T. David Gordon has identified a problem that affects us all and needs to be fixed. Today's preachers are not speaking the language the congregation understands and needs to hear. Fortunately, Gordon not only diagnoses the causes of this failure but also shows us remedies for improvement.
Why Johnny Can't Preach
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
| |||||||||||||||
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
Review
"No, it's not just you. There's a lot of disappointing preaching today, and it's not entirely due to departures from sound principles. It's also affected by the media culture in which we live. While there are helpful studies of popular culture and important books on proper biblical interpretation and theology, this book does both. I couldn't help but wince as I recognized myself in Gordon's descriptions, but he writes so clearly and convincingly that I couldn't help but be grateful." --Michael Horton, Westminster Seminary California
"An insightful diagnosis of a serious problem in the life of the church. For this we should be grateful, as we should for the way out of the crisis to which this book ably points." --David F. Wells, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary
"Adds more to the homiletical conversation than ten books twice its length. Dr. Gordon is saying things that no one else has said, perhaps because no one dares to. He brings two very important perspectives to bear on the serious business of preaching: finely tuned literary sensibilities and media ecology. Electronic media alter perception and dramatically transform the sensibilities of preachers and the rest of the culture. Gordon's analysis offers us hope that Johnny can learn to preach well." --Gregory Edward Reynolds, pastor, author of The Word Is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Preaching in the Electronic Age
"An insightful diagnosis of a serious problem in the life of the church. For this we should be grateful, as we should for the way out of the crisis to which this book ably points." --David F. Wells, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary
"Adds more to the homiletical conversation than ten books twice its length. Dr. Gordon is saying things that no one else has said, perhaps because no one dares to. He brings two very important perspectives to bear on the serious business of preaching: finely tuned literary sensibilities and media ecology. Electronic media alter perception and dramatically transform the sensibilities of preachers and the rest of the culture. Gordon's analysis offers us hope that Johnny can learn to preach well." --Gregory Edward Reynolds, pastor, author of The Word Is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Preaching in the Electronic Age
About the Author
T. David Gordon has been Professor of Religion and Greek at Grove City College since 1999. Previously, he was an Associate Professor of New Testament at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary for 14 years and Pastor at Christ Presbyterian Church (Nashua, NH) for 9 years.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
117 of 120 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
Seventeenth century Puritans produced some of the greatest preachers in Christian history. As far as I know, those preachers had nothing comparable to a modern seminary education. But what they did have was university training that required the careful reading of texts in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew. The Puritan minister was therefore the product of a language-based educational system. Far more than most modern pastors, including myself, he was at home with biblical texts. In addition to his university training, he likely served as a tutor to children of the affluent, and because of his pedagogical responsibilities, became a skilled expositor of ancient texts. All of this proved to be invaluable preparation for extraordinarily fruitful pulpit ministries.
Which brings me to T. David Gordon's Why Johnny Can't Preach: The Media Have Shaped the Messengers, about the modern preacher and his ability both to read biblical texts and communicate compellingly their God-breathed truth. The minister's work is demanding: he must not merely assert the point of his sermon; he must fulfill "his duty of demonstrating that what he is saying is God's will." (18) Sadly, he often seems unaware of his solemn duty, and, even if he is, he finds himself woefully prepared to discharge it adequately.
Why Johnny Can't Preach is a pre-homiletics book. It has little to say about the how-tos of crafting a sermon but much to say about the literary sensibilities and habits of learning a preacher must possess - prior to undertaking the work of sermon construction. These cannot ordinarily be learned at seminary; the ministerial candidate must master them earlier as he studies in academic environments that prize the careful reading, interpretation and exposition of texts.
Gordon's assessment of the contemporary American pulpit is severe. Great preaching is rare, but that is not his fundamental concern: "What I care about is the average Christian family in the average pew in the average church on the average Sunday. And the problem there is not that we don't have `great' preachers; in many circumstance we don't even have mediocre preachers." (14)
The author, an ordained Presbyterian minister, teaches at Grove City College, and among his responsibilities, are courses in media ecology. As a media ecologist he explores our culture's movement from a language-based media to an image-based and electronic media, and how that movement affects the preacher and his preaching.
Two deficiencies mar contemporary preaching: Johnny, the preacher, can't read (texts) and he can't write.
