Customer Reviews

Whittington

5 star:		(10)
4 star:		(5)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(2)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

Whittington by Alan Armstrong exemplifies everything that's wrong with the Newbery awards - it's a cute book about a cat, not much more. Don't get me wrong, I did like the story, but there's as much wrong with the story as there is right. It does, however, have all the ingredients of an award winner and stuff much older readers than the intended audience can get nostalgic over.

Whittington is the story of a cat who comes to live in a barnyard full of down-and-out animals with Ben and Abby, a brother and sister who spend their time listening to a tale told by the cat. Ben suffers from dyslexia, which is embarrassing to him. Ben's struggles with dyslexia are mixed with Whittington's story. This is an interesting approach.

However, there are several things wrong with the story. First, the story often reads more like a history and science lesson, with some of the exposition delivered as if from a text book. Second, it's hard to care about the characters as they are shallow and for the most part one dimensional. At times, Ben's struggles seem a footnote or after thought to make the book itself more interesting. As a father of a child with dyslexia, I know it is a serious problem, but it has become an overused plot device in many children's books.

Overall, this one's okay, but I think comparisions to E.B. White are out of line. This is not E.B. White or anything close.

"Whittington" exemplifies everything I love about the Newbery Awards. Every year the winners of the Newbery are announced during the American Library Association Mid-Winter Meeting. Sometimes the Award winner is undeserving. Sometimes the Honor Winners are exemplary. And sometimes there is one book that is so completely random and out of the blue that it baffles everyone who hears its name. This year, "Whittington" was that book (though "Show Way" probably got a few gasps for the category in which it won). It sort of came out of left field and while a perfectly nice book and a good tale of one boy's battle with dyslexia, I'm disinclined to say it was one of the best books of the year. A perfectly harmless barnyard tale. Just don't get overly excited about it.

All right my children, who here amongst you can tell me the tale of Dick Whittington? Anyone? Anybody? Well that's not surprising. Ole Dick just doesn't get the attention he once did. Even Fairy Tale Theater never got around to filming the Whittington fable. In this book, however, Dick is introduced to a whole new generation of children via the voice and stylings of a singular cat. On a rural farm, a worse-for-the-wear tom makes the acquaintance of a barnyard full of animals. A good ratter as ever there was, the cat has named himself Whittington. When questioned about his name he explains that he is a direct descendant of Dick Whittington's cat, and has given himself a moniker appropriately. Now on this farm are two children, Abby and Ben. Abby does well enough in school but Ben struggles with words and numbers. It is clear that he has a reading impediment and a temper to boot. As Ben, Abby, and the barn's inhabitants sit and listen to Whittington slowly tell the tale of his ancestor's master, Ben draws courage and resolve from the story and decides that if Dick could overcome countless hardships to win in the end, so too can he.

The book draws some nice parallels between Dick and his cat, and Ben and Whittington. Where Dick was led to fame and fortune through the advice of his pet, Ben is led towards learning how to read through Whittington's encouragement and tales. Along the way Armstrong chooses to sprinkle the book with small stories about the other animals' adventures on the farm. The grandfather of the children, Bernie, has a kind heart and anyone with a sick or injured animal will place that creature in Bernie's care. As a result, the farm is a mishmash of animals caring for one another's young and interacting (once Whittington brings the rats in line) in relative harmony. Armstrong has made a kind of E.B. White decision to allow the children to understand the speech of the animals around them. It seems fairly clear that the adults cannot talk to the barn critters, but the children listen to them for advice or stories constantly. It makes the book an alternative selection if you've a child who's a fan of "Charlotte's Web" and wants something similar.

I don't think I'm the only one who gets Alan Armstrong mixed up with Alan Ahlberg. Both write for the same age group and the illustrations in Whittington that are done by S.D. Schindler bear more than a passing resemblance to Ahlberg's dark side of felines, "The Improbable Cat". If you've a kid who loves them kitties and would like lots of books about them, definitely be a little twisted and recommend both books together. Now the illustrations in this book are quite nice. They're little pen-and-ink affairs with Schindler drawing some truly excellent cats. He never quite gets their eyes right but when it comes to kitties stretching, showing their tummies, or stalking off, no one captures the essence of the feline better. He also stays true to the text. When the book says that Bernie looked like Abraham Lincoln a little, the face of Bernie that Schindler chose to include does have a kind of craggy Old Abe quality to it.

The story slows down sometimes when getting into the nitty-gritty details of Dick's life in trading, but kids who are dedicated enough will skim over these if they're bored, or real them through thoroughly if they're not. I appreciated the Endnote that Armstrong chose to place in the back of the book. In that section Armstrong places Dick Whittington within a historical context and explains exactly which elements were added to the fable later and which ones were not. He even cites his resources for stories of Whittington, info on the lives of rats, fables, medieval plants, barnyard animals, medieval children, Marco Polo, sugar, and dyslexia. I'm a big fan of citing sources (done to brilliance in 2004's, "Al Capone Does My Shirts" by Gennifer Choldenko) and Armstrong made me very happy with this choice.

So it's a sweet little tale. And, I might add, appropriate for younger children who have to read a Newbery Award or Honor winner published in the last few years. But it's not extraordinary and doesn't break any new ground in particular. It's just a pleasant tale with some nice elements and a cheerful story. Sweet but not the kind of thing that will stick with children for very long.

This Newbery honor book is the story of families of origin and families of creation. It is also a tale depicting the power of love and of story. Framed within the present in which Ben and Abby, brother and sister, spend time in their grandfather's barn listening to a tale told by the barn cat, Whittington, who is a descendant of the fabled Dick Whittington's cat. The novel "Whittington" moves between a re-telling of the medieval Whittington tale to two present day tales in which Ben is struggling to read and the animals are struggling for primacy in the barn.

