Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Sep 26, 2012 3:11:57 PM PDT
Many reputable and accredited scientists believe in a creator. Organized Religion, the reverence for a creator, is not the same as belief.

The universe began with energy, then a subatomic particle. No scientist can deny the "possibility" that it was all designed :the numerous successive sequences that resulted in a organized Universe and ultimately the marvel of the human body which can understand it all, even destroy our planet.
A creator may not be necessary if one BELIEVES in multiverses and abiogenesis (mere hypotheses, for neither of which is there evidence), an incredible series of lucky coincidences, rare beneficial mutations, and much more such as the organization of atoms (if not the design).
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Participants:  1
Total posts:  1
Initial post:  Sep 26, 2012
Latest post:  Sep 26, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions
This discussion is about
God and the Folly of Faith: The Incompatibility of Science and Religion
God and the Folly of Faith: The Incompatibility of Science and Religion by Victor J. Stenger (Paperback - April 24, 2012)
4.1 out of 5 stars   (66)