That Johnny can't read doesn't mean that he is illiterate. But reading the sports page, or the latest John Grisham novel, or even a history book is not the same as reading a text - and, especially an ancient text - carefully. Too often readers read either for amusement or scan texts to acquire information. Speed-readers have learned to ignore articles, prepositions, adjectives and adverbs in order to quickly identify the main points. (43) In the process, appreciation for how the text is constructed is lost. (46)
This leads to a sad state of affairs, indeed. "Reading texts demands a very close and intentional reading. One cannot omit a single line of a given Shakespearean sonnet; each of the fourteen lines plays a crucial role. Those who are accustomed to reading such texts read each line for what it contributes to the whole and how it does so. But those not accustomed to reading texts closely just look for what they judge to be the important words, and the concepts to which they ostensibly point, and then give a lecture on that concept - ordinarily without making any effort to explain the passage as a whole, to demonstrate how each clause contributes to some basic overall unity." (48) The same careful attention to the text is demanded of any preacher who would faithfully discharge the duties of his office.
Sadly, the disciplined and careful reading of texts is no longer prized by much of our culture, and is beyond the immediate reach of many pastors. The text is not treated like a door that ushers us into the author's world, enabling us to examine it from his vantage point. Rather, the text becomes a tool to confirm our own biases about reality. (49)
As I read, I thought about books that claim the life of Jesus as the model for the successful CEO, salesperson or guru of human potential. That kind of author approaches the New Testament with predetermined and cherished ideas, and to no one's surprise - the very ideas he expected to discover in the text are waiting there for him, apparently undiscovered by earlier readers, now ready to be exploited and made into a cutting-edge book. Far from these best-selling authors' minds is the need to make the trek from our world back to the first century; to enter the mind of God as revealed through the words of the inspired gospel writers. They penned their accounts amidst the sorrows of God's suffering people, their words capturing the aspirations of the faithful, who waited patiently for the advent of the coming Messiah. Little or no time is devoted to how the words of the gospel writers fit into the grand story of God's redemptive work in preceding revelation, as proclaimed in the law and by the prophets. Our self-help author has no time or proclivity for that kind of study. "To employ C.S. Lewis's way of stating the matter, they `use' texts but do not `receive' them."(50)
Conspiring against the careful reading of texts is the omnipresence of electronic media - inconsequential, distracting, confronting us mostly with the trivial, and robbing us of the "sensibility of significance." (51) Gordon observes: "a culture that is accustomed to commercial interruptions every six or seven minutes loses its ability to discuss significant matters because it has lost the patience necessary to consider them." (54) Such a culture produces ministers "who are not at home with what is significant; ministers whose attention span is less than that of a four-year-old in the 1940s, who race around like the rest of us, consequently distracted by sounds and images of inconsequential trivialities, and out of touch with what is weighty." (58-59)
Life drives a hard bargain: the emergence and use of a new technology demands that we spend less of our time doing what we once did. We have fewer face-to-face encounters with our conversation partners - those occasions which require not just speaking, but also listening and looking, studying visible reactions to our words. Sadly, "ministers today seem especially blind to the visible response of the congregation because, as a culture, we get used to telephone conversations in which there is no visible response."(64)
Diminished, too, is the time spent composing letters. (61-63) Disciplined letter writing demands unity, order and movement," (66) all of which are invaluable to good sermon construction.
