Why American History Is Not What They Say: An Introduction to Revisionism [Paperback]

Jeff Riggenbach (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: 2009

Jeff Riggenbach's book is a godsend for anyone who needs a crash course in revisionist history of the United States. What is revisionism? It is the retelling of history from a point of view that differs from the mainstream, which always treats the victor (the state) as glorious and the conquered (individual liberty) as deserving of its fate.

There is a massive literature of revisionist American history. It is so vast, in fact, that people whose field is economics, law, or philosophy can feel intimidated by it all, especially since this material is not taught in class. Must we accept the idea that the architects of the Constitution loved liberty, that Lincoln was a liberator, that the United States had to crush Spain in the late 19th century, that World War I was unavoidable, that the U.S. was always the good guy in the Cold War?

No, not at all, say the revisionists. They tell a version of events that turns every convention on its head. But there is yet another problem here: most of the major revisionist historians are writing from the point of view of the political left, and their interpretation is skewed by that bias. What Riggenbach does is offer a thoroughgoing critique of leftwing revisionism in favor of a distinctly libertarian form of revisionism.

This book is a roundup of the major figures and the most important books; it is also a clear-headed assessment of all the major controversies. What you get from this one book is what would otherwise take a student months or years of searching in the library to locate and learn. There has never been anything like it.

This book is written in an engaging style, with the goal of sharing as much knowledge of this literature with the reader as is possible. In this way, this book opens up whole worlds you never knew existed.

There is no longer any reason to feel lost in the thicket of interpretation and reinterpretation. Like Virgil in the Inferno, Riggenbach is your guide.

Product Details

• Paperback: 212 pages
• Publisher: Ludwig von Mises Institute (2009)
• Language: English
• ASIN: B00275PS2Q
• Product Dimensions: 8.4 x 5.8 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 12.6 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #887,553 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Jeff Riggenbach (born January 12, 1947) is an American libertarian journalist, author, editor, and broadcaster.
Educated at the University of Houston and California State University, Dominguez Hills, Riggenbach began working in
journalism and broadcasting while still a student. Over a period of nearly thirty years (1966-1995), he worked in classical
and all-news radio in Houston, Los Angeles, and San Francisco as a writer, anchor, producer, and book and music critic;
contributed articles and reviews to numerous daily newspapers, including The New York Times, USA Today, the Los
Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, the San Francisco Chronicle, the San Jose Mercury News, and the Washington
Times; held staff writing positions on two of California's largest dailies, the Oakland Tribune and the Orange County
Register; served as executive editor of Libertarian Review and as managing editor of the Pacific Business Review; put in
two years as the daily economics commentator for CNN Radio; and served as a contributing editor of several magazines,
including Reason, Inquiry Magazine, and Liberty Magazine. Throughout the 1980s, he produced the nationally
syndicated daily radio programs "Byline" (well known as the radio home during the '80s of Nicholas Von Hoffman, Nat
Hentoff, Michael Kinsley, Julian Bond, Howard Jarvis, and U.S. Senator William Proxmire) and "Perspective on the
Economy." Since the dawn of the new century, he has written increasingly for publication on the Internet, most notably
on LewRockwell.com, AntiWar.com, and RationalReview.com.
He has long been associated with various libertarian think tanks and foundations, creating, managing, or working on
special projects for the Cato Institute, the Reason Foundation, the Center for Independent Thought, and the Ludwig von
Mises Institute, among others. In 2005 he was named a senior fellow of the Randolph Bourne Institute.
Riggenbach's first book, In Praise of Decadence (1998), argued that the baby boomers turned out to be far more
libertarian in their personal philosophy than had been expected. His second book, Why American History Is Not What
They Say: An Introduction to Revisionism (2009), argued that political events and trends in late 20th Century America
had led to a rebirth of popular interest in revisionist accounts of American history.
Since 1992, Riggenbach has forged a busy second career as a narrator of audio books on political, economic, and
historical subjects for a number of producing organizations and audio publishers, most notably Blackstone Audio of
Ashland, Oregon.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

24 of 25 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Everything I expected and a lot more, May 29, 2009

By 

Andrew S. Rogers (Stamford, Connecticut) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (TOP 1000 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Why American History Is Not What They Say: An Introduction to Revisionism (Paperback)

I knew going in that this book would be educational and thought provoking. It turned out to be so in ways I wasn't expecting.

Subtitled "An Introduction to Revisionism," I expected this title to be almost bibliographical in certain ways, telling the reader "If you want to get the revisionist story on Pearl Harbor," for example, "read this title by Harry Elmer Barnes. For the straight dope on Abraham Lincoln, start with Thomas DiLorenzo, the follow with X and Y." And there is a little bit of that: the core of this book is author Jeff Riggenbach's walk through American history as the revisionists tell it, with emphasis not only on key revisionist historians, but also on the eras of American history that have attracted the most revisionist attention, namely the War Between the States and the two world wars.

