably the earlier non-fiction book 'Devil in the White City.'
I did not like this book. Yet, several days after finishing it, I find it still much on my mind. So what does that mean? No idea. You'll have to try it and judge for yourself, I guess...
I give it an 'A' for atmosphere, a 'C' for character development and plot, and a 'C-' for writing style.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No