Where does this leave us? "A once-common sensibility (close reading of texts) is uncommon, and a once-common activity (composition) is now comparatively rare." (67)
How can Preacher Johnny be taught to preach? Prior to entering seminary, he should study where he learns to read the word of God, and where he is taught the skill of "composed speech." (96) A degree in English literature might be a wise choice for undergraduate students pursuing ministry. (101)
If Johnny is already in ministry, Gordon proposes:
1. An annual review which thoroughly evaluates the preacher's sermons according to unity, intelligibility, and so forth. (98)
2. The continual cultivation of the sensibility of reading texts closely. In addition to studying the scriptures in the original languages, the reading of poetry is most helpful in cultivating literary sensibility. (99-102)
3. The continual cultivation of the sensibility of composed communication through note and letter writing and through writing for publication. Joining a club devoted to honing public speaking skills and soliciting feedback from seasoned preachers are good uses of a minister's time. (103-105)
Although it is not a preaching "how-to" manual, Why Johnny Can't Preach does contain a very helpful review of Robert Lewis Dabney's seven requisites of preaching (23-28) and an extended reflection on the content of preaching (69-93). Gordon argues persuasively that "the content of Christian preaching should be the person, character, and work of Christ." (70) "Christian proclamation properly includes a declaration of those character traits that equip Christ to effectually fulfill his redemptive office. His love, mercy, compassion, and other traits equip him in specific ways to accomplish his works; therefore, the proclamation of such traits nourishes the faith of those who come to God through him."(71) Seriously deficient alternatives to Christological preaching include: moralism, "how-to" preaching, introspection (namely, preaching that constantly suggests to hearers that they might not be believers after all), and "Social Gospel/So-Called Culture War" preaching. None of these alternatives are helpful in cultivating biblical morality. "No; preach Christ, and you will have morality. Fill the sails of your hearers' souls with the wind of confidence in the Redeemer, and they will trust him as their Sanctifier, and long to see his fruit in their lives. Fill their minds and imaginations with a vision of the loveliness and perfection of Christ in his person, and the flock will long to be like him. (78)
I cannot recommend this book too highly to preachers. As I read, deficiencies in my own preaching and preparation came to mind, but along with them, suggestions for improvement. Read more ›
Which brings me to T. David Gordon's Why Johnny Can't Preach: The Media Have Shaped the Messengers, about the modern preacher and his ability both to read biblical texts and communicate compellingly their God-breathed truth. The minister's work is demanding: he must not merely assert the point of his sermon; he must fulfill "his duty of demonstrating that what he is saying is God's will." (18) Sadly, he often seems unaware of his solemn duty, and, even if he is, he finds himself woefully prepared to discharge it adequately.
Why Johnny Can't Preach is a pre-homiletics book. It has little to say about the how-tos of crafting a sermon but much to say about the literary sensibilities and habits of learning a preacher must possess - prior to undertaking the work of sermon construction. These cannot ordinarily be learned at seminary; the ministerial candidate must master them earlier as he studies in academic environments that prize the careful reading, interpretation and exposition of texts.
Gordon's assessment of the contemporary American pulpit is severe. Great preaching is rare, but that is not his fundamental concern: "What I care about is the average Christian family in the average pew in the average church on the average Sunday. And the problem there is not that we don't have `great' preachers; in many circumstance we don't even have mediocre preachers." (14)
The author, an ordained Presbyterian minister, teaches at Grove City College, and among his responsibilities, are courses in media ecology. As a media ecologist he explores our culture's movement from a language-based media to an image-based and electronic media, and how that movement affects the preacher and his preaching.
Two deficiencies mar contemporary preaching: Johnny, the preacher, can't read (texts) and he can't write.
That Johnny can't read doesn't mean that he is illiterate. But reading the sports page, or the latest John Grisham novel, or even a history book is not the same as reading a text - and, especially an ancient text - carefully. Too often readers read either for amusement or scan texts to acquire information. Speed-readers have learned to ignore articles, prepositions, adjectives and adverbs in order to quickly identify the main points. (43) In the process, appreciation for how the text is constructed is lost. (46)
This leads to a sad state of affairs, indeed. "Reading texts demands a very close and intentional reading. One cannot omit a single line of a given Shakespearean sonnet; each of the fourteen lines plays a crucial role. Those who are accustomed to reading such texts read each line for what it contributes to the whole and how it does so. But those not accustomed to reading texts closely just look for what they judge to be the important words, and the concepts to which they ostensibly point, and then give a lecture on that concept - ordinarily without making any effort to explain the passage as a whole, to demonstrate how each clause contributes to some basic overall unity." (48) The same careful attention to the text is demanded of any preacher who would faithfully discharge the duties of his office.