But that's only the start.

Or, describing its physical placement in the book, that's only the middle. Riggenbach in fact starts us out, somewhat surprisingly, with a survey of the novels of Gore Vidal, making the case for Vidal as a significant revisionist historian in his own right. At first, I frankly found this a little annoying, since I don't read a lot of fiction and was in a hurry to get to the "real" historians. But the author eventually brought me around to understanding that Vidal is, if nothing else, by far the most widely read of any of the writers mentioned in this book, and therefore probably the most influential purveyor of a non-standard interpretation of American history. Fair enough. Following the survey of American history described above, Riggenbach also gave me a new respect for something I'd always assumed was leftist propaganda, Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States: 1492 to Present. Especially when contrasted, as Riggenbach does, with the neo-con A Patriot's History of the United States: From Columbus's Great Discovery to the War on Terror, Zinn now strikes me as more worth-reading than ever. The last section deals with the issue of high school and college history textbooks, and the battles over what gets presented to students as the government-approved version of what happened and why.

All of that to say, this book covers quite a bit of ground. What I was really not expecting to find in a Mises Institute book, however, was a surprisingly strong denunciation of ... of all people ... Murray Rothbard. This is the section I found most thought-provoking. For Riggenbach argues that liberalism -- "classical liberalism" or libertarianism, today -- is and has always been a phenomenon of the Left. His specific critique of Rothbard is for classifying opponents of the New Deal like Garet Garrett and Albert Jay Nock as the "Old Right," a term with real currency now in certain circles. Taxonomizing liberalism (rightly understood) as a phenomenon of the Right, Riggenbach argues, leads to all sorts of problems and misinterpretations, including confusion about who libertarians' natural allies are. This, in turn, has led to significant betrayals of core principles, like following the lead of conservatives in endorsing certain instances of aggressive interventionism. As one who has always accepted Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn's argument that free minds and free markets are characteristic of the Right (see, for example, the "What is Left?/What is Right?" chart in K-L's Leftism Revisited: From De Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot), reading that they are in fact Leftist principles takes a little getting used to. I would love to hear more discussion and debate on this point. It is not at all an irrelevant issue of "labeling," I think.

At any rate, I definitely recommend this book. It did fulfill my initial expectation of giving me a long list of authors and books to look into ... not least Gore Vidal ... although I'm glad to say most of them weren't completely unknown to me before. But I ended up taking away a lot more, besides. A definite "well done" to Jeff Riggenbach, and another hearty thanks to the Mises Institute.

6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars A discussion not a compendium, September 8, 2009

By 

Earth that Was - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Why American History Is Not What They Say: An Introduction to Revisionism (Paperback)

Jeff Riggenbach has provided a fascinating, but in some ways quirky, survey of the revisionist movement in American history. Riggenbach does not provide either a "Readers' Digest" summary of revisionism or even an introduction to the subject. What he does provide is an outline of some of the main currents of the revisionist tradition of American history which (surprisingly) is ably summarised by the "fictional" works of Gore Vidal. Vidal, no doubt, is a serious student of revisionism. Riggenbach is a serious student of American literature so this approach is both unique and interesting. Riggenbach brings in more conventional debates over historiography, objectivity in history, the role of "historical fiction" and the "textbook wars" along the way. These diverse subjects are suitably weaved together by Riggenbach.

Riggenbach departs from this "broad brush" approach on only a few occasions. He critiques Murray Rothbard (who was both an able economist and historian) for his "Old Right" conception of the World War Two / early Cold War anti-interventionists. Riggenbach points out that there were many leftists and liberals in the usual listings of "Old Right" figures. In many ways this is "flogging a dead horse." Rothbard and fellow historian of the Old Right, one time New Leftist, Ronald Radosh, generally recognised the diverse roots of the movement, which nonetheless still had it's main political representation from the (right wing) Taft wing of the Republican Party. More useful and perceptive is Riggenbach's discussion of the Republican Party as the heir of the Whigs and Federalists, America's longest running "big government" political tradition. In contrast, it was the 19th century Democrats, or at least some wings of the party, who were perhaps the main transmission belt of classical liberalism during their day. None of this really seems to have much direct relevance to modern American politics. Riggenbach doesn't seem to consider that maybe the 20th century left has leap frogged the big government Federalist/Whig/GOP into becoming the party of "even bigger government", all on their own.

Interesting discussion.

7 of 9 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Outstanding, May 17, 2009

By 

Peter H. Christiansen - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Why American History Is Not What They Say: An Introduction to Revisionism (Paperback)

The most comprehensive yet concise introduction to "historical revisionism" I have ever seen. Extremely well written, it should excite anyone with a serious interest in American history, or America's future.