"Whittington" offers adventures and excitement in the tales of Dick's travel as a peddler, as well as in the battle of the animals in the barn. The story also offers emotional insights and pathos in the tale of Ben working through his problem with dyslexia and the recovery of Lady, the duck who is head of the animals in the barn, after an attack.

This would be an enjoyable family or classroom read-aloud for 4th and 5th graders, as well as a rewarding book for kids who like animal tales and/or fables.

Whittington, a Newbery Honor book, is the story of a cat who comes to live in a barnyard of down-and-out animals given a home by Bernie who with his wife cares for Abby and Ben, his orphaned grandchildren. The cat Whittington is the namesake of Dick Whittington, a London merchant and advocate for the poor during the mid 1300's. As Whittington tells the barnyard menagerie of his ancestor who was the companion of Dick Whittington we also find that Ben is struggling from the embarrassment and problems of dyslexia. Ben's struggles are interwoven with Whittington's storytelling. While this is a good story which imparts history and science through the words of the animals, the transition from real time to storytelling does not always flow well. The accounts of the merchant trade slows the story down at times and seems rather textbook-like. Until the very end, the characters lack the three-dimensionality that allows the reader to empathize with them. An enjoyable read nontheless.

This is a marvelous retelling of a classic children's story, as told to a group of farm animals and children by--of course--a cat. Dick Whittington was a real person and while the story somewhat enhances the truth, it is still worth reading.

My 4th-grader son and I are in a parent/child book group, and this was one of the titles. My son thought it was just okay. I thought it was a pretty typical example of modern fiction for this age group -- dismal! This is why I keep handing my kids classics to read.

Another reviewer said that comparisons to E.B. White were out of line, and I totally agree. E.B. White actually created each animal character to be a unique individual that represented human traits. The dialog, posturing and movement of each of E.B. White's animal characters was well-crafted, as opposed to Armstrong's lazy way of letting each character speak for him, with incredibly similar dialog and only superficial singular traits (the duck can't fly, the cat's ear flops over...). One animal, for example, gets annoyed with another animal for using a big word like "nocturnal." Several chapters earlier the annoyed animal had used the word "parley" (as in "discussion with the enemy"). My son already knew the word "nocturnal" but he had to look up "parley." This is sloppy verbal characterization that is surprising to find in a Newberry Honor book.

I understand the "magic" of this book is supposed to be the way Armstrong wove together a story from the past with a situation in the present, but he didn't craft enough parallels between the two plot lines to make it anything more than a ponderous device.

Furthermore, there were maddening loose ends -- sudden appearances of new characters that do nothing to drive the plot...intriguing events that similarly have nothing to do with anything, such as the elaborate whistling for an owl that ends up going nowhere at all...conflicts resolved so rapidly, you wonder why they were written into the plot to begin with because they do nothing to build the tension of rising action.

As a parent, there were two things in particular that really annoyed me. First, there is a mild lusting scene as a young man covets a girl he barely knows with quite descriptive language. This book is supposed to be for FOURTH TO SIXTH GRADERS! It went way over my son's head, thank goodness, but it was completely inappropriate for a novel written for kids ages 9 to 12.

Second, there wasn't a single healthy family represented in the entire book, leading to a very cynical view of the family. Not only are humans regularly abandoned and/or abandoning others, even the animals have broken family relationships. There is a heartbreaking scene when one of the animal characters loses a spouse and children, and it's treated in a completely insensitive way for youngsters who still believe that their family is the most trustworthy source of love, protection, encouragement and support that there is.

Well, that's enough Alan Armstrong for me and my kid, unless we have to read more of this slovenly fiction for our book group. Although it did inspire me to consider writing my own youth fiction. Obviously, it's not that hard to get a Newberry Honor -- you don't really have to work at the characterization or plot. You just need some sort of nifty device like working in a history lesson and a bit of biology and chemistry.

If you like to read realistic fiction books WHITTINGTON is the book for you. This book talks about a cat named Whittington who doesn't have a home because his owner had to get rid of him to be able to go to a special program. Then one day he sees a duck walking in his direction. He asks her if she had a home. She told him that she lived in a barn with other animals. He asks her if he could go and live with them. When the duck, Lady, brings him to meet the barn animals they agree to let him stay. In the barn, Whittington helps them with a lot of adventures and helps a boy with reading and writing.
Will the boy, Ben, ever learn how to read & write? What happens when a hawk tries to eat Lady? What will Whittington do?



In this book, Armstrong describes the characters really well that you can visualize it.
Whittington is described by his specialty of catching rats and helping the barn animals. Lady is described to be the boss of the barn and cares about other animals and people. The boy Ben is described as a quiet kid but that has trouble with his reading. He gets very frustrated when he can't read something and loses his patience. Where the story took place was in a barn. The type of genre this is realistic fiction. This book will keep you hooked until the end readers!

This is an enjoyable and fascinating book. My 2 children (7 & 4) are reading this with me in school. Some of the language is a little mature for them, yet their interest and attention are still held. They like the dynamics between the animals and just like Charlotte's Web, they seem amused that the animals can talk.

I enjoyed this story. I grew up with the pleasure of a family life of barnyard friends and I later learned to appreciate history. This story is the marriage of these two passions. I felt transplanted to a simplier time and found escape and pleasure in the book myself. I am not sure the age group marketed will get it but I did.

I loved this new Newbery Honor book. It is one that will keep the reader's attention, as well as having an excellent plot. Well worth having as part of a personal or classroom library.