Sadly, the disciplined and careful reading of texts is no longer prized by much of our culture, and is beyond the immediate reach of many pastors. The text is not treated like a door that ushers us into the author's world, enabling us to examine it from his vantage point. Rather, the text becomes a tool to confirm our own biases about reality. (49)
As I read, I thought about books that claim the life of Jesus as the model for the successful CEO, salesperson or guru of human potential. That kind of author approaches the New Testament with predetermined and cherished ideas, and to no one's surprise - the very ideas he expected to discover in the text are waiting there for him, apparently undiscovered by earlier readers, now ready to be exploited and made into a cutting-edge book. Far from these best-selling authors' minds is the need to make the trek from our world back to the first century; to enter the mind of God as revealed through the words of the inspired gospel writers. They penned their accounts amidst the sorrows of God's suffering people, their words capturing the aspirations of the faithful, who waited patiently for the advent of the coming Messiah. Little or no time is devoted to how the words of the gospel writers fit into the grand story of God's redemptive work in preceding revelation, as proclaimed in the law and by the prophets. Our self-help author has no time or proclivity for that kind of study. "To employ C.S. Lewis's way of stating the matter, they `use' texts but do not `receive' them."(50)
Conspiring against the careful reading of texts is the omnipresence of electronic media - inconsequential, distracting, confronting us mostly with the trivial, and robbing us of the "sensibility of significance." (51) Gordon observes: "a culture that is accustomed to commercial interruptions every six or seven minutes loses its ability to discuss significant matters because it has lost the patience necessary to consider them." (54) Such a culture produces ministers "who are not at home with what is significant; ministers whose attention span is less than that of a four-year-old in the 1940s, who race around like the rest of us, consequently distracted by sounds and images of inconsequential trivialities, and out of touch with what is weighty." (58-59)
Life drives a hard bargain: the emergence and use of a new technology demands that we spend less of our time doing what we once did. We have fewer face-to-face encounters with our conversation partners - those occasions which require not just speaking, but also listening and looking, studying visible reactions to our words. Sadly, "ministers today seem especially blind to the visible response of the congregation because, as a culture, we get used to telephone conversations in which there is no visible response."(64)
Diminished, too, is the time spent composing letters. (61-63) Disciplined letter writing demands unity, order and movement," (66) all of which are invaluable to good sermon construction.
Where does this leave us? "A once-common sensibility (close reading of texts) is uncommon, and a once-common activity (composition) is now comparatively rare." (67)
How can Preacher Johnny be taught to preach? Prior to entering seminary, he should study where he learns to read the word of God, and where he is taught the skill of "composed speech." (96) A degree in English literature might be a wise choice for undergraduate students pursuing ministry. (101)
If Johnny is already in ministry, Gordon proposes:
1. An annual review which thoroughly evaluates the preacher's sermons according to unity, intelligibility, and so forth. (98)
2. The continual cultivation of the sensibility of reading texts closely. In addition to studying the scriptures in the original languages, the reading of poetry is most helpful in cultivating literary sensibility. (99-102)
3. The continual cultivation of the sensibility of composed communication through note and letter writing and through writing for publication. Joining a club devoted to honing public speaking skills and soliciting feedback from seasoned preachers are good uses of a minister's time. (103-105)
Although it is not a preaching "how-to" manual, Why Johnny Can't Preach does contain a very helpful review of Robert Lewis Dabney's seven requisites of preaching (23-28) and an extended reflection on the content of preaching (69-93). Gordon argues persuasively that "the content of Christian preaching should be the person, character, and work of Christ." (70) "Christian proclamation properly includes a declaration of those character traits that equip Christ to effectually fulfill his redemptive office. His love, mercy, compassion, and other traits equip him in specific ways to accomplish his works; therefore, the proclamation of such traits nourishes the faith of those who come to God through him."(71) Seriously deficient alternatives to Christological preaching include: moralism, "how-to" preaching, introspection (namely, preaching that constantly suggests to hearers that they might not be believers after all), and "Social Gospel/So-Called Culture War" preaching. None of these alternatives are helpful in cultivating biblical morality. "No; preach Christ, and you will have morality. Fill the sails of your hearers' souls with the wind of confidence in the Redeemer, and they will trust him as their Sanctifier, and long to see his fruit in their lives. Fill their minds and imaginations with a vision of the loveliness and perfection of Christ in his person, and the flock will long to be like him. (78)
I cannot recommend this book too highly to preachers. As I read, deficiencies in my own preaching and preparation came to mind, but along with them, suggestions for improvement. Read more ›
43 of 44 people found the following review helpful
By A. Morgan
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
This book is only 105 pages - and I read it last night - but boy does it pack a punch!
The title is a take on the famous books by Rudolf Flesch is the 60's Why Johnny Can't Read: And What To Do About It & Why Johnny Can't Write: How To Improve Writing Skills.
This book does not mince its words - and there is a reason for this. David GOrdon was diagnosed with cancer and his initial prognosis of survival was 25% chance. As a professor and former church pastor he felt he could not die until he had written about the poor preaching which is prevalent in our church today. He wrote this during the 11 months of treatment he received for the cancer - hence it is blunt and deliberately so.
