3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great for lawyers and non-lawyers, September 20, 2010
This review is from: Why the Constitution Matters (Why X Matters Series) (Hardcover)
Mark Tushnet has done a great service to legal professionals AND lay readers in articulating the evolving role of the Constitution and Supreme Court. He also gives you a sense of the political dynamics of both. The writing style is clear and engaging. Highly recommended.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2.0 out of 5 stars
How it Matters, August 24, 2011
This review is from: Why the Constitution Matters (Why X Matters Series) (Hardcover)
This book's dust jacket claims that "Why the Constitution Matters" is "a surprising and unconventional work", although the author, Professor Mark Tushnet, claims that his argument is a common one in academia. I was indeed surprised at this work, but I was also slightly frustrated, as the book often had the feeling of a stream of consciousness. The argument often took long and winding detours, as if Tushnet wasn't quite sure where he was going half of the time, and some of the passages were nigh incomprehensible, like this one (which took me about twenty re-reads to comprehend): "Franklin Roosevelt, a reconstructive president, had to deal with a Supreme Court shaped by the regime that he proposed to transform dramatically with support from a substantial minority of the American people."
Anyway, Tushnet's argument is that the American Constitution matters not because it protects rights and liberties, but because it structures our nation's politics. The Constitution gives us our party system, even though nothing is written in the text about political parties. The Constitution also shapes the way political actors are chosen (duh) and behave. Political actors such as the president appoint Supreme Court justices, and these justices are hence part of the political system and not immune to politics (don't let anyone tell you differently). In this way politics, not the Constitution, matter, which is slightly disturbing given the important questions and issues that our Constitution is purported to settle. In the end, Tushnet says that our political system isn't too democratic in places that it should be (I agree), and calls for amendment-bypassing reforms.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Why Mark Tushnet Believes the Constitution Does Not Matter Much, September 27, 2010
This review is from: Why the Constitution Matters (Why X Matters Series) (Hardcover)
The author seems to believe or wants the reader to believe that that constution does not matter much with the following exceptions
- Political parties exist and there are elections set up by the constution that the political parties participate in.
- The Supreme Court is biased arbirtrator of the constitution but what they decide does not really effect us much.
He makes a statment saying that the constitution does not matter much. Well haveing been to 17 countries with differnet forms of government than the US, I believe that our constituion does matter quite a bit. In Saudi Arabia there is no freedom of speach or religion. You are not going to set up a church or an athiest newspaper there. If you are a woman you will not drive vote or most often work. Try to assemble three poeple for an anti governent rally in Saudi, Qatar, Baharain or China see what happens.
The author does not believe the constitution protects our rights or is an arbritor of our rights. He is not vary interested in seperation of powers, historical gains in property rights and personal expression and equality.
In fact the constitutional scholar who wrote this book seems to want a constitutional convention to make the constitution matter. He wants to have more sway in elections and spends most of the book talking about elections.
I think this book should be read so that
A: People do not have to take my word but make their own judgement.
B: To see if they agree with the stance of M. Tushnet.
C: It is important that if you want to understand the consitution and how it matters that you see how it is minimalized by constitutional scholars who wish to bypass it and marginalize it. (again this is opinion and you should form your own not take my word for it.)
D: It gave me a lot of food for thought and I have had good converstations about this book with others who agree and mostly disagree with it.
Note two other volumes in this series Why Translation Matters and Why Poetry Matters are top notch and well worth the read. I am a supporter of this series because it evokes thought that do not agree with my own, which can be express by others and are again protected by our wonderful constitution.
Ernest Boehm
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No