Who's Counting? and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more



or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Who's Counting? on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

Who's Counting?: How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk [Paperback]

John Fund , Hans von Spakovsky
4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (23 customer reviews)

List Price: $16.99
Price: $11.79 & FREE Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $5.20 (31%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it Wednesday, May 29? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $9.34  
Paperback $11.79  
Image
Save on Popular Books This Summer
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more.

Book Description

August 14, 2012
The 2012 election will be one of the hardest-fought in U.S. history. It is also likely to be one of the closest, a fact that brings concerns about voter fraud and bureaucratic incompetence in the conduct of elections front and center. If we don't take notice, we could see another debacle like the Bush-Gore Florida recount of 2000 in which courts and lawyers intervened in what should have involved only voters.

Who's Counting? will focus attention on many problems of our election system, ranging from voter fraud to a slipshod system of vote counting that noted political scientist Walter Dean Burnham calls “the most careless of the developed world.” In an effort to clean up our election laws, reduce fraud and increase public confidence in the integrity of the voting system, many states ranging from Georgia to Wisconsin have passed laws requiring a photo ID be shown at the polls and curbing the rampant use of absentee ballots, a tool of choice by fraudsters. The response from Obama allies has been to belittle the need for such laws and attack them as akin to the second coming of a racist tide in American life. In the summer of 2011, both Bill Clinton and DNC chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz preposterously claimed that such laws suppressed minority voters and represented a return to the era of Jim Crow.

But voter fraud is a well-documented reality in American elections. Just this year, a sheriff and county clerk in West Virginia pleaded guilty to stuffing ballot boxes with fraudulent absentee ballots that changed the outcome of an election. In 2005, a state senate election in Tennessee was overturned because of voter fraud. The margin of victory? 13 votes. In 2008, the Minnesota senate race that provided the 60th vote needed to pass Obamacare was decided by a little over 300 votes. Almost 200 felons have already been convicted of voting illegally in that election and dozens of other prosecutions are still pending. Public confidence in the integrity of elections is at an all-time low. In the Cooperative Congressional Election Study of 2008, 62% of American voters thought that voter fraud was very common or somewhat common. Fear that elections are being stolen erodes the legitimacy of our government. That's why the vast majority of Americans support laws like Kansas's Secure and Fair Elections Act. A 2010 Rasmussen poll showed that 82% of Americans support photo ID laws.

While Americans frequently demand observers and best practices in the elections of other countries, we are often blind to the need to scrutinize our own elections. We may pay the consequences in 2012 if a close election leads us into pitched partisan battles and court fights that will dwarf the Bush-Gore recount wars.

Frequently Bought Together

Who's Counting?: How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk + Stealing Elections: How Voter Fraud Threatens Our Democracy
Price for both: $23.97

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

About the Author

John Fund is the National Affairs Columnist for National Review magazine and a frequent commentator on television. He has written on electoral irregularities for the Wall Street Journal, The New Republic and other publications.

Hans von Spakovsky is a Senior Legal Fellow at The Heritage Foundation and a former member of the Federal Election Commission. He has served as an election official in Georgia and Virginia and previously enforced federal voting rights laws at the U.S. Justice Department as Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights. He lives in Vienna, VA.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 304 pages
  • Publisher: Encounter Books (August 14, 2012)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1594036187
  • ISBN-13: 978-1594036187
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 1.1 x 8.9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (23 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #237,692 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
52 of 64 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Manual for the 2012 Election August 8, 2012
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
I read this book. It is an excellent manual to understanding the mechanics of American elections. It documents extensive voter fraud across the nation and describes how voter fraud was responsible for delivering the 60th seat in the Senate and a filibuster proof majority for Obama care. The book quotes an actual felon who illegally voted for Al Franken and said she hoped her vote made a difference. Hard to quibble with a confession.

The book also describes why the Electoral College is an important tool to preserve freedom.

The book also names names, the names of people and organizions who are vote fraud deniers. These groups attack anyone who documents voter fraud (and you will probably see this species show up in the reviews). The authors also descibe how the Eric Holder Justice Department is facilitating the corruption of American elections.

Fund and von Spakovsky have written a highly accessabile book. It isn't something that would appear at a little-read academic publishing house. It is a readable catalog of how the machinery of American elections is dominated by groups adverse to election integrity and bureaucrats who enable them.
Was this review helpful to you?
36 of 45 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars I actually read the book - August 9, 2012
By Willie
Format:Paperback
From cover to cover, the facts written have been well documented. One of the things explained in the book is how Al Franken won by 312 votes and about 200 have already been convicted of voter fraud with more to come. Al Franken was the 60th vote that passed ObamaCare, and just for the record, it is a nonpartisan prospective - The book has data from Democrats and Republicans. Question for non believers - If your vote is cancelled out by just one illegal, isn't that a reason to be concerned?

The book also explains that the "Tool of Choice" for voter fraud is the absentee ballot. The Obama Administration will have 10,000 Lawyers in every state in November. In 2000, the Bush v Gore was decided on 527 votes and so on.