For Gordon, less than 30% of ordained church ministers can preach at best, a mediocre sermon. The other 70% simply cannot preach. He recounts a story of a humble, godly elder who, having been asked by Gordon if they realized the new pastor they had just hired could not preach, replied "of course we know he could not preach." He went on to say that in the 30 years of being an elder he had never met a pastor who could preach - and that his rotary club has better public speakers.
This challenged Gordon - who in his own experience has generally found the same experience.
Now, this is not about the 'stars' of preaching. This is not trying to say we need to be George Whitefields, or Jonathan Edwards, or Charles Spurgeon. Gordon's point is that in the average church, with the average congregation, the average pastor is unable to deliver even a mediocre, competent sermon.
Gordon argues that there have been presentations, films, plays or concerts where we have watched without once looking at our watches or thinking "when will this end". This is because the presentations were well done. Gordon's argument is that sermons today are listless, rambling, disorganized - which will make even a 10 min sermon endless!!
Gordon rates a sermon by asking the following questions: does the significant point of the sermon arise out of the significant point of the text? If ten people are asked after the sermon what was the sermon about, will at least eight of them give the same answer? Does the sermon significantly engage the mind or is it full of commonplace-cliches, slogans and general truths? Do the earlier parts of the sermon contribute to the latter parts? Could the hearers compare notes and reproduce the outline of the sermon?
The reason for incompetent sermons? - the lack of being able to read texts. The average American reads 9 book annually. There has been a decline of literary reading in 20 years of 10%. Our modern culture is illiterate - not just biblically but generally.
Gordon makes a distinction between reading for INFORMATION and READING a TEXT. The first is to scan for information - the second is to read slowly, drinking in the style and composition of the text - noticing the small things - taking the book line by line. You simply can't read Shakespeare's sonnets for information - you'll miss the point of the sonnet - you have to read the text - slowly and deliberately.
This is also the problem with Bible reading - we have a culture and a habit of reading the Bible for information - not to read the text, slowly, deliberately, drinking in the words. That is why so many can read the bible through year after year and never be changed.
Preachers today read the Bible as they read everything - speed reading. This means they cannot write - and have lost the art of composition. Which means sermons are not based on the text, lack a main point and have applications which do not come from the text.
Gordon implores the church to change. Start learning to read slowly, deliberately - drink in some classic texts - learn to read not just for information.
While I think that Gordon paints the problem with a broader brush stroke than necessary the problem is real. I have met very few competent preachers in the church - even the ones who are hailed in our own diocese as good preachers I have found to be less than mediocre
This is a good book - and should be on the MUST READ for all ministry training courses!
The title is a take on the famous books by Rudolf Flesch is the 60's Why Johnny Can't Read: And What To Do About It & Why Johnny Can't Write: How To Improve Writing Skills.
This book does not mince its words - and there is a reason for this. David GOrdon was diagnosed with cancer and his initial prognosis of survival was 25% chance. As a professor and former church pastor he felt he could not die until he had written about the poor preaching which is prevalent in our church today. He wrote this during the 11 months of treatment he received for the cancer - hence it is blunt and deliberately so.
For Gordon, less than 30% of ordained church ministers can preach at best, a mediocre sermon. The other 70% simply cannot preach. He recounts a story of a humble, godly elder who, having been asked by Gordon if they realized the new pastor they had just hired could not preach, replied "of course we know he could not preach." He went on to say that in the 30 years of being an elder he had never met a pastor who could preach - and that his rotary club has better public speakers.
This challenged Gordon - who in his own experience has generally found the same experience.
Now, this is not about the 'stars' of preaching. This is not trying to say we need to be George Whitefields, or Jonathan Edwards, or Charles Spurgeon. Gordon's point is that in the average church, with the average congregation, the average pastor is unable to deliver even a mediocre, competent sermon.
Gordon argues that there have been presentations, films, plays or concerts where we have watched without once looking at our watches or thinking "when will this end". This is because the presentations were well done. Gordon's argument is that sermons today are listless, rambling, disorganized - which will make even a 10 min sermon endless!!
Gordon rates a sermon by asking the following questions: does the significant point of the sermon arise out of the significant point of the text? If ten people are asked after the sermon what was the sermon about, will at least eight of them give the same answer? Does the sermon significantly engage the mind or is it full of commonplace-cliches, slogans and general truths? Do the earlier parts of the sermon contribute to the latter parts? Could the hearers compare notes and reproduce the outline of the sermon?
