Who Chose the Gospels?: Probing the Great Gospel Conspiracy and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
  • List Price: $18.95
  • Save: $2.49 (13%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
+ $3.99 shipping
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by BWB - Textbooks
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Shipped by Better World Books. Great condition for a used book! Minimal wear. 100% Money Back Guarantee. Shipped to over one million happy customers.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Sell yours for a Gift Card
We'll buy it for $4.08
Learn More
Trade in now
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Who Chose the Gospels?: Probing the Great Gospel Conspiracy Paperback – April 7, 2012

ISBN-13: 978-0199640294 ISBN-10: 0199640297 Edition: Reprint

Buy New
Price: $16.46
25 New from $12.44 13 Used from $12.30
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
$12.44 $12.30

Frequently Bought Together

Who Chose the Gospels?: Probing the Great Gospel Conspiracy + Four Portraits, One Jesus: A Survey of Jesus and the Gospels + Reading the Gospels Wisely: A Narrative and Theological Introduction
Price for all three: $64.05

Buy the selected items together

Best Books of the Year
Best Books of 2014
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2014's Best Books of the Year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 320 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press; Reprint edition (April 7, 2012)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0199640297
  • ISBN-13: 978-0199640294
  • Product Dimensions: 7.9 x 0.8 x 5.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (22 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #454,066 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews


"Interesting and appealing...Hill's presentation of early Christian sources is informative, easy to follow for the layman, and offers a much needed counterbalance in scholarship. It cogently argues for the early ascendancy of the four canonical Gospels and lacks the sensationalism that pervades many recent studies of early Christianity."--BYU Studies Quarterly

About the Author

C. E. Hill is Professor of New Testament at the Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando, Florida.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

It is pretty informative and well written book.
I would highly suggest this book for anyone who would like to know more about how we got our Gospels in which we read today in the Bible.
Student for Christ
Excellent, well researched book that presents clear evidence for every assertion he makes.
David E. Mosteller

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

70 of 76 people found the following review helpful By James J. Cassidy on December 8, 2010
Format: Hardcover
In this recent volume, Dr. Hill seeks to finally set the record straight concerning certain urban myths about the recognition of the four canonical Gospels by the church, and those Gospels' putative competitors. In fact, Hill does more than set the record straight. He exposes the lies, hyperbole, and exaggerations of contemporary popular theories of the formulation of the canon of the New Testament. If you have ever been disturbed by anyone from Dan Brown to Bart Ehrman and their outrageous claims about (against?) the Bible, then this book is for you.

In chapter 1, Dr. Hill addresses the Ehrman argument that there was no orthodoxy before the 4th century. It was not until a majority of bishops got together, Ehrman argues, who were able to squeeze out a victory against the opposing side that there was anything "orthodox." Before that point, you only had equally valid competing views - and Gospels. But after the orthodox victory, the winners silenced the minority and destroyed their books. However, Hill cites numerous evidence from the excavation site in Egypt (the home of early Christian heterodoxy, orthodoxy being in the minority) called Oxyrhynchus (the place of a massive garbage heap) where there have been over 500,000 bits and pieces of manuscripts, the majority of which are from three of the four Gospels and date to the second century. Hill finds it interesting - and odd - that "orthodox" manuscripts would be found in a garbage dump if it were actually the orthodox groups that were covering up the "heterodox" documents in some grand conspiracy (p. 23). Kinda puts the kibosh on the Dan Brown conspiracy theories of the sneering, mean, ignorant Bishops who hid truth for the sake of building up their own power and influence!

Chapter 2 is nothing less than brilliant.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
21 of 23 people found the following review helpful By D. Peter Humphrys on February 19, 2011
Format: Hardcover
This book is a very interesting defense of the fourfold Gospel of the early Church. It is not too difficult for the non-specialist to follow, however it it not light reading by any means, especially if one is reading the endnotes where he engages the breadth of scholarship more fully. However, I would quibble with his annoying habit of failing to name some of the scholars whom he is critizing at points - page 267 footnote 23 "I will refrain from naming names at this point, but the scholars know who they are!" is not the only point where he fails to identify the scholar(s) he is talking about. Yet, Hill has certainly challenged a number of assumptions that I have been working with concerning the circulation of various gospels in the early church. Moreover, his presentation strikes me as balanced and fair in that his scholarship does not come accross as overly partisan, for example I was not surprized to see him criticize Bart Ehrman (a former believer now an avowed agnostic/atheist), but I was at first surprized to see him criticize Lee Martin McDonald (whom I take to be a baptist evangelical, certainly on the conservative side of the scholarly spectrum). One of the more memorable, and I think important questions which Hill asks is in connection with the "proto-orthodox ... suppression of confiscated heretical treatises." "But where does one take confiscated heretical treatises when one sets out to destroy them? Probably to the rubbish heaps!" Following on this questionable assumption, he argues that "Egyptian rubbish heaps have so far revealed a strange and embarassing preponderance of proto-orthodox as opposed to proto-heretical materials." (23) Yet, can one turn his argument around?Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
16 of 19 people found the following review helpful By Amazon Customer VINE VOICE on July 14, 2011
Format: Hardcover
By odd coincidence, I picked up "Forged" by Ehrman and "Who Chose the Gospels" on the same day, and ended up reading them back to back.

Wow. What a contrast. Ehrman makes errors in facts, wildly overstates his case, refuses to acknowledge alternative arguments, and constantly makes snide comments about Christians. His book was the single worst book I have ever read in my life from someone who is supposed to be a scholar.

It was such a relief to to turn to Hill's book. Hill is always fair. He always mentions the opposing arguments. And he is blissfully logical in comparison to Ehrman.

Hill also rightly corrects Pagels' false claim about Irenaeus ordering books destroyed. (p 59) and points out how much impact Gnostic and other false gospels had on early Christian writings. That is: none. Unless you count the condemnations.

But most ignored them utterly. Clement, for example expressed "complete lack of interest in these gospels" (p 72) and never mentioned one of them. Even though "some today like to promote as the main popular rivals: (p 72) of the Gospels themselves, where is the evidence? \

Furthermore, the gloomy ravings of the anti-woman, anti-flesh Gnostics are about as interesting and appealing as mud.

It was also such a contrast to have Hill repeat. which many others have done, what a difference in the number of actual gospel fragments we have found in comparison to the number of Gnostic writings dating to the second century and later. The canonical Gospels still outnumber non-canonical ones by about three to one" (p 21),

I also have to comment on his chapter titles because they are humorous and show the style of Hill's writings. One chapter is titled "The Search for an Arch-Conspirator".
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?