This book is a must if you value your vote.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
24 of 30 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Fund and von Spakovsky Hit Home Run August 21, 2012
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
Readers who wish to obtain information about enforcement of voting laws in the United States have two recently published choices: Who's Counting by John Fund and Hans von Spakovsky and Voting Wars by Rick Hasen. Who's Counting gives an accurate depiction of the serious enforcement problems that have arisen because Liberal /Left ideologues in the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ have chosen not to enforce voting laws in a race-neutral manner. In addition, Who's Counting explores and explains the voting processes that will influence and may play a decisive role in this year's presidential election. The authors' descriptions of voting fraud expose the shallowness of voting fraud deniers's claims and make clear how voting fraud both diminishes voter confidence in the voting process and dilutes the votes of legal voters.
Because of personal experiences, I know that Hasen's Voting Wars is not a reliable discussion of issues that relate to the need for race neutral enforcement of our voting laws. The case of U.S. v. Ike Brown was the first time that the DOJ had ever filed a case under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, alleging that black election officials had discriminated against whites. It was filed in 2005 during the second George W. Bush Administration. After a lengthy trial both the federal district court and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that black election officials had participated in intentional and widespread acts of race discrimination against white voters and white candidates. I served as the lead trial attorney for the United States in that case. At the time of the filing of New Black Panther Party (NBPP) case in 2008, I was Chief of the Voting Section in the DOJ's Civil Rights Division and was actively involved in the supervision of the NBPP case.
In his book, Hasen focuses upon both the Ike Brown case and the Obama Administration's dismissal of parties and claims in the NBPP case. Regarding the Ike Brown case, Hasen claims that it was brought by the DOJ because lead defendant Ike Brown has been successful in organizing absentee ballot voting for black voters. Hasen's claim is blatantly false, as demonstrated by the rulings of the two federal courts that heard the Brown case. It is the same defense that Brown, a two-time convicted felon, and his attorneys made in the case but to no avail. Regarding the NBPP case, Hasen simply chooses to set forth the Obama's Administration's explanation for its dismissals in the case, and that version too is not correct.
If Hasen had interviewed for his book me or any of the other attorneys who were actually involved in the investigation and court proceedings in the Ike Brown or NBPP cases, he would have been provided information that would have demonstrated why his explanations of both cases are inaccurate. At least his investigation of these cases would have heard from persons other than apologists for racially selective enforcement of voting laws. Instead, Hasen did not do this type of even-handed research, and because he failed to do so, he has written an inaccurate book, at least on the Ike Brown and NBPP cases. His lack of a complete investigation of these two cases leads me to believe that Hasen is likely masquerading as an objective social scientist while actually carrying water for the Liberal/Left and the Obama Administration.
I recommend that you read the Fund and von Spakovsky's Whose Counting and that you read with skepticism, if you read it at all, Hasen's Voting Wars.

Christopher Coates
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars Met the Author last night, very insightful.
John Fund spoke to our Republican Club at our President's Day Dinner. He knows what's going on and tells you what to watch out for. Read more
Published 3 months ago by Elizebeth H. Overton
4.0 out of 5 stars No Problems, Good Service
We have had no problems with this product. Also, the service was very good, and the product arrived on time.
Published 4 months ago by Donald L. Clapp
4.0 out of 5 stars It will shock you
I haven't finished reading it but have read enough to know our elections are being stolen on a regular basis.
Published 4 months ago by Jackie Archer
5.0 out of 5 stars Well researched and reported
Title:"Who's Counting." Excellent discussion about the current mendacity parading as truthful reporting. Read more
Published 5 months ago by Vic Bliden
5.0 out of 5 stars I really loved this book.
I really loved this book. The authors really do a wonderful job arguing there side. Well done. Thank you very much
Published 5 months ago by Timothy J Heise
3.0 out of 5 stars Good book
I've only had a chance to glance at it a little bit, but will definitely read it when I get the chance.
Published 5 months ago by Babs
4.0 out of 5 stars A Reasoned Case for Election Integrity
In the United States of America you need a photo ID to live. That fact is indisputable. Getting a photo ID is easy, cheap, and quick. That fact is also indisputable. Read more
Published 6 months ago by Douglas P. Dahl
5.0 out of 5 stars Who's Counting?: How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk
Misters Fund and Spakovsky do an admirable jobs of highlighting some of the shortcomings of American Democracy. Read more
Published 6 months ago by Johnny UnBlackworthy
4.0 out of 5 stars How weak voting laws allow the powerful to corrupt elections
Who's Counting is a book that reports many of the ways candidates can sway elections under our nation's varied and most-times flawed election rules. Read more
Published 6 months ago by Mark T Tindall
5.0 out of 5 stars Who's Counting
I thought that I was buying a "used" book, but this copy was immaculate !!! I shall definitely buy again. Great service too !! Highest rating.
Published 7 months ago by cypress72
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews


Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 



So You'd Like to...



Look for Similar Items by Category