The reason for incompetent sermons? - the lack of being able to read texts. The average American reads 9 book annually. There has been a decline of literary reading in 20 years of 10%. Our modern culture is illiterate - not just biblically but generally.
Gordon makes a distinction between reading for INFORMATION and READING a TEXT. The first is to scan for information - the second is to read slowly, drinking in the style and composition of the text - noticing the small things - taking the book line by line. You simply can't read Shakespeare's sonnets for information - you'll miss the point of the sonnet - you have to read the text - slowly and deliberately.
This is also the problem with Bible reading - we have a culture and a habit of reading the Bible for information - not to read the text, slowly, deliberately, drinking in the words. That is why so many can read the bible through year after year and never be changed.
Preachers today read the Bible as they read everything - speed reading. This means they cannot write - and have lost the art of composition. Which means sermons are not based on the text, lack a main point and have applications which do not come from the text.
Gordon implores the church to change. Start learning to read slowly, deliberately - drink in some classic texts - learn to read not just for information.
While I think that Gordon paints the problem with a broader brush stroke than necessary the problem is real. I have met very few competent preachers in the church - even the ones who are hailed in our own diocese as good preachers I have found to be less than mediocre
This is a good book - and should be on the MUST READ for all ministry training courses!
29 of 30 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Nineteen sixty-six saw the publication of a book titled Why Johnny Can't Read. Its author, Rudolf Flesh, explained in it that societal changes were leading to illiteracy; children were increasingly unable to read, at least with the effectiveness of the children of years gone by. By the 1980's, Linden and Whimbey had followed with Why Johnny Can't Write in which they showed the similar societal trends were now keeping Johnny (a generic name used to refer to any child, male or female) from expressing himself in writing. T. David Gordon has self-consciously titled Why Johnny Can't Preach after these books because he uses it to argue that the same societal trends that kept Johnny from being able to read and write have kept a generation of ministers from being able to preach. Johnny just can't preach and Gordon just can't take it anymore.
It is important to the context of this book to realize that, when he wrote it, Gordon believed he had only months to live. He had stage III colorectal cancer and had roughly a 25 percent chance of survival. "Having been concerned about the state of preaching for three decades, I believed that it would be irresponsible to leave the world without expressing my thoughts about the matter, in the hope that better preaching might be the result." So this book has the air of a missive penned from a dying man and directed to dying men (though, happily, Gordon's cancer is now in remission). As he says, "The manuscript is, therefore, at a minimum, heartfelt."
I can think of at least a handful of books that have called contemporary preachers to task for their weak sermons or the unbiblical focus of their ministries. But this is the only one that comes to mind that takes on conservative preachers in conservative churches--the kind of men who preach expository sermons and who have ministries based on verse-by-verse exposition. Says Gordon, "I don't intend to throw stones at others; it is the conservative evangelical churches and conservative Reformed churches with which I am primarily acquainted." This is a look inward, then, and not a look outward.
The reason men cannot preach today, says Gordon, owes not to a lack of caring or a lack of effort; instead it relates primarily to societal changes. The book's subtitle is instructive: The Media Have Shaped the Messengers. In this context media does not refer to mass media, but rather to the many ways in which information or data is communicated to us, the foremost being television.
How bad is the problem? According to Gordon, it is epidemic. "I would guess that of the sermons I've heard in the last twenty-five years, 15 percent had a discernible point; I could say, `The sermon was about X.' Of those 15 percent, however, less than 10 percent demonstrably based the point on the text read. That is, no competent effort was made to persuade the hearer that God's Word required a particular thing; it was simply asserted." Ouch. At the very least, this guy tells it like he sees it. He does not allow the preacher to wiggle out by using shortened attention spans as an excuse. "Ministers have found it entirely too convenient and self-serving to dismiss congregational disinterest on the basis of attenuated attention spans or spiritual indifference. In most cases, the inattentiveness in the congregation is due to poor preaching--preaching that does not reward an energetic, conscientious listening. When attentive listeners are not rewarded for their energetic attentiveness, they eventually become inattentive."
