Qty:1
  • List Price: $14.95
  • Save: $2.33 (16%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 2 left in stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
+ $3.99 shipping
Used: Good | Details
Sold by -Daily Deals-
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: This Book is in Good Condition. Used Copy With Light Amount of Wear. 100% Guaranteed.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Why is a Fly Not a Horse? Paperback – July 11, 2005

ISBN-13: 978-0963865472 ISBN-10: 0963865471

Buy New
Price: $12.62
20 New from $8.87 17 Used from $4.56
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$12.62
$8.87 $4.56
Best%20Books%20of%202014
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 176 pages
  • Publisher: Discovery Institute (July 11, 2005)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0963865471
  • ISBN-13: 978-0963865472
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.4 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 8.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (18 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,033,096 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

I am only halfway through, but the spell has already been cast. -- Jonathan Witt, Senior Fellow, Discovery Institute

The attentive reader of this book will be fascinated from beginning to end. -- Dr. Leendert van der Hammen, Founder of the Osaka Group for the Study of Dynamic Structures

With charming prose Sermonti describes biology which contradicts Darwinian expectations: leaf insects... before leaves, insects before plants. -- Dr. Michael Behe, Author, Darwin's Black Box

From the Publisher

This book is part of a series published by the Center for Science & Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle. Previous books in the series include Are We Spiritual Machines?: Ray Kurzweil vs. The Critics of Strong A.I. by Jay W. Richards et al and Getting the Facts Straight: A Viewer's Guide to PBS's Evolution by the Discovery Institute.

Customer Reviews

3.5 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

19 of 25 people found the following review helpful By Saint and Sinner on December 23, 2006
Format: Paperback
This is a good popular work that focuses on the more interesting/less talked about side of the debate. Dr. Sermonti, a famous and well-respected geneticist, speaks with much eloquence about the anomalies in nature that throw a monkey-wrench into Darwin's theory. However, he's not a creationist; rather, it seems that he takes more of a Platonist's view of biological organisms.

Such topics include:

A. The fact that organisms with varying complexity do not have proportional genome sizes. If neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory (NDET from now on) were true, shouldn't mammals have more DNA than amphibians, mollusks, or flowering plants? You would think so if NDET were true and an increase in DNA meant an increase in complexity, but you'd be wrong. They vary *widely*.

B. The sudden appearance and stasis of species in the fossil record. Though this is frequently discussed in other books in the origins debate, it is always good to throw it in.

C. How some animals seem not to be fitted for their environment, but rather, they seem to be works of art. As Sermonti put it: "In fish the colors can be bright and resplendent, even among species that never see the light of upper regions, but their patterning bears no relationship to internal structure; the colors just seem to be put there like paints on an artist's palette" (p.58). There are other things mentioned such as the beautiful mathematical shape of the mollusk's shell and the innate knowledge of some birds to know their bird-song without being taught it.

D. The fact that the same genes (such as hox genes) can create different structures in different animals. For instance, a cat's "eye" genes that are transferred to a blind fly's egg will create the multi-faceted eyes in a fly.

E.
Read more ›
6 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Ricardo F. Oliveira on September 16, 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I found reading the book very enjoyable. One of the points that I liked most was how Giuseppe Sermonti shows that there is no determinism of DNA in relation to some differences in body structure and function. Evidently fundamentalists will label the book creationist garbage. But that does not matter. The dogs bark but the caravan passes.
4 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
26 of 37 people found the following review helpful By Bruce Fast on October 5, 2005
Format: Paperback
I find the structure of this book to be surprising. Most of what Mr. Sermonti has to say is fairly irrelevant to the question of the veracity of NeoDarwinian evolution. He makes a strong case that there are other specific structures in living organisms beside DNA that must be carefully reproduced for life to reproduce. How this is consequential is beyond me. Reproduction is reproduction. Whether it is DNA or prions, if there is accurate reproduction, with rare but existing reproduction error (mutation), then the raw material for NeoDarwinian evolution exists.

However, Mr. Sermonti presents data that is fundamentally contrary to NeoDarwinian evolution. If his data is correct, the only logical conclusion can be that mutation + natural selection, with all of it's subtleties, cannot adequately explain this data. If it cannot adequately explain this data, then it is not the complete answer to the question of how all the varieties of life came to be.

Some have questioned whether NeoDarwinian evolution is falsifiable. Certainly there have been many expectations from simple theory which have found to be too simplistic.

* Scientists expected gradualism to render in the rock record, and concluded that punctuated equilibrium was a better description of the rock record. Rather than finding the theory to be false, evolution adapted to absorb this new data, to the point where punctuated equilibrium is now considered to be a characteristic of NeoDarwinian evolution.

* Studies of animals with similar characteristics were found to have fundamentally different heredities. Seals and Manatees, for instance, are both primarily aquatic animals that have a lot of similarities, but do not have a common ancestry.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
19 of 27 people found the following review helpful By Discovery Reviewer on June 21, 2006
Format: Paperback
Discovery fellow and editor of the prestigious Italian biology journal "Revista de Biologia," Giuseppe Sermonti explains why evolution resembles a "paradigm" more than it does an explanation. Scientists assume that the theory and its implications (such as universal common descent) are true, but no one can ever explain the details of precisely why it is. According to Sermonti, naturalistic theories of biological origins are science-stoppers.

Sermonti explains that biology has advanced greatly when naturalistic theories of biological origins have been disproved. For example, in 1688 Francesco Redi performed an experiment which refuted the notion that flies come from rotting meat--Redi discovered that flies actually come from worms that hatch from eggs laid in rotting biological matter which subsequently develop into flies. The recognition that flies come from eggs rather than meat fostered our early understanding of biological development, but one theory of spontaneous generation had to die before the advance was made.

Sermonti recounts that the field became stalled when the early evolutionist Comte de Buffon imagined that everything from fleas to the hippopotamus emerged from the primordial slime. Providing an Italian perspective on the history of biology, Sermonti explains that an Italian naturalist named Spallanzani refused to just accept spontaneous generation as the easy answer, and through a series of carefully observed experiments, came to the conclusion that "omne vivium ex ovo" (all life comes from eggs). Spontaneous generation was finally disproved by Pasteur's experiments nearly a century later. This was a fact lamented by Darwin, who claimed that Pasteur "denied spontaneous generation." Despite Pasteur's "denial," biology progressed.
Read more ›
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews