Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Best Book Ever on the Velvet Underground, June 11, 2009
While there are many good books out on the Velvet Underground, and it might seem that there's really nothing more to write on this deeply influential band, this book adds a great deal of material to the well known saga on the band's long and often tortured history, with a literal day by day chronicle of their gigs, recordings, film work (with Andy Warhol), and internal struggles. As someone who saw the band during their gigs at The Dom way back in 1966, and also at their last stand at Max's Kansas City in the summer of 1970, I have to say that the superb detail and remarkable research of this volume lifts it above conventional rock and roll biography, into the level of serious musical scholarship. Well written, densely detailed, and carefully considered, and happily missing the tone of the frenzied fan, this is the definitive book on the Velvets, and should remain so for some time to come. It doesn't list the new Gymnasium tapes that recently surfaced, with a previously unknown song included in the set -- "I'm Not A Young Man Anymore", a great song -- but that's probably because it happened so recently. Other than that, which is a minor quibble, this is an incredible piece of work, and an absolute must for anyone interested in the Velvets, rock and roll, or popular music in the 20th century.
|
|
|
12 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Deducting a couple of stars for atrocious editing, June 15, 2009
Just received this book last week and delved right in to a very eagerly-awaited tome
on the Velvets. I'll try to boil down my issues with it as succinctly as possible: Unterberger's a very good writer, his research and attention to detail are excellent, and Jawbone's designers/artists did a bang-up job designing and packaging the volume, but why, oh why, is the proofreading and editing of this book so ABSOLUTELY HIDEOUS? It's generally really, really bad, tons and tons of glaring mistakes, misspellings of names (John Cassavettes for John Cassavetes!) that are easily fact-checked online or elsewhere, and repeated text, omitted conjunctive words and phrases, and irritating substitutions like Marsh 5 (!) for an entry on Nico meeting the Roling Stones in London in 1965 that should have been March 5 (obviously). There's no excuse for a commercial publisher to let titles go to press in this sorry a form; the field is getting more and more like this, and it tends to mar an otherwise wonderful project, such as this one. Next time, guys, you have to go against the current trend towards stinginess and austerity and crack open that piggy bank and actually PAY a proofreader/copy editor to go over the manuscript as thoroughly as possible, so this type of thing doesn't keep happening. A few errors wouldn't be so bad, but when it keeps happening, seemingly in every other paragraph, it gets really irritating really fast, and interrupts one's reading experience. It also calls into question the integrity of the writing, editing and research of the author and/or publisher, even though we know in this instance that it's obviously the fault of the publishers/editors and not the author, since Unterberger has clearly delivered a solid book here, it's just that the ball was dropped, editorially-speaking, big time. I'm going to try, as a major Velvet Underground fan and scholar for many years, to keep enjoying this otherwise well-done book, although it's tough at times, given the above glaring issues, to do so. I loved Jawbone's earlier tome by Thomas Jerome Seabrook on David Bowie's Berlin period, Bowie in Berlin, which was likewise excellent but not given, as I recall, to such egregious errors and typos, and shoddy editing. Better luck next time, guys: I'd be praising this book to the skies if not for the total lack of editorial control exhibited herein. As it is, we have a "classic" book with tons of worthy material, let down by the seeming incompetence of its own publishers/editors. Not a great situation.
|
|
|
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Book But........, August 17, 2009
This is an incredible book! If only the print size was bigger, it's like trying to read the bottom of a loan agreement. I can't see anybody else covering this story this well. Good Job Richie!!!
|
|
|
|