Societal trends, the foremost of which is the dominance of the picture over the word, have led to Johnny's inability to preach. The problem is the condition of the typical ministerial candidate when he arrives at the seminary. The reasons he cannot preach are twofold: he cannot read and he cannot write. Each of these receives a chapter-length treatment. In the first, Gordon demonstrates that Johnny has never been instructed in the reading of texts. He has been taught to read to gather information, to read as a means to an immediate end, but he has never been taught to read with a view to how a text is formed. He reads for content while ignoring construct. "Culturally, then, we are no longer careful, close readers of texts, sacred or secular. We scan for information, but we do not appreciate literary craftsmanship. Exposition is therefore virtually a lost art." In the second, he channels Neil Postman and other writers in demonstrating that Johnny is fast losing the ability to communicate well with the written word. In fact, by relying so heavily on technologies such as the telephone, he has stunted his ability to communicate with others in face-to-face contexts. Where the written word, carefully constructed, is a valuable medium for weighty content, the spoken word, especially over the telephone or other media, gives itself to levity and to thoughtless discussion.
After offering a few words on content, Gordon gives the beginnings of a prescription, a cure for the ills. He suggests that for Johnny to learn to preach he must, at the very least, have an annual review in which the church will tell him how effective they deem his preaching, he must learn to read texts closely and he must learn the sensibility of composed communication. These may not make him into this generation's Charles Spurgeon, but at the very least they will give him the tools he needs to preach the Word of God well. "Our culture, at this moment, will not develop these sensibilities, and so Johnny will cultivate them only if he makes some self-conscious and deliberately countercultural choices about how he wishes his sensibilities to be shaped."
While Gordon is prone to overstate his case at times, and while he may occasionally put preference in the place of law, he has certainly penned a book which stands as an urgent call for men to give themselves anew to the task, the calling, of preaching. It points them to several skills which will, without doubt, help them in their task of faithfully communicating the truths of God's Word to the ears and the hearts of God's people. I do think any preacher will benefit from reading Why Johnny Can't Preach, though I would urge caution in handing it to your pastor--such a gift could easily be misconstrued. And do guard your heart as you read it as I think there is the potential that it could cause you to look unfavorably on your own pastor. Having said that, I think this is a valuable book and one that ought to be widely read.
It is important to the context of this book to realize that, when he wrote it, Gordon believed he had only months to live. He had stage III colorectal cancer and had roughly a 25 percent chance of survival. "Having been concerned about the state of preaching for three decades, I believed that it would be irresponsible to leave the world without expressing my thoughts about the matter, in the hope that better preaching might be the result." So this book has the air of a missive penned from a dying man and directed to dying men (though, happily, Gordon's cancer is now in remission). As he says, "The manuscript is, therefore, at a minimum, heartfelt."
I can think of at least a handful of books that have called contemporary preachers to task for their weak sermons or the unbiblical focus of their ministries. But this is the only one that comes to mind that takes on conservative preachers in conservative churches--the kind of men who preach expository sermons and who have ministries based on verse-by-verse exposition. Says Gordon, "I don't intend to throw stones at others; it is the conservative evangelical churches and conservative Reformed churches with which I am primarily acquainted." This is a look inward, then, and not a look outward.
The reason men cannot preach today, says Gordon, owes not to a lack of caring or a lack of effort; instead it relates primarily to societal changes. The book's subtitle is instructive: The Media Have Shaped the Messengers. In this context media does not refer to mass media, but rather to the many ways in which information or data is communicated to us, the foremost being television.
How bad is the problem? According to Gordon, it is epidemic. "I would guess that of the sermons I've heard in the last twenty-five years, 15 percent had a discernible point; I could say, `The sermon was about X.' Of those 15 percent, however, less than 10 percent demonstrably based the point on the text read. That is, no competent effort was made to persuade the hearer that God's Word required a particular thing; it was simply asserted." Ouch. At the very least, this guy tells it like he sees it. He does not allow the preacher to wiggle out by using shortened attention spans as an excuse. "Ministers have found it entirely too convenient and self-serving to dismiss congregational disinterest on the basis of attenuated attention spans or spiritual indifference. In most cases, the inattentiveness in the congregation is due to poor preaching--preaching that does not reward an energetic, conscientious listening. When attentive listeners are not rewarded for their energetic attentiveness, they eventually become inattentive."
Societal trends, the foremost of which is the dominance of the picture over the word, have led to Johnny's inability to preach. The problem is the condition of the typical ministerial candidate when he arrives at the seminary. The reasons he cannot preach are twofold: he cannot read and he cannot write. Each of these receives a chapter-length treatment. In the first, Gordon demonstrates that Johnny has never been instructed in the reading of texts. He has been taught to read to gather information, to read as a means to an immediate end, but he has never been taught to read with a view to how a text is formed. He reads for content while ignoring construct. "Culturally, then, we are no longer careful, close readers of texts, sacred or secular. We scan for information, but we do not appreciate literary craftsmanship. Exposition is therefore virtually a lost art." In the second, he channels Neil Postman and other writers in demonstrating that Johnny is fast losing the ability to communicate well with the written word. In fact, by relying so heavily on technologies such as the telephone, he has stunted his ability to communicate with others in face-to-face contexts. Where the written word, carefully constructed, is a valuable medium for weighty content, the spoken word, especially over the telephone or other media, gives itself to levity and to thoughtless discussion.
After offering a few words on content, Gordon gives the beginnings of a prescription, a cure for the ills. He suggests that for Johnny to learn to preach he must, at the very least, have an annual review in which the church will tell him how effective they deem his preaching, he must learn to read texts closely and he must learn the sensibility of composed communication. These may not make him into this generation's Charles Spurgeon, but at the very least they will give him the tools he needs to preach the Word of God well. "Our culture, at this moment, will not develop these sensibilities, and so Johnny will cultivate them only if he makes some self-conscious and deliberately countercultural choices about how he wishes his sensibilities to be shaped."
While Gordon is prone to overstate his case at times, and while he may occasionally put preference in the place of law, he has certainly penned a book which stands as an urgent call for men to give themselves anew to the task, the calling, of preaching. It points them to several skills which will, without doubt, help them in their task of faithfully communicating the truths of God's Word to the ears and the hearts of God's people. I do think any preacher will benefit from reading Why Johnny Can't Preach, though I would urge caution in handing it to your pastor--such a gift could easily be misconstrued. And do guard your heart as you read it as I think there is the potential that it could cause you to look unfavorably on your own pastor. Having said that, I think this is a valuable book and one that ought to be widely read.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars
This book will challenge you
This is a good book for challenging the preacher in a more academic way. Gordon states the case for a more literate pastor/preacher.
Published 2 months ago by MW Lawrenz
4.0 out of 5 stars
Insightful
this book points out the real problem(s) with society at this time, namely we know longer take time to compose writings that express genuinely facts, truths, and feelings due to... Read more
Published 4 months ago by Aaron R. Hastings
5.0 out of 5 stars
Ironically, a quick easy read
Well-written, and easy to follow. The book demonstrates that for the non-lazy presenter, some subtle thoughts can be expressed quite well (easy to understand, and thoroughly... Read more
Published 5 months ago by Jonathan A. Kanner
5.0 out of 5 stars
Why Johnny Can't Preach
I found the book to be eye-opening and thought provoking. The media has had a tremendous influence on the world at large,
and certainly in America where it has changed every... Read more
and certainly in America where it has changed every... Read more
Published 8 months ago by W. Morris
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Lost Art
In a Media driven, post-modern society solid expository preaching is a lost Art. Programmed by rapidly flashing images with commercial breaks, many young Pastors lost the ability... Read more
Published 13 months ago by Daniel M. Krodel
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Poor-Preaching Epidemic
I must applaud the heart and soul put into this book. Gordon wrote this when he had cancer that was a threat to his life. Read more
Published 15 months ago by B. Cravens
3.0 out of 5 stars
Not all things that start well end well.
Mr. Gordon's premise is certainly worth considering. The lack of moving, anointed preaching is tangible in America's pulpits. Read more
Published 18 months ago by Geoffrey Lamb
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Serious Prophetic Call for Better Sermons
"Why Johnny Can't Preach has a sense of no-holds barred urgency because when T. David Gordon wrote the book he had cancer and was given a 25% chance of survival. Read more
Published 23 months ago by Fr. Charles Erlandson
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good News For Modern Preachers
A couple of years ago I attended a church that was plagued with sermons of an interim pastor who preached the antithesis of the theme of this book. Read more
Published on March 27, 2011 by P. Gunn
4.0 out of 5 stars
The Beginning of a Diagnosis
T. David Gordon writes in the introduction to this book that he wrote it because he realized he needed to say some things, after a brush with mortality, about his views of the... Read more
Published on March 25, 2011 by D. S. Bornus
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Listmania!
|
|
So You'd Like to...
|
|
