Customer Reviews


2 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews
Most Helpful First | Newest First

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Disappointing, June 12, 2008
I waited two months to receive this in the mail and was pretty disappointed in it when it arrived. The stone was barely blue and looked like a big, cheap, fake diamond. The setting, viewed from the side, was unattractive. The band and setting were thinner than I'd gathered from the photo. I supposed you could call it "delicate," but to me it looked flimsy. I returned it right away. It just looked cheap, and not like the photo.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Beautiful, but questionable quality, May 12, 2008
I received this ring for Mother's Day and was initially delighted. It's very beautiful and delicate looking, and I was surprised by the sparkle and color of the aquamarine. The diamond accents are very tiny (much smaller than they appear in the picture) and there are small white gold "blobs" between the diamonds to create the appearance of more diamonds than there actually are, which was disappointing but it wasn't really noticeable unless looking closely. Unfortunately, within hours I noticed that one of the side stones was already missing :(. I'm getting a replacement rather than just a refund, because it's still a pretty ring for the price. If I had spent more money I would expect higher quality, but for under $200 I'm willing to deal with the hassle of a return. Hopefully the replacement